This document is a page from a court transcript filed on February 24, 2022, as part of a larger filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which corresponds to the Ghislaine Maxwell case). However, the content of the transcript records proceedings for 'United States of America v. David Parse,' where attorney Paul Shechtman argues for a new trial based on 'ineffective assistance of counsel.' This transcript was likely submitted in the Maxwell case as legal precedent or an exhibit regarding standards for new trials.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Parse | Defendant |
Subject of the case 'United States of America v. David Parse', present at counsel table.
|
| Nanette Davis | Attorney |
Appearing for the government.
|
| Stanley J. Okula, Jr. | Attorney |
Appearing for the government.
|
| Paul Shechtman | Defense Attorney |
Counsel for Mr. Parse, presenting oral argument.
|
| Ali Feingold | Paralegal |
Working with Mr. Shechtman on the matter.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the oral argument (unnamed in text).
|
| Sandra Day O'Connor | Supreme Court Justice (Historical) |
Referenced by Mr. Shechtman regarding the 'Strickland' case.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America |
Plaintiff in the case.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting firm listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR bates stamp).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case context.
|
"there is only one issue here which is a question of ineffective assistance of counsel."Source
"Justice O'Connor once said that Strickland was the most cited case that she ever wrote"Source
"if we get to prejudice, we should prevail."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,462 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document