| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Donor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
Evidence photograph depicting an interior hallway with a distinctive black and white checkered floor. The hallway contains a large white art panel on the left wall and glass paneling on the right. In the background, cardboard boxes are stacked, one of which appears to bear the 'Crate & Barrel' logo. The image is marked with the identifier EFTA00000410 in the bottom right corner.
This document contains a transcript of an interview or deposition involving Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche. Maxwell discusses Jeffrey Epstein's past relationships, including his dating Eva Andersson in the '80s, and his connections with members of the British Royal Family, specifically Prince Andrew, Sarah Ferguson, and Princess Diana. She clarifies that she did not introduce Epstein to Prince Andrew or Sarah Ferguson, attributing Prince Andrew's meeting with Epstein to Lynn Forester and a prior trip to the Bahamas with Sarah Ferguson.
This document is an index or keyword list, likely from a deposition transcript or similar legal document, indicated by the 'MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES' branding and the page:line number format. It lists various words alphabetically, followed by numerical references, which typically denote page and line numbers where those words appear in a larger text. The document includes common words, proper nouns like 'Ayotte', 'Barak', 'Barr', 'Barclays', 'Barings', and locations such as 'Bahamas', 'Australia', and 'Beach'.
This document is a Certificate of Good Standing issued by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts for attorney Martin G. Weinberg. It certifies that Weinberg was admitted to the bar on April 24, 1972, and remained in good standing as of July 11, 2019. The document was filed on July 15, 2019, as part of Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein), likely to establish Weinberg's credentials to represent a party in that case.
This document is a shopping or inventory list dated February 14, 2005. It is divided into two sections, 'Miscellaneous' and 'Household products', listing various food items and a comprehensive range of brand-name cleaning and household supplies. The page is numbered 32 and includes a Department of Justice (DOJ) document identifier.
This is a letter dated February 22, 2007, from the law firm Atterbury Goldberger Weiss, representing Jeffrey Epstein, to Lanna Belohlavek of the Office of the State Attorney. The letter follows up on a previous meeting and lists eleven specific items of evidence, such as interview transcripts, call logs, and voicemails involving individuals like Haley Robson, Melissa Eaton, and Johanna Sjoberg, that the law firm has determined are missing from the discovery materials provided to them. This document highlights a formal request for missing evidence in the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein.
This is a letter dated December 21, 2007, from attorney Jack A. Goldberger to Judge Sandra McSorley regarding the criminal case 'State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein'. Goldberger submits an agreed motion and a proposed order to continue the trial, cancel an upcoming plea conference, and schedule a new status conference. The letter requests the judge's signature to approve these changes to the case schedule.
This document is page 65 of a heavily redacted contact list, bearing a Department of Justice document number. It contains entries for several individuals, including Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, and Joseph & Florina Rueda. The list also includes various organizations and locations such as hotels, clubs, and businesses, suggesting a network of contacts and places of interest associated with the owner of the list.
This document is page 10 of a legal brief (Case 22-1426, filed 07/27/2023) arguing legal precedents for 'third-party beneficiary' standing in non-prosecution and plea agreements. It cites multiple cases (*Stolt-Nielsen*, *Florida West Int'l Airways*, *El-Sadig*, *CFW Const. Co.*) to establish that individuals not explicitly named or communicated with can still be immune from prosecution if they are intended beneficiaries of an agreement between the government and another party. This legal argument is central to the defense's claims regarding the 2007 Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement.
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Document 87, Case 22-1426) dated July 27, 2023. It contains a Table of Authorities listing various legal precedents (cases) and the page numbers on which they appear in the full brief. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00021746).
This document is page 22 of a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) dated April 6, 2012. It contains a numbered list of publications authored by Stephen Gillers between 1986 and 1988. The articles, published in various newspapers and law journals, cover topics such as legal ethics, lawyer discipline, and commentary on legal figures like Bernhardt Goetz, Meese, and Roy Cohn.
This document appears to be a page from the curriculum vitae or bibliography of Stephen Gillers, filed as an exhibit in court cases (including Case 1:20-cr-00330). It lists numbered publications (items 15 through 34) written by Gillers between January 1986 and June 1988, published in various legal and news outlets such as the New York Law Journal and The New York Times. The articles cover topics regarding legal ethics, lawyer discipline, and specific public figures like Bernhardt Goetz and Roy Cohn.
This document is a page from a professional resume or curriculum vitae for Stephen Gillers, detailing his public lectures and service activities. It lists his participation in PBS series, numerous lectures on legal ethics, and significant roles within the American Bar Association and as a consultant for the New Jersey Supreme Court. The activities span from 1989 to at least 2009, highlighting a long career in legal ethics and public service.
This document is a court transcript of testimony from a witness named Ms. Brune. She is being questioned about communications she had with defense counsel after receiving a copy of a letter from Ms. Conrad. Ms. Brune states these were 'joint defense communications' and recounts becoming upset by a jury note, after which her colleague, Ms. Edelstein, verified a phone number from the letter on the Bar website.
This is a handwritten note from "Jack" (likely attorney Jack A. Goldberger) to "Barry" on the law firm's letterhead. Jack provides the phone number for an individual named Acosta and asks Barry to find out what Acosta says, because Jay Lefkowitz needs to call Acosta to finalize an unspecified matter. The note also mentions an enclosed document described as "fun reading on your Defendnt".
The document is a news digest containing two articles. The first discusses the boom in U.S. oil transportation, highlighting the shift from pipelines to rail and barge, regulatory challenges in Washington state, and safety concerns following the Lac-Mégantic rail disaster in Quebec. The second article summarizes a scientific study published in Nature regarding the vulnerability of the U.S. electrical grid. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a production related to an investigation.
This document is the third and final page of a printed web article from Barron's titled 'An Inside Look at Rockefeller & Co.', dated November 14, 2017. The page primarily consists of website footer content, including links to other articles, subscription prompts, customer service links, and legal policies. It bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012101.
This document is a page from the attendee list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists high-profile individuals from global business, politics, and academia, including corporate CEOs (Google, Credit Suisse, Wal-Mart), government officials (Mayor of Mexico City, Russian Federation aides), and royalty. Notably, the list includes 'H.R.H. Duke of York' (Prince Andrew), a known associate of Jeffrey Epstein, listed in his capacity as UK Special Representative for International Trade and Investment. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017072.
This document is a page from a Federal Supplement (legal opinion) regarding civil litigation stemming from the September 11 attacks. It discusses motions to dismiss filed by Saudi defendants, specifically Prince Sultan and Prince Turki, as well as the National Commercial Bank, in cases alleging they provided material support to al Qaeda. The text details procedural history involving the transfer of cases between the District of Columbia and the Southern District of New York, and mentions a $4.5 billion claim by insurance companies.
This document is page 765 of a Federal District Court opinion (S.D.N.Y.) dated January 18, 2005, regarding litigation stemming from the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001). The text discusses jurisdictional issues concerning a defendant named 'Privatbank' and dismisses claims against individual defendants Horath and Buchmann. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, often associated with investigations into financial institutions (like Deutsche Bank) that may overlap with Epstein investigations, this specific page contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir (draft dated 2012) recounting the narrator's time clerking for Judge Bazelon in the early 1960s. It details the Judge's demanding nature regarding work hours, the narrator's success on the DC bar exam, the birth of his son Jamin, and the Judge's pessimistic reaction to the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962. The narrator is likely Alan Dershowitz, given the biographical details (Yale Law, clerkship with Bazelon, son named Jamin).
This document is a Certificate of Service signed by attorney Jack Scarola on November 4, 2010. It certifies that copies of a preceding legal filing were served via Fax and U.S. Mail to a service list. The document lists the contact information for the law firm Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley and bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010607.
This document is a page from a legal filing involving Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Edwards. It details disputes over the depositions of Tommy Mattola, David Copperfield, and Bill Richardson. The text alleges Copperfield was a frequent guest at Epstein's home and was accused of improper sexual touching by one of Epstein's victims, while Richardson is linked to visits at Epstein's New Mexico ranch where young girls were present.
This document contains pages 152 and an unnumbered page from a book (likely 'Filthy Rich' by James Patterson) labeled with a House Oversight evidence stamp. It details the editorial process behind Vicky Ward's Vanity Fair profile 'The Talented Mr. Epstein,' noting that editor Graydon Carter removed content about 'young women' because Epstein was 'sensitive' about it. The text also introduces Todd Meister, a hedge-fund manager, who speaks about his relationship with Epstein.
This document is a page from a legal filing (2012 WL 257568) related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation. It details allegations against financial institutions Dallah al Baraka, ABID Corp, and DMI Trust (and individual Kamel) regarding their long-term financial support of Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, dating back to the early 1980s. The text describes money laundering, the maintenance of bank accounts for terrorist front organizations, and the facilitation of funds transfers to operatives in Europe and Sudan. The document bears a House Oversight stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023390).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity