Colorado
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00030526.jpg
This memo, dated January 11, 2006, is from attorney Michael Salnick to Daliah Weiss regarding an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Salnick confirms the rescheduling of a meeting with his client, Janusz Banasiak, for January 17, 2006, at Weiss's office. He also references a prior conversation where Weiss indicated she would issue a subpoena to Banasiak and requests a faxed copy of it before their meeting.
DOJ-OGR-00030478.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal letter dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. It provides a legal analysis of sex offender registration laws in New York, California, Colorado, and Florida, particularly concerning convictions from other jurisdictions. The letter highlights that courts in states like New York and California may examine the underlying conduct of an offense, rather than just its formal elements, to determine if registration is required.
DOJ-OGR-00021536.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing, likely a judicial opinion or a party's brief, dated February 25, 2022. The text analyzes Federal Rule of Evidence 606, which prohibits jurors from testifying about their deliberations to challenge a verdict. The document discusses the rule's specific exceptions, such as external influence or racial bias, in the context of the Defendant's attempt to use statements from 'Juror 50' about what another juror said. The central issue is whether these statements are barred by Rule 606 or fall under one of its exceptions.
DOJ-OGR-00016782.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion between a judge and several attorneys. The main topics are the logistics for a subpoenaed witness who has been placed 'on call' for the trial and a statement from one attorney that the defense is not expected to stipulate on an issue.
DOJ-OGR-00016781.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a conversation between a judge and several lawyers (Pagliuca, Comey, Everdell, Menninger) about witness scheduling. The discussion revolves around the absence of a scheduled witness, Ms. Dubin, a proposal to call another witness, Agent Young, and difficulties in contacting other individuals in Colorado. The judge grants the lawyers a short break to organize their witnesses before resuming the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00009059.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 24, 2022, argues that 'Juror No. 50' lacks legal standing and has no right to intervene in a criminal case. The filing references several legal precedents, including Cunningham v. Shoop and Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, to discuss juror bias and testimony, ultimately concluding that established precedent, such as in United States v. Stoerr, prevents a non-party from having a judicially recognized interest in a defendant's prosecution. The document also notes that Juror No. 50 did not truthfully answer a questionnaire, having later publicly admitted to being a victim of sexual assault.
DOJ-OGR-00010149.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a bibliography of publications by Stephen Gillers from 1993 to 1997. The listed articles, published in various legal journals and newspapers, cover topics such as legal ethics, political controversies like Whitewater and Filegate, and the Clinton administration. The document also references a mock legal appeal based on Shakespeare's Hamlet.
DOJ-OGR-00009897.jpg
This legal document is a portion of a motion filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing that the court should investigate potential misconduct by two jurors. The motion contends that Rule of Evidence 606(b) does not bar an inquiry into Juror No. 50's alleged bias and false statements, and that a second juror who alerted the New York Times about being a victim of childhood sexual abuse should also be questioned. The argument is that failing to investigate these matters violates Ms. Maxwell's constitutional rights to a fair and impartial jury.
DOJ-OGR-00009697.jpg
This document is page 5 of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It lists numerous legal cases, from 1976 to 2021, that are cited as precedent within the main document. Each entry includes the case name, its legal citation, and the page numbers where it is referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00009617.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated March 2, 2022, from attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan. Pagliuca, on behalf of his client Ghislaine Maxwell, requests an adjournment of a hearing on a Motion for New Trial, originally scheduled for March 8. The reason for the request is the unavailability of Maxwell's legal counsel, including Pagliuca, Ms. Menninger, and Ms. Sternheim, due to their mandatory participation in other lengthy trials in Colorado and New York.
DOJ-OGR-00009553.jpg
This legal document page argues that Federal Rule of Evidence 606 bars the Court from considering statements made by Juror 50 about another juror's comments during deliberations. The text outlines the rule, its specific exceptions (such as extraneous information or racial animus), and concludes that the Defendant's attempt to introduce this evidence does not meet the criteria for any exception and is therefore inadmissible.
DOJ-OGR-00002941.jpg
This document is page 7 of 239 (internally numbered 'vi') from a legal filing, Document 204 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of cases, listing legal precedents with their citations and the page numbers where they are referenced in the main document. The footer includes a Department of Justice document identifier, DOJ-OGR-00002941.
DOJ-OGR-00032405.jpg
This document contains a page from a spiral-bound message book with four phone message slips addressed to 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein). The messages record calls from 'Glen' (reporting he is in Colorado), 'Amy' (stating she will be in Palm Beach on Wednesday and asking if JE wants to see her), and two slips for 'Darren' (one including the phone number 973-597-1169). The document bears a footer indicating it is part of a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) and includes a DOJ bates number.
DOJ-OGR-00005262.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing dated October 18, 2021, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues they have received voluminous discovery materials (over 14,000 pages) from the government very recently (Oct 11-12), leaving insufficient time to review them before filing motions in limine. The document details the logistics of the hard drive deliveries to counsel in New York and Colorado, and to Ms. Maxwell at the MDC, while noting that some materials provided to Maxwell were incomplete.
DOJ-OGR-00005226.jpg
This document is a letter dated October 14, 2021, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, confirming November 15, 2021, as the deadline for Ghislaine Maxwell to file a motion under Federal Rule of Evidence 412 concerning the admissibility of evidence of an alleged victim's sexual behavior, clarifying its distinction from a motion in limine and its specific procedural requirements.
DOJ-OGR-00002888.jpg
This document is a legal letter filed on April 5, 2021, by Laura A. Menninger, counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The letter requests a one-week continuance for the arraignment on the S2 Indictment, moving it from April 16 to April 23, 2021, due to a scheduling conflict in Colorado and ongoing evidence review. The letter notes that the government does not oppose the request and mentions that the delay would allow Maxwell's family time to arrange travel to attend.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016537.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) discussing the systemic underenforcement of sexual assault laws in the United States and the failure of state criminal justice systems to adequately address the issue. It includes extensive footnotes citing legal precedents and state statutes regarding prosecutorial discretion and victim rights. The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016534.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the enforcement of public corruption laws, highlighting the federal government's aggressive role compared to state efforts. It details the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section and the FBI's prioritization of corruption cases, noting that federal enforcement often targets broad interpretations of misconduct like "honest services" fraud. The footnotes provide citations related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act and various case laws concerning prosecutorial discretion and victim rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016527.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a law review article (103 Minn. L. Rev.) discussing the oversight of declination decisions in state justice systems compared to the federal system. It highlights the lack of administrative and judicial review for state prosecutors' charging decisions and details the limited exceptions and historical context through extensive footnotes citing case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026711.jpg
This document is a high-resolution photograph of the Hoover Dam taken at night or dusk. It contains a caption in the top right corner identifying the location and a Bates stamp ('HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026711') in the bottom right corner, indicating it is part of a document production for a US Congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017755.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2005 BYU Law Review article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically focusing on a victim's right to attend court proceedings and be heard. The text analyzes the rationale behind allowing victims to be present during trials and cites various state constitutions and federal rules (Rule 615). The document bears the name of attorney David Schoen in the footer and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was used as legal research or an exhibit in proceedings related to the investigation of the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, likely concerning the violation of victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026808.jpg
This document is a presentation slide (page 14) from Deutsche Bank Global Public Affairs, authored by Francis J. Kelly. It outlines a schedule of United States primary elections/caucuses spanning from January 18th to March 22nd (likely referencing the 2016 election cycle based on the 'Super Tuesday' date of March 1st). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation involving Deutsche Bank.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017631.jpg
This document is a page from a legal publication (Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology) submitted to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen. It analyzes state laws (specifically Hawaii, Colorado, Missouri, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Idaho) regarding crime victims' rights to notification and consultation prior to the filing of formal charges or plea agreements. The text serves as legal precedent or comparative analysis, likely relevant to arguments concerning the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the context of the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017567.jpg
A biographical profile page for meteorologist Joshua Wurman, detailing his academic background at MIT, his work with the Air Force and NCAR, and his founding of the Center for Severe Weather Research (CSWR). The text highlights his development of the Doppler on Wheels (DOW) program and his leadership of the VORTEX2 tornado study. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it is part of a larger body of evidence collected during congressional investigations, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's connections to the scientific community/conferences, though Epstein is not named in this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017564.jpg
This document is a detailed professional biography of Damian Woetzel, dating to late 2012. It outlines his transition from a Principal Dancer at the New York City Ballet to an arts administrator, highlighting his roles as Director of the Aspen Institute Arts Program and Artistic Director of the Vail International Dance Festival. The text details various high-profile events he organized involving celebrities like Meryl Streep and Yo-Yo Ma, his appointment to the President's Committee on the Arts and Humanities by Obama, and his academic involvement with Harvard. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, linking it to congressional investigations, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named in this specific text.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity