United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-29 | Legal proceeding | A second superseding indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell was issued. | Southern District of New York | View |
EFTA00030763.pdf
This document is a blank Declaration of Custodian of Records form intended to authenticate an AT&T Wireless invoice dated May 5, 2004, for account number 0043811863 belonging to Jeffrey E. Epstein. It is prepared for use in an investigation and prosecution by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The form cites Federal Rules of Evidence but has not yet been signed or dated by a declarant.
DOJ-OGR-00015040.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed by the U.S. Attorney General's office, arguing that the Court should release grand jury transcripts from the Epstein and Maxwell cases. The motion contends that public interest, coupled with the diminished privacy interests following Epstein's death, justifies this release, despite Maxwell's case being pending before the Supreme Court.
DOJ-OGR-00014854.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal opinion (likely from an appellate court) affirming the conviction and sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court holds that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida does not prevent the Southern District of New York from prosecuting Maxwell, and confirms that the statute of limitations was not violated. The document also notes Maxwell was fined a total of $750,000 and denied a new trial regarding juror conduct.
DOJ-OGR-00014852.jpg
This legal document is a court opinion regarding the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's June 29, 2022, conviction for conspiracy, transportation of a minor for criminal sexual activity, and sex trafficking. Maxwell's appeal raised five issues, including whether Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement barred her prosecution and other procedural matters. The court found no errors in the District Court's handling of the case and affirmed the judgment of conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00000735.jpg
This legal document, page 4 of a court filing, argues for the release of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein and Maxwell cases due to public interest and diminished privacy concerns following Epstein's death. The Department of Justice commits to redacting victim-identifying information before release. The document is submitted by Pamela J. Bondi, U.S. Attorney General, and Todd Blanche, Deputy Attorney General.
DOJ-OGR-00000005.jpg
This page from a legal document outlines the issues presented on appeal regarding the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell, including arguments concerning Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, and juror impartiality. The court summarizes its holdings, stating that the NPA did not bind the prosecution in New York, the statute of limitations was not violated, and the motion for a new trial based on juror conduct was properly denied.
DOJ-OGR-00000003.jpg
This legal document is a court opinion dated September 17, 2024, regarding the appeal of Ghislaine Maxwell's June 29, 2022, conviction. The document outlines the five legal questions Maxwell raised on appeal, including issues related to Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, the statute of limitations, and jury conduct. The appellate court found no errors in the District Court's proceedings and affirmed Maxwell's conviction and sentence.
DOJ-OGR-00020927.jpg
This document is page 15 of a completed juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The juror indicates they have no professional, business, or social association with the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York or the FBI.
DOJ-OGR-00020608.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal motion filed on January 16, 2023, in Case 22-1426 (United States v. Maxwell appeal). The defense is requesting permission to file an oversized brief of 20,000 words, citing the complexity of the case, a 3,000-page trial transcript, and specific legal issues regarding evidentiary rulings, juror misconduct, and a non-prosecution agreement. The filing notes that the US Attorney's Office for the SDNY (specifically AUSAs Rohrbach, Pomerantz, Moe, and Comey) has been notified via email.
DOJ-OGR-00021881.jpg
This document is page 4 of an appellate court decision (likely 2nd Circuit) dated December 2, 2024, affirming the conviction and sentence of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court holds that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida did not prevent the Southern District of New York from prosecuting Maxwell. Additionally, the court affirms that the indictment was within the statute of limitations and that the District Court correctly denied a motion for a new trial regarding juror misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00021879.jpg
This document is Page 2 of an appellate court decision filed on December 2, 2024, affirming the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court rejected Maxwell's five arguments on appeal, including her claim that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement in Florida protected her from prosecution in New York. The court affirmed the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction for sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.
DOJ-OGR-00021851.jpg
This is page 4 of a legal opinion (Case 22-1426) affirming the conviction and sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The court holds that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement in Florida does not protect Maxwell from prosecution in New York, affirms that the indictment complied with the statute of limitations, and denies that a juror's erroneous answers during voir dire warranted a new trial. The document notes Maxwell was fined a total of $750,000.
DOJ-OGR-00021849.jpg
This page is from an appellate court decision affirming the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her sentence (concurrent terms totaling 240 months) for sex trafficking and conspiracy charges. The court rejects her five grounds for appeal, which included arguments about Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, statute of limitations, and jury impartiality.
DOJ-OGR-00021796.jpg
This document is page 2 of an appellate court opinion affirming the conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the charges she was convicted of (sex trafficking, conspiracy), her sentence (concurrent terms up to 240 months), and rejects five specific arguments raised on appeal, including the applicability of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and claims of jury bias. The court concludes by affirming the District Court's June 29, 2022 judgment.
DOJ-OGR-00009081.jpg
This document is page 14 of a juror questionnaire for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on February 24, 2022. Juror ID 50 indicates they have no professional, business, or social associations with either the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).
DOJ-OGR-00009903.jpg
This document is the cover page for Volume XVI of a legal appendix filed on February 24, 2022, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for case number 13-1388-cr. The case is an appeal by Defendant-Appellant David Parse and others against the United States of America. The document identifies the parties involved and lists the legal counsel for both the government (Appellee) and the appellant David Parse.
DOJ-OGR-00005349.jpg
This document is page 27 of a jury questionnaire (Document 367) filed on October 22, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains questions 26 through 28, asking potential jurors to disclose any bias against federal law enforcement (DOJ, FBI), the NYPD, or U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, as well as general opinions on prosecutors and defense attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00005348.jpg
This document is page 26 of a juror questionnaire for federal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. It contains questions designed to identify potential conflicts of interest or bias by asking a prospective juror about their associations with law enforcement and legal entities. Specifically, it inquires about connections to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, the FBI, and the NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00005319.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing containing instructions to potential jurors regarding the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines the trial schedule, explains the nature of the charges involving Jeffrey Epstein, defines the burden of proof, and issues preliminary instructions restricting media consumption about the case.
DOJ-OGR-00005314.jpg
This document is page 38 of 40 from a court filing (Document 365) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains proposed voir dire questions (15-20) designed to screen potential jurors for bias regarding the government (DOJ, FBI, NYPD), the legal system, and wealthy individuals. The questions specifically ask if jurors have opinions on 'people who are wealthy or have luxurious lifestyles' that would affect their impartiality.
DOJ-OGR-00005292.jpg
This document is page 16 of a juror questionnaire from a federal criminal case, filed on October 22, 2021. It poses questions to a potential juror to determine if they have any personal or professional associations with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The questionnaire also seeks to understand if any such relationships would impact their ability to serve as a fair and impartial juror.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity