33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00032729.pdf
This document is an email chain from June 16, 2021, between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials. Sternheim complains about technical issues in the VTC room hindering attorney-client communication and alleges inappropriate behavior by guards, including 'barking orders' and 'officiousness.' The BOP official responds by explaining VTC storage protocols, noting that Maxwell has declined daily medical care offers, and requesting a photo of ear buds Sternheim wishes to bring in.
EFTA00032727.pdf
An email chain from June 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and prison officials (forwarded to USANYS). Sternheim complains about poor VTC quality affecting attorney-client privilege and alleges inappropriate/harassing behavior by guards towards Maxwell. The prison official responds that VTC units are stored for protection, Maxwell must obey orders, and notes that Maxwell consistently declines daily medical care offers.
EFTA00032724.pdf
An email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim complains about technical issues in the VTC room impeding attorney-client communication and alleges inappropriate and threatening behavior by the guards assigned to Maxwell's detail.
EFTA00032722.pdf
An email chain from June 16, 2021, in which attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim lodges a formal complaint regarding conditions affecting her client, Ghislaine Maxwell. The complaints focus on technical issues in the VTC room hindering attorney-client communication and specific allegations of inappropriate, threatening, and mocking behavior by detention guards toward Maxwell.
EFTA00031432.pdf
An email chain from April 2021 discussing the conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement. Her attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, requests that Maxwell be allowed to access legal materials while waiting in the cell block, noting she spent over three hours idle there that morning. The forwarding party indicates they have no objection to this request subject to Marshal approval.
EFTA00030925.pdf
This document is a footer or signature page from a communication sent by the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim. It contains contact information, a Covid-19 notice stating the office is working remotely, and a standard legal confidentiality disclaimer. No specific case details or recipients are visible on this page.
EFTA00030880.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be given to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. She also requests that Maxwell be granted access to a government-provided laptop because standard MDC computers cannot open the necessary discovery documents, arguing that denial of access hinders Maxwell's defense. The BOP recipient responds that the legal department does not process mail and that BOP policies must be followed.
EFTA00026926.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 2021 between defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and redacted government officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement. Sternheim requests that Maxwell be allowed legal materials while waiting in the cell block, noting she was held idle for over three hours. The government responds that they do not object but that the US Marshals require a court order.
EFTA00026460.pdf
This document represents an email thread between defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim and an official at MDC Brooklyn regarding the confinement status of Ghislaine Maxwell on November 19, 2020. The official informs Sternheim that Maxwell was placed in quarantine (not the SHU) for 14 days after close contact with a staff member who tested positive for COVID-19, resulting in the suspension of in-person legal visits.
EFTA00024992.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 involving defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim and government/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be provided to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. The correspondence also includes a request for Maxwell to have access to a government-provided laptop to review discovery materials, arguing that MDC computers are insufficient for her defense.
EFTA00023113.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 30, 2020, between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, and the Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Sternheim details complaints regarding Maxwell's detention conditions, specifically citing excessive searches, lack of privacy during showers, cold temperatures in her isolation cell due to lack of insulation and body heat from other inmates, and constant surveillance. The thread concludes with the attorneys arranging a phone call to discuss the matter.
EFTA00019933.pdf
An email chain from June 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and prison officials (likely MDC/BOP). Sternheim complains about the conditions of Maxwell's confinement, specifically alleging that guards repeatedly woke Maxwell due to shivering from cold temperatures only to subsequently confiscate her blankets. The correspondence also addresses technical failures with Video Teleconferencing (VTC) equipment hindering attorney-client preparation and alleges unprofessional behavior by guards.
EFTA00013303.pdf
This document contains an email exchange dated December 30, 2020, between an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The defense attorney complains that contrary to MDC Legal's claims, Maxwell is being subjected to strict movement restrictions within her isolation cell by guards, specifically regarding where she can stand. The email also raises issues about Maxwell not receiving menu-designated food and technical failures with a discovery disc on the MDC computer.
EFTA00010187.pdf
This document is an email thread from November 2020 involving Bobbi C. Sternheim, defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim writes to BOP officials stating that Maxwell (Inmate 02879-509) has been placed in quarantine after contact with a COVID-infected corrections officer. Sternheim requests that previously scheduled in-person legal visits for November 21 and November 28 be converted to legal calls to discuss time-sensitive matters.
EFTA00009831.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell on April 13, 2021. Sternheim inquires if the recipient can persuade the Marshal to allow Maxwell access to legal materials while in the cell block, noting that Maxwell sat idle for over three hours that morning. Sternheim suggests she may seek a Court order if the issue cannot be resolved.
DOJ-OGR-00002320(1).jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, dated January 25, 2021, for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. It lists contact information for two law firms, HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. and Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim, identifying them as attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002317(1).jpg
This legal document, dated January 25, 2021, is a memorandum filed in support of a motion for a Bill of Particulars and Pretrial Disclosures in the case against Ms. Maxwell. It argues that the indictment lacks specificity regarding alleged 'grooming' acts, violating her constitutional rights, and requests either the dismissal of certain counts or that the government provide more detailed information for her defense. The document is signed by several attorneys representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00002311(1).jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on January 25, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The memorandum, submitted by Maxwell's legal team, supports a motion to dismiss four counts of the superseding indictment against her, arguing a lack of specificity. The document identifies Maxwell as the defendant and lists her attorneys from three different law firms.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity