Sandra Day O'Connor
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Enmund
|
Judicial dissenter |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
David Brewer
|
Citation |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Supreme Court decision in Tison v. Arizona | Washington D.C. (Supreme Co... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010142.jpg
This document is page 7 of Stephen Gillers' Curriculum Vitae, filed as Exhibit A-5859 in a legal case. It details his prior employment from 1968 to 1978, including roles at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and as a judicial clerk. It also lists selected testimonies he provided to legislative bodies regarding judicial nominations and legal reform acts between 1981 and 1988.
DOJ-OGR-00009480.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on February 24, 2022, as part of a larger filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which corresponds to the Ghislaine Maxwell case). However, the content of the transcript records proceedings for 'United States of America v. David Parse,' where attorney Paul Shechtman argues for a new trial based on 'ineffective assistance of counsel.' This transcript was likely submitted in the Maxwell case as legal precedent or an exhibit regarding standards for new trials.
DOJ-OGR-00009463.jpg
This document is a professional biography or curriculum vitae for Stephen Gillers, detailing his employment history from 1968 to 1978. It lists his roles at various law firms and organizations, including his time as a judicial clerk, associate, and executive director. The document also provides a list of selected testimonies he delivered before various congressional and professional committees between 1981 and 1988 on topics such as judicial nominations and legal reform.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017395.jpg
This document appears to be page 308 of a book manuscript or legal draft (marked with WC: 191694 and dated 4.2.12) produced to the House Oversight Committee. The text presents a harsh critique of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor for writing a letter supporting the notion of the U.S. as a 'Christian nation,' arguing she relied on bigoted historical opinions by Justice David Brewer. The author discusses constitutional history, citing Jefferson, Adams, and various Supreme Court cases to argue against the 'Christian nation' concept.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017394.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript or draft (dated 4.2.12) discussing the separation of church and state in the United States. The author cites Thomas Jefferson, the Declaration of Independence, and the Treaty of Tripoli to argue against the notion of the US as a 'Christian nation,' and recounts a 1988 controversy in Arizona where Republicans attempted to pass a resolution declaring it as such.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017263.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book manuscript or legal memoir (page 176) discussing the US Supreme Court case *Tison v. Arizona*. The author (narrating in the first person) describes their reaction to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's majority opinion, initially believing they had won based on the Court's acceptance that the Tison brothers did not intend to kill. The text analyzes the legal definitions of 'intent to kill' versus 'reckless indifference' in the context of the death penalty and the felony-murder rule.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity