Guy Burgess
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-01-01 | Court case | The ruling in Burgess v. United States, 552 U.S. 124, 131 n.3. | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Legal case | The Supreme Court ruled in Burgess v. United States. | Supreme Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021705.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing that argues for a broad interpretation of "sexual abuse" under Section 3283. It cites multiple federal court cases to support the position that the term covers a wide range of offenses, including those without actual physical contact, as intended by Congress. The argument is used to justify that charges like transportation of a minor for an illegal sex act (Count Four) fall within this definition.
DOJ-OGR-00002998.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing, analyzes the definition of "sexual abuse" under federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. ยง 3509(a). It argues for a broad interpretation by citing several court cases, including decisions from the Supreme Court and various Circuit Courts. The document emphasizes that the definition is not limited to physical sexual contact but also includes actions like persuasion and inducement, and that the statutory examples are illustrative rather than exhaustive.
DOJ-OGR-00005869.jpg
This document is page 2 of an exhibit filed on October 29, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains the first page of an academic article titled 'The Construct of Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse: Conceptual and Measurement Issues' published in the Journal of Child Sexual Abuse in 2014. The text defines grooming as a 'seduction stage' used to gain access to victims and discusses the need for a scientific definition of the term. It bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00005869).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019630.jpg
This document is page 142 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, stamped as a House Oversight Committee exhibit. It analyzes Edward Snowden's flight to Russia, comparing it to Cold War spies like Kim Philby to suggest a potential prior intelligence connection. The text disputes Snowden's claim that he was 'trapped' in Russia, detailing how the State Department attempted to facilitate his return to the U.S. to face felony charges, including a specific detail about a typographical error regarding his middle name (James vs. Joseph) in communications with Hong Kong authorities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020385.jpg
This document is a page of endnotes from a publication, detailing sources of information regarding the Edward Snowden case between 2013 and 2015. It cites interviews, media reports, and official statements concerning the revocation of Snowden's passport, his interviews from Russia, and commentary from officials. The document is exclusively about Edward Snowden and contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity