Loretta A. Preska
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Judge litigant |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ty Gee
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-12 | N/A | Judge Loretta A. Preska issues an order regarding Ms. Maxwell's request for a stay of the unseali... | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-08-12 | Court order | Judge Loretta A. Preska denied Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's request for a three-week stay of the... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-07-29 | N/A | Filing of Docket #1078 in [Redacted] v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433-LAP): Letter addressed to Judge Lo... | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2020-07-29 | N/A | Memorandum & Order issued denying Maxwell's request for reconsideration. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-07-23 | N/A | Court decision to unseal materials. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-01 | N/A | Attorney Laura Menninger appeared for oral argument on MAXWELL's behalf. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-06-17 | N/A | Judge Preska stated she would consider Dershowitz's motion to disqualify Boies Schiller. | U.S. District Court, SDNY | View |
| 2019-06-17 | N/A | Judge Preska allowed Dershowitz's motion to be reinstated. | New York Federal Court | View |
20-3061_Documents.pdf
This document is the complete appellate record for case 20-3061, an interlocutory appeal by Ghislaine Maxwell against the United States. Maxwell appealed a District Court order denying her motion to modify a protective order, seeking permission to share confidential criminal discovery materials under seal with the judge in a related civil case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) to challenge the government's acquisition of evidence. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that the protective order decision was not a final judgment or an appealable collateral order, and denied Maxwell's motion to consolidate the criminal appeal with the civil appeal.
EFTA00030792.pdf
This document contains an email chain from July 29, 2020, discussing a new court filing in the civil case against Ghislaine Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433-LAP). Sigrid McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP alerts recipients to a letter filed by Maxwell's attorney, Ty Gee, regarding a reconsideration of a court ruling. The subsequent internal emails react strongly to the filing, with one sender calling the defense 'fucking idiots' and another stating the filing was 'ridiculous' and caused by a failure to communicate effectively.
EFTA00030155.pdf
Internal DOJ/SDNY email thread dated June 19, 2019, circulating a Law360 article about Alan Dershowitz's legal bid to disqualify the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre. The article details the conflict of interest allegations stemming from a 2015 interaction between Dershowitz and Boies Schiller partner Carlos Sires, and notes Judge Preska's decision to consider the motion. The email discussion confirms that the DOJ press office had not received inquiries from reporters about the case.
EFTA00028060.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated September 11, 2020. It orders the United States to submit an amicus brief regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate her appeal with the criminal case United States v. Maxwell (No. 20-3061) and adjourns a hearing previously scheduled for September 22, 2020.
EFTA00027729.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 29, 2020, originating from an automated PacerPro notification regarding the case '[Redacted] v. Maxwell' (Case No. 1:15-cv-07433-LAP in S.D.N.Y.). A partner at Boies Schiller Flexner LLP forwards the notification to alert recipients that Maxwell's counsel, Ty Gee, has filed a letter addressed to Judge Loretta A. Preska requesting reconsideration of a July 23 ruling.
EFTA00027034.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint' filed on December 20, 2019, in the case of Plaintiff (redacted, known to be Virginia Giuffre) v. Alan Dershowitz. Attorneys Charles J. Cooper and Haley N. Proctor of Cooper & Kirk PLLC are moving the court, specifically Judge Loretta A. Preska, for an order allowing them to amend the complaint. The document outlines the schedule for responses (due Jan 17, 2020) and replies (due Jan 24, 2020).
EFTA00026703.pdf
This document is an email from June 2019 forwarding a Law360 article about the legal battle between Alan Dershowitz and the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The article details Dershowitz's attempt to disqualify the firm from representing his accuser, Virginia Giuffre, citing a conflict of interest stemming from a 2015 interaction with partner Carlos Sires. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska ruled that Dershowitz could pursue the disqualification bid, reinstating a motion she had previously removed for procedural reasons.
EFTA00018663.pdf
This document is an application for a search warrant and a supporting affidavit filed on July 1, 2020, in the United States District Court for the District of New Hampshire. It seeks to use a cell-site simulator to locate a cellular device (the 'Target Cellular Device') believed to be used by GHISLAINE MAXWELL, who is a subject of an arrest warrant for crimes including conspiracy and enticement/transportation of minors. The FBI has probable cause to believe the device is currently in New Hampshire and that its location will assist in arresting Maxwell, based on prior GPS and cell site data, AT&T records, and contact with her attorney's phone.
EFTA00018294.pdf
This document is a Memorandum & Order from Judge Loretta Preska dated July 29, 2020, denying Ghislaine Maxwell's request to reconsider the unsealing of her deposition transcripts and those of 'Doe 1'. Maxwell argued that her recent arrest and indictment were new developments requiring secrecy, but the court ruled these risks were already considered ('plowed ground') and that she failed to raise these specific objections in a timely manner after her arrest. The court granted a brief stay until July 31, 2020, to allow Maxwell to appeal, with unsealing scheduled for August 3, 2020, absent further orders.
EFTA00017070.pdf
Judge Loretta Preska denied Ghislaine Maxwell's request to reconsider the unsealing of her deposition transcripts, ruling that her recent arrest was not a valid new ground for reconsideration as she had failed to raise it during the weeks prior to the court's original decision. The court noted that the potential for criminal charges had already been weighed in the original unsealing order. A short stay was granted until August 3, 2020, to allow Maxwell to appeal to the Court of Appeals before the documents are released.
DOJ-OGR-00019326.jpg
This document is the final page of a court order from the Southern District of New York, signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on August 12, 2020. The order addresses a request by Ms. Maxwell for a 'stay of the unsealing process,' stating that she may renew this request if the protective order in a parallel criminal action is modified to allow disclosure of relevant information. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00019325.jpg
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 12, 2020, in the civil case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Loretta A. Preska denies Defendant Maxwell's request for a three-week stay on the unsealing of documents, a request she based on the emergence of "critical new information" related to her separate criminal case. The court ruled that since Maxwell is bound by a protective order and cannot disclose this information, her unproven assertion ('ipse dixit') is not a compelling reason to grant the stay.
DOJ-OGR-00019323.jpg
A letter to Judge Loretta A. Preska from Laura A. Menninger regarding procedural requests for the unsealing of documents in the case involving Ms. Maxwell. The letter proposes amendments to the unsealing protocol to prevent errors, requests a 7-day window for appeals to the Second Circuit, and suggests a specific list of five docket entries for the next round of review.
DOJ-OGR-00019322.jpg
This document is a letter from Ms. Maxwell's legal counsel to Judge Loretta A. Preska requesting a temporary stay of the unsealing process and discussing procedural agreements. It outlines proposals to streamline the unsealing process, such as notifying non-parties simultaneously and shortening objection timelines for original parties, while also requesting a 15-page limit for future objections.
DOJ-OGR-00019288.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled "Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion to Consolidate Appeals," submitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on September 10, 2020. The motion concerns two separate appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell as the Defendant-Appellant: one from a civil case (15-CV-7433) brought by Virginia L. Giuffre, and another from a criminal case (20-CR-330) brought by the United States of America, both originating from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00003035.jpg
This document is a page from a 2021 court filing detailing the procedural history regarding the unsealing of documents in the Giuffre v. Maxwell civil case. It describes Magistrate Judge Netburn's 2019 denial of a Government application to modify a protective order, citing a lack of compelling need, and notes the subsequent reassignment of the case to Judge Preska, who ordered materials unsealed in July 2020.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity