E.W.
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial victim |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Edwards
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Abuser recruiter |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Berger
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
William J. Berger
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney Edwards
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
Epstein's home
|
Visited |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Civil action against Epstein represented by Edwards. | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual assault of three minor girls | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of state and federal court actions against Jeffrey Epstein. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein settled three cases handled by Edwards. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual abuse of three clients (L.M., E.W., Jane Doe). | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of civil suits against Epstein | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein sexually abused three clients of Edwards (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe). | Unknown | View |
| 2013-10-01 | N/A | Bradley Edwards represented L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe in civil action against Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| 2010-07-06 | N/A | Epstein settled civil suits filed by L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe rather than face trial. | Unknown | View |
| 2010-05-06 | N/A | Deposition of E.W. | Unknown | View |
| 2008-09-11 | N/A | Brad Edwards files civil suit (E.W. v. Epstein). | Court | View |
| 2008-07-11 | N/A | Hearing on the CVRA action where victims learned the plea deal was finalized. | Court | View |
| 2008-07-07 | N/A | Edwards filed action in U.S. District Court seeking to enforce rights of E.W. and L.M. | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2008-07-07 | N/A | Edwards filed an action in U.S. District Court alleging violation of the CVRA. | U.S. District Court for the... | View |
| 2008-06-13 | N/A | Attorney Edwards agreed to represent E.W. | Unknown | View |
| 2008-04-01 | N/A | Bradley J. Edwards agrees to serve as legal counsel for L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. | Florida | View |
| 2008-01-10 | N/A | Victims received letters suggesting ongoing investigation and promising future contact. | Unknown | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Victims express concern regarding secret plea bargain negotiations by FBI/US Attorney. | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Bradley J. Edwards agrees to represent L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. | Florida | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013357.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (stamped House Oversight) listing specific instances where Jeffrey Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment rights during a deposition. He refused to answer questions regarding his personal relationship with Bill Clinton, potential fabricated claims by attorney Mr. Edwards, the value of claims by victims E.W., L.M., and Jane Doe, the destruction of evidence ('garbage'), sexual assaults on private planes, and the contents of flight logs involving celebrities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013354.jpg
This legal document page argues that Edwards reasonably expected Epstein to be liable for substantial punitive damages due to his history of molesting children and billionaire status. It notes that on July 6, 2010, Epstein settled civil suits with victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe to avoid trial, and discusses Epstein's attempt to link Edwards to a Ponzi scheme (involving Scott Rothstein) as an excuse for failing to settle cases for 'minimal value.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013353.jpg
This legal document page details allegations of witness tampering and harassment by Jeffrey Epstein against a victim identified as Jane Doe. It describes a specific incident on July 1, 2010, where a private investigator hired by Epstein stalked Jane Doe and flashed lights into her home, forcing her to flee to a secure location with a retired police officer. The text also references multiple exhibits regarding indictments and no-contact orders.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013334.jpg
This document outlines the timeline surrounding the violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the Jeffrey Epstein case during June and July 2008. It details how AUSA Villafaña withheld critical information from victims' attorney Brad Edwards regarding the finality of the plea agreement and its impact on federal prosecution. Consequently, Edwards filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida to enforce the rights of victims E.W. and L.M., who only learned the plea deal was finalized during a hearing on July 11, 2008.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013333.jpg
This document details the timeline in June and July 2008 when attorney Bradley Edwards was retained by victims E.W., Jane Doe, and L.M. It highlights that AUSA Villafaña failed to disclose a negotiated plea agreement that would block federal prosecution while simultaneously confirming concrete evidence of Epstein molesting minors. It also notes the U.S. Attorney's Office refusal to share collected evidence, specifically listing items confiscated from Epstein's home such as sex toys and massage equipment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013332.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal filing detailing attorney Bradley J. Edwards' representation of Epstein victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe starting in April 2008. It highlights the victims' concerns that the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office were secretly arranging a plea deal with Epstein without notifying the victims, despite previous assurances in January 2008 that the investigation was ongoing and they would be consulted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013331.jpg
This document details the Non-Prosecution Agreement signed by Jeffrey Epstein in 2007, which granted immunity to his co-conspirators, including Nadia Marcinkova. It highlights that Marcinkova allegedly participated in sex acts with minors alongside Epstein. Furthermore, the document criticizes the FBI for sending letters to victims in 2008 claiming the investigation was ongoing, despite a plea agreement having already been reached in 2007.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013326.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (House Oversight evidence) detailing sexual abuse allegations against Jeffrey Epstein. It graphically describes the rape and sexual assault of a minor referred to as [A.H.] at Epstein's home, involving the participation of Nadia Marcinkova. Paragraph 14 lists the initials of 12 additional alleged victims aged 13-17 (S.G., A.D., V.A., etc.) and cites a 'Rule 413 Notice' and the deposition of E.W.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013324.jpg
This document details multiple instances of sexual assault by Epstein against minor females, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, who were 13 or 14 years old at the time. It highlights Epstein's repeated invocation of the Fifth Amendment during depositions when questioned about these activities, and notes that the victims were brought to his home by another underage victim. The United States Attorney's Office recognized L.M. as a victim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013321.jpg
This legal memorandum page details evidence supporting attorney Edwards' conclusion that Epstein operated a 'pyramid abuse scheme' to access underage girls. It cites specific testimony from victims Jane Doe #4 and E.W., as well as a Palm Beach Police Incident Report concerning a 14-year-old victim, S.G. The document describes the recruitment payment structure ($200-$300 per recruit) and graphic details of sexual abuse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013320.jpg
This document page, stamped by House Oversight, outlines specific allegations against Jeffrey Epstein regarding the sexual assault of over 40 young girls in West Palm Beach between 2002 and 2005. It references depositions from victims 'Jane Doe,' 'L.M.,' and 'E.W.,' detailing specific acts of abuse and a recruitment scheme where L.M. was paid $200 for every underage girl she brought to Epstein, totaling over 70 girls. The document also notes Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment when asked about sexual acts with minors and cites legal precedents regarding adverse inferences in civil cases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013310.jpg
This document is a page from Brad Edwards' Opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment. It lists questions Epstein refused to answer regarding sexual assaults on private planes and the procuring of minors (L.M., E.W., Jane Doe) for prostitution, arguing that the court should draw adverse inferences of guilt from his silence. The document also begins a legal argument stating that 'Litigation Privilege' does not protect Epstein from claims of abuse of process and malicious prosecution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029860.jpg
A 2017 Palm Beach Post article reveals that Jeffrey Epstein paid a total of $5.5 million to settle lawsuits with three young women (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) represented by attorney Bradley Edwards. The specific settlement amounts ($1M, $2M, and $2.5M) were disclosed in court documents after Epstein's attorneys compelled Edwards to answer questions in a related lawsuit. The document is stamped as part of a House Oversight Committee release.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029322.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing dated September 12, 2013, arguing that adverse inferences should be drawn from Jeffrey Epstein's refusal to answer questions during legal proceedings. It lists specific questions Epstein refused to answer regarding procuring minors for prostitution, sexual assaults on private planes, and assaults on victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe. The document asserts that the reasonable inference is that these allegations are true and that Epstein's counter-claims against attorney Mr. Edwards were motivated by extortion and malice.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029321.jpg
This document is page 7 of a legal filing dated September 12, 2013, arguing that Jeffrey Epstein's use of the Fifth Amendment and obstructionist tactics (including securing lawyers for staff who recruited girls) creates an adverse inference of guilt. It states that attorney Bradley Edwards was pursuing discovery to prove Epstein was a 'serial molester' and discusses the admissibility of evidence regarding Epstein's abuse of other minors to establish modus operandi. The document cites case law supporting the use of adverse inferences in civil cases when a party refuses to testify.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029318.jpg
This document, dated September 12, 2013, appears to be a legal filing or summary defending attorney Bradley Edwards against claims made by Jeffrey Epstein. The text refutes Epstein's allegations that Edwards was involved in a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein, noting that Epstein failed to provide evidence during deposition and instead invoked attorney-client privilege. It also details that Edwards represents three victims (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) in civil suits against Epstein for sexual abuse.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029317.jpg
This document, dated September 12, 2013, appears to be page 3 of a legal summary or correspondence regarding a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein against attorney Edwards. The text details how Epstein refused to answer discovery questions regarding a victim identified as 'E.W.' and eventually dismissed his claims against Edwards just before a summary judgment hearing. The document strongly characterizes Epstein as a 'serial pedophile' who used the legal system to intimidate Edwards, who was representing three victims of sexual assault.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029315.jpg
A legal letter from Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley P.A. to mediator Alvin Capp regarding the case 'Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein.' The letter defends attorney Bradley Edwards against a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein, characterizing Epstein's suit as a 'vengeful assault' and 'extortion.' It details Epstein's allegations that Edwards conspired with Scott Rothstein to use sexual assault cases (involving victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) to fuel a Ponzi scheme.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021655.jpg
A June 10, 2009, article from The Palm Beach Post reporting on legal efforts to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's confidential non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors. Attorneys for The Post and victims (including 'E.W.') argue the public has a right to know the details of the 'unprecedented' deal that allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state charges and avoid federal prosecution. The article details the sidebar conference where the deal was originally sealed by Judge Pucillo and notes Epstein's connections to high-profile figures like Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Mr. Epstein | E.W. | $200.00 | Payment for each other underage female brought ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | E.W. | $0.00 | Reference to E.W.'s claim having 'substantial a... | View |
| 2017-10-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | E.W. | $2,000,000.00 | Settlement payment. | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity