| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Brad Edwards
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Wendy Olsen
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Criminal |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
juror
|
Shared experience |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Other victims
|
Recruitment |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Interaction |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Interaction |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Perpetrator victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional prosecutor affected parties |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Boise
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Glassman
|
Professional counsel for |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Bail hearing | A bail hearing is mentioned where victims have the opportunity to testify. | court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein asked and enticed victims to recruit other girls | Florida | View |
| N/A | Trip | Victims traveling to meet the defendant and Epstein. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A potential trial in the United States for Ms. Maxwell, which is argued to be in the best interes... | United States | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sex trafficking scheme | Two states | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims' lawsuit against Dershowitz | Legal proceedings (mentione... | View |
| N/A | Crime | A years-long scheme to sexually abuse underage girls, involving recruitment, payment, and exploit... | New York and Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | Crime | Commercial sex acts with victims who were paid for 'massage' appointments, as charged in Count Five. | Florida | View |
| N/A | Hearing | A bail hearing is mentioned where victims have been given the opportunity to testify. | court | View |
| N/A | Grand jury proceedings | Grand jury testimony was offered in connection with charges proposed against Epstein and Maxwell.... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | Maxwell's trial, during which certain aspects and subject matters of the grand jury transcripts b... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Civil litigation | Some victims made their factual accounts public in the course of civil litigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal process | A potential claims resolution program involving Jeffrey Epstein's Estate. | U.S. Virgin Islands | View |
| N/A | Meeting | The CEOS Trial Attorney had meetings with some of the victims after the NPA was signed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Criminal conspiracy/scheme | A criminal scheme discussed in court where Sarah Kellen worked as an assistant for Maxwell and Ep... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Abuse scheme operation | Defendant and Epstein normalized bodily contact and commonly instigated instances of sexual abuse... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) not disclosed to victims | N/A | View |
| 2025-12-01 | N/A | FBI agents hand-delivered letters to victims while conducting interviews. | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Federal judge ruled the plea deal violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. | U.S. District Court | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Murders of two known figures | Dubai | View |
| 2025-11-01 | N/A | FBI interviews potential witnesses and victims. | Florida, New York, New Mexico | View |
| 2025-08-06 | N/A | Government moved to unseal grand jury materials without providing notice to victims. | Court | View |
| 2025-08-05 | Legal deadline | Due date for submissions from victims and defendant Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2025-08-05 | N/A | Submission of five letters | Court Docket | View |
| 2025-08-05 | Deadline | Deadline set by the Court for the defendants and victims to set out their positions on the unseal... | United States District Cour... | View |
Page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, related to Ghislaine Maxwell) detailing the protocol for handling 'Confidential Information' during discovery. It defines such information as including the identities of victims and witnesses, while noting that publicly self-identified victims are not confidential. It also establishes a mechanism for Defense Counsel to challenge the Government's confidentiality designations.
This document is page 2 of a government filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 24, 2022. The Government argues that victims have a right to be heard at sentencing and opposes the defendant's request to redact victim impact statements, citing that privacy interests belong to the victims, not the defendant. The filing cites legal precedents (Eberhard, Lugosch) regarding the Court's discretion to accept information and the standards for sealing documents.
This document is page 2 of a court order from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 21, 2022. It establishes deadlines for filing objections and non-objected statements on June 24, 2022. Crucially, it orders the Government to confirm by noon on June 22, 2022, that victims have been notified of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).
This document is page 165 of a legal filing (Document 204) from April 2021 in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion to sever Counts Five and Six, stating that the perjury charges and sex abuse charges are logically connected by a common scheme. The text cites Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8(a) and various case precedents to support the joinder of offenses.
This document is a page from a confidential grand jury transcript filed on May 25, 2021. A witness is questioned about eight previously discussed victims, specifically regarding whether they had histories of illicit drug use or mental health issues. The witness confirms knowledge of these issues, but the specific details provided in the answer are fully redacted.
This page from a legal filing (Document 397 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) outlines the Government's argument for admitting evidence of rape. The prosecution rebuts defense claims that such evidence is irrelevant or overly inflammatory (Rule 403), asserting that the victims' testimony is necessary to explain the complex, multi-year relationships between the defendant, Epstein, and the victims. The text clarifies that the Indictment charges conspiracies for 'sexual activity' and 'commercial sex acts,' not merely 'sexualized massages' as the defense suggested.
This legal document is a preliminary statement from the Government, filed on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government submits nine motions in limine to the Court, seeking to set the rules for an upcoming trial. The motions aim to protect victims' privacy, admit certain statements, and preclude the defense from introducing what the Government considers irrelevant, confusing, or improper evidence and arguments, such as questioning law enforcement decisions or attempting to garner sympathy for the defendant.
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecution outlines its case against an unnamed defendant, alleging their involvement with Jeffrey Epstein in the abuse of underage victims. The statement details the evidence to be presented, including testimony from victims' relatives, Epstein's pilots and staff, and law enforcement who searched Epstein's Palm Beach and New York residences, to establish the defendant's role and efforts to create a 'culture of silence'.
This document is page 95 of a court transcript from the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on July 22, 2022. The judge rejects Maxwell's claims regarding poor treatment at the MDC and lack of preparation time, noting a pattern of dishonesty and 'deflection of blame' consistent with her perjury in a civil deposition. While acknowledging that Maxwell and her attorney Ms. Sternheim expressed sympathy for the victims' suffering, the judge emphasizes that Maxwell failed to express acceptance of responsibility.
This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The judge outlines the rationale for a substantial sentence, citing the gravity of the offense, the harm to victims, and the need for general deterrence against sexual abuse and trafficking of minors. The judge emphasizes that Maxwell's wealth and status do not place her above the law.
This document is page 212 from a book authored by James Patterson, likely 'Filthy Rich', which has been included in House Oversight Committee records (Bates stamp 010552). It features a statement signed by former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta defending the prosecutorial decisions made in the Epstein case, arguing that critics were not privy to the specific evidence and trial assessments made at the time.
This document is a timeline, likely from a Miami Herald article included in House Oversight records, detailing the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein between May 2008 and July 2009. It covers his guilty plea to state solicitation charges, his 18-month sentencing, the subsequent work release program where he spent 12 hours a day at his office, and his early release in 2009. The text also highlights the Miami Herald's investigative work ('Perversion of Justice') in exposing the deal and the lack of notification provided to victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Damages pursuant to 18 USC 2255. | View |
| N/A | Received | [Redacted Female ... | victims | $0.00 | Financial incentives offered for not speaking w... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Agreement to a means for victims to obtain mone... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Monetary damages for victims mentioned as a req... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to 'settlement payments made ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Agreement to pay attorney fees for victims and ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Mention of 'significant monetary settlements to... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/A... | victims | $0.00 | Victims were paid 'hundreds of dollars' after a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein, Maxwell,... | victims | $0.00 | Cash payments made in connection with each sexu... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Reference to potential monetary damages victims... | View |
| N/A | Paid | victims | Scammers | $250,000.00 | Example amount cited by Epstein regarding how t... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Paid millions of dollars in civil compensation ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Cash settlements in civil suits requiring non-d... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $200.00 | Typical payment per visit for massage sessions ... | View |
| N/A | Received | The Defendant | victims | $0.00 | Promised to help pay for school as part of groo... | View |
| N/A | Received | Restitution Mecha... | victims | $150,000.00 | Mentioned by Sloman as a restitution amount tha... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein/Maxwell | victims | $0.00 | Giving them money and gifts (general mention) | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Cash settlements in civil suits. | View |
| N/A | Received | Compensation Fund | victims | $0.00 | Reference to a compensation fund or incentive f... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | NPA requirement to provide monetary damages/unc... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein/Maxwell (... | victims | $0.00 | Juror mentions victims 'returning repeatedly fo... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Confidential financial settlements reached afte... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Restitution made to victims as part of the nego... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Potential damages paid to victims who elect to ... | View |
Notification letters issued to victims.
Standard form language stating the case was 'under investigation' and failing to inform them of the NPA.
USAO and FBI letters were hand-delivered to some victims following in-person interviews to notify them of their rights.
FBI victim notification letters sent in 2006, 2007, and 2008, identifying recipients as possible victims of a federal crime.
OPR reviewed written submissions from victims concerning their contacts with the USAO and the FBI.
Drafted to notify victims identified in the federal investigation of the pending state plea proceeding and invite them to appear.
The Court notes that it has not received any letters from the victims setting out their positions.
The transcript describes Sarah Kellen's role in earlier years as 'calling victims and arranging for massage appointments.'
A pamphlet that provided an overview of the Victim Notification System (VNS) and instructions on how to access it.
OPR considered whether letters sent by the FBI to victims after the NPA was signed contained false or misleading statements.
An FBI pamphlet containing CVRA rights information was provided to victims when a letter was not.
The document describes overall communications with victims as inconsistent, confusing, and not prioritized, leading to victims feeling ignored and frustrated.
The document describes overall communications with victims as inconsistent, confusing, and not prioritized, leading to victims feeling ignored and frustrated.
An FBI victim letter asserted that the case was “currently under investigation,” a statement Villafaña and an FBI case agent later defended to OPR as accurate.
Alleged 'highly improper and unusual 'victim notification letter'' that defense counsel argued constituted professional misconduct.
FBI reports from victim interviews primarily focused on the facts of Epstein's abuse, not the status of the prosecution.
Villafaña interviewed victims, telling them the case was 'back under investigation' to prepare for a federal trial.
OPR considered whether letters sent by the FBI to victims after the NPA was signed contained false or misleading statements.
OPR contacted attorneys representing 26 victims to invite them regarding the monetary damages provision of the NPA.
A letter was sent to victims to correct a reference to the December letter. The September letter contained information about the parties' intent in implementing 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and Epstein's agreement to pay attorney fees.
A letter was sent to victims to correct a reference to the December letter. The September letter contained information about the parties' intent in implementing 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and Epstein's agreement to pay attorney fees.
Sarah Kellen's tasks included 'calling victims and arranging for massage appointments'.
Victims have conveyed to the Government that any form of release for Mr. Epstein, including home detention, could result in their harassment and abuse.
A pamphlet provided to victims by FBI agents that contained a listing of the eight CVRA rights and explained the role of the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Chat logs on myspace.com used by defense lawyers.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity