| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Steve
|
Employment association |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
JEE
|
Client |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Steve
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
This document is a New York Law360 email newsletter dated October 10, 2018, summarizing various legal news stories, court rulings, and job openings. It includes headlines about lawsuits involving Harvard and NYU law reviews, a suicide of a former Goldman Sachs aide, and various commercial litigation cases. The document mentions 'Epstein' only in the context of a job listing for the law firm 'Epstein Becker & Green, PC'; there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
This document is an 'Access to Justice' email newsletter from Law360 dated April 20, 2020. It aggregates various legal news stories, primarily focused on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the justice system, including court closures, remote hearings, and bankruptcy issues. It is relevant to the Epstein files because it contains a summary of a recent Eleventh Circuit ruling that the Crime Victims' Rights Act protections do not arise until after a formal criminal charge is filed, which is described as a blow to Epstein's victims.
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated July 14, 2021, summarizing various legal news stories, court rulings, and job moves. It mentions Jeffrey Epstein in a brief 'People' section note about Cooley LLP hiring a former New York federal prosecutor who previously led prosecutions against Epstein and Michael Cohen. The newsletter also covers the conviction of Paul Manafort's banker, Stephen Calk, and allegations against the Serious Fraud Office (SFO).
This document is a 'Law360 White Collar' email newsletter from December 5, 2018. It details various legal news stories, including Jeffrey Epstein settling a dispute with an attorney representing his victims to avoid trial testimony. Other stories cover Michael Flynn's cooperation with the Mueller investigation, the Panama Papers indictments, and various fraud and securities cases.
This document appears to be a page from a contact list or attendee bio sheet, marked with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017585', suggesting it is part of a congressional investigation. It lists high-profile individuals from finance, technology, politics, and academia, including Henry Kravis (KKR), Garry Kasparov, and Neal Katyal, along with their professional titles and board memberships. The formatting suggests these individuals were people of interest, potential invitees to a conference, or contacts maintained by the subject of the investigation (Epstein).
This document is a contact or attendee list containing biographical details for high-profile individuals in business, technology, politics, and academia. It includes names such as Garry Kasparov, Henry Kravis, Max Levchin, and former government officials like Neal Katyal and Juliette Kayyem. The document appears to be from 2011 or later, based on the mention of a 2011 award winner.
This document appears to be the footer or final page of an email correspondence containing standard legal disclaimers and information about the law firm Hogan Lovells. It bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp (025910), indicating it is part of a larger production of documents for a congressional investigation.
An email exchange between Kathy Ruemmler and Stephen Immelt (likely Hogan Lovells) discussing Ruemmler's potential recruitment. Immelt suggests she meet Global Head of Litigation Michael Davison, but Ruemmler insists on discussing compensation first. Ruemmler also makes a side comment expressing disbelief that Chris Christie endorsed Donald Trump.
This document is an email chain from February 27, 2016. Kathy Ruemmler forwards an email from Stephen J. Immelt (CEO of Hogan Lovells) to Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) with the single comment 'Unsatisfactory'. In the original email, Immelt discusses negotiation terms for Ruemmler joining the firm, specifically noting that her compensation would fall outside their normal 'bell curve' but is justified by her potential contribution.
This page appears to be the final page of an email chain produced by the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025907). It contains a sign-off from a sender named 'Steve,' followed by standard corporate boilerplate text describing the law firm Hogan Lovells and a legal confidentiality disclaimer.
This document is the footer of an email addressed to an individual named 'Steve'. It contains two distinct confidentiality notices: one from the international law firm Hogan Lovells and a second, more personal one, stating the communication is the property of 'JEE' (likely Jeffrey E. Epstein) and providing the contact email 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The document is marked with the production number 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026380', indicating its origin from a congressional investigation.
This document is an email thread from February 2016 between Kathy Ruemmler and Stephen J. Immelt of Hogan Lovells. They are discussing a potential career move for Ruemmler to the law firm, with Immelt suggesting a meeting with Michael Davison, the global head of litigation. Ruemmler agrees but insists on discussing compensation first, citing the significance of the move. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein (as 'Jeffrey E.' from 'jeevacation@gmail.com') to Kathy Ruemmler on February 27, 2016. Epstein advises Ruemmler to 'ask for a financial proposal' and forwards her a recruitment email from Stephen J. Immelt, the CEO of the law firm Hogan Lovells. Immelt's email discusses the exceptional compensation Ruemmler would receive and mentions a 'Michael' who could provide a 'global perspective' on a case.
This document is the concluding portion of an email sent by 'Steve' from the law firm Hogan Lovells. It contains two separate confidentiality disclaimers: a standard one for the firm, and a second, more specific notice stating the communication is the 'property of JEE' (likely Jeffrey E. Epstein) and may be attorney-client privileged.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity