Richard
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Brune
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
attorneys for Bruce & Richard
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brune
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author (Clarisse)
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. SCAROLA
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Clarisse Thorn
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Friend |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Author
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Ambition
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Legal Deposition/Hearing | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator runs into Richard and they spend the night together. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter between author and Richard involving BDSM elements. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Phone call | Richard telephoned for 'Jeffrey Sarah'. No message was left. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The author's 'coming-out story' regarding their sexuality and BDSM. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator ran into Richard after being ignored via text. | Unknown | View |
| 2004-11-02 | Phone call | Richard called DOUG. | N/A | View |
EFTA00038925.pdf
This document contains a series of invoices and handwritten notes from a house manager (likely named Paula) for Jeffrey Epstein's West Palm Beach property between 2003 and 2005. The records detail hours worked, payments received (including cash from Ghislaine Maxwell), and coordination of maintenance, staff, and guests. Notable details include instructions to schedule repairs when Epstein and Maxwell are not present, ground transport to Jet Aviation, and specific mentions of Maxwell's desk and requirements.
EFTA00000531.pdf
A handwritten notebook page titled '301 66th St 2nd Ave Apartments' listing apartment assignments and staff contact numbers. The document assigns specific guests to apartments, notably placing 'Nili & Ehud' (likely Ehud Barak and his wife) in apartment 11J. It also lists staff members including Arina, Karyna, Merwin, and others, with their contact information redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00015493.jpg
This document consists of four telephone message slips, primarily dated January 9, 2005, recording calls for a person named Jeffrey. Three messages are from unidentified callers (at least two of whom are female) requesting callbacks, while one is from a man named Richard for 'Jeffrey Sarah'. The document is marked as a government exhibit, indicating its relevance to a legal proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00009235.jpg
This document is a table of contents (page xi) from a court filing dated February 24, 2022, listing exhibits and transcripts related to a criminal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It indexes materials from 2011 and 2012, including emails between various individuals (Viviann Stapp, Randy Kim, Suann Ingle, Kendra Melrose), jury selection materials, internal emails from 'Brune & Richard,' and transcripts of telephone conferences and new trial hearings. The document also references a supplemental memorandum of law filed by the United States opposing a motion for a new trial.
DOJ-OGR-00010131.jpg
This legal document details the events of March and May 2011 concerning the law firm Brune & Richard. The firm's lawyers, led by Trzaskoma, investigated whether a juror named Conrad was the same person as a suspended Bronx lawyer with the same name. After reviewing evidence such as voir dire answers and a Westlaw profile, they concluded the two were different people and, lacking actual knowledge or strong suspicion, had no ethical duty to disclose their findings to the court.
DOJ-OGR-00009976.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript index (concordance) dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.'. It lists words alphabetically (from 'revisit' to 'sessions') alongside their frequency counts and specific page:line citations within the transcript. While the content pertains to the Daugerdas tax fraud case, the header indicates this document was filed on March 10, 2022, as Document 646-2 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, which is the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, suggesting it was used as a legal exhibit or precedent in her trial.
DOJ-OGR-00009914.jpg
This document is page xi of a table of contents for a legal filing dated August 3, 2022. It lists various exhibits, transcripts, and legal documents related to a case, including affidavits, emails, jury selection materials, and transcripts from hearings and a conference that took place in 2011 and 2012. The entries reference several individuals, such as Brune, Viviann Stapp, Daniel Nardello, and Steven Gillers, and detail communications and legal proceedings pertinent to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00009485.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on February 24, 2022. The dialogue involves 'The Court' and attorney Mr. Shechtman discussing the conduct of lawyers named Brune and Richard. The debate centers on whether the lawyers' 'lack of candor' was due to carelessness or a strategic decision to 'game the system' and conceal information from the court.
DOJ-OGR-00009447.jpg
This document is the first page of a legal declaration by Stephen Gillers, a law professor and expert in legal ethics, filed on April 6, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Gillers outlines his extensive qualifications and states that he has been asked by the court to provide an opinion on whether the attorneys for clients named Bruce and Richard fulfilled their ethical obligations regarding the potential failure to disclose a letter and an investigation concerning 'Juror No. 1' during March, May, and July of 2011.
DOJ-OGR-00009438.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, capturing the conclusion of an evidentiary hearing. Both the defense attorneys for defendants Parse and Field, as well as the government attorney, rest their cases. The judge then instructs the parties to submit post-hearing briefs, specifically requesting they address the strongest evidence from the hearing and a key ethical question regarding the potential failure of attorneys for 'Brune & Richard' to disclose a July 21 letter and an investigation concerning Juror No. 1.
DOJ-OGR-00009310.jpg
This document is page 249 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Brune, an attorney, regarding the marketing and claims made on the website of their law firm, Brune & Richard. The questioning focuses on Brune's self-description regarding 'sound strategic choices,' 'meticulous preparation,' and 'forceful advocacy.'
DOJ-OGR-00009297.jpg
This document is a word index (concordance) page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.' It lists keywords alphabetically from 'revisit' to 'sessions', along with their frequency counts and page/line citations. The document bears a header indicating it was filed on February 24, 2022, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), suggesting it was submitted as an exhibit in that trial.
DOJ-OGR-00032479.jpg
This document consists of four telephone message slips from November 2004 for two individuals, "DOUG" and "Mr. J.E.". The messages are from various callers including Richard (an engineer from NYC), Glenn Kutsovsky of GMS Group, Steve Scoutt, and Manuel. The subjects of the calls include a request for a return call, a note about "AAA Insured 6%", and a call regarding a "Mr. Dante Ferretti".
DOJ-OGR-00032413.jpg
This document contains four scanned 'Important Message' slips from January 9 and 10, 2005. The messages are directed to Jeffrey (Epstein) and one to Jeffrey/Sarah. Callers include Paula, Natalie, Richard, and Sarah, with phone numbers (area codes 917 and 516) recorded for each.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018645.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a personal essay, blog, or memoir included in House Oversight Committee records (stamped 018645). The author reflects on their current confidence with BDSM compared to their younger self ('Clarisse' at 20). The text includes a quoted excerpt from a past journal entry detailing a specific encounter with a partner named Richard, exploring themes of consent, shame, and desire, and draws a parallel between the author's sexual exploration and a desire to travel to Africa.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018631.jpg
This document appears to be a printout of a personal blog post or narrative included in a House Oversight investigation record (Bates stamped). The narrator describes complex and somewhat cynical interpersonal relationships with two men: 'Richard,' who is dismissive, and 'Mr. Ambition,' a wealthy figure (referenced by 'billion dollars') with whom the narrator shares a dynamic involving 'confusing reactions to S&M' and emotional games. The text explores themes of emotional boundaries, transactional relationships, and communication dynamics.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018630.jpg
A narrative account, likely from a memoir or manuscript, detailing the narrator's recovery from an accident in Chicago during August. The text focuses on her interactions with 'Mr. Ambition' (a pseudonym), who cares for her during her hospital stay and recovery despite their lack of romantic chemistry and ambiguous relationship status. The document also mentions a brief email from 'Richard' following the accident.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018628.jpg
A page from a manuscript (likely Sarah Ransome's) detailing complex romantic interactions with two men referred to as 'Mr. Ambition' and 'Richard'. The narrator describes a painful conversation with Mr. Ambition about intelligence and dating, followed by a sexual encounter with Richard the next evening, during which Richard advocates for the narrator to reconcile with Mr. Ambition. The text reflects on the confusing nature of these relationships, describing the dynamic with Mr. Ambition as 'confidently ambiguous'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018625.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a memoir, novel, or personal manuscript found within the House Oversight files (marked 018625). The text is a first-person narrative by a woman named Clarisse, detailing her romantic interactions and emotional reflections regarding a man she nicknames 'Mr. Ambition,' while also referencing a past relationship with a man named Richard. The writing style is literary and introspective, focusing on themes of vulnerability, emotional strength, and relationship dynamics.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018519.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a personal memoir, blog, or essay discussing BDSM psychology, pain processing, and emotional reactions to dominance. The author reflects on an anonymous comment they received about feeling anger/hatred during BDSM scenes and relates it to their own past relationship with a partner named Richard who was emotionally unavailable. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was included in a larger cache of evidence, likely seized from a device or provided during discovery.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027009.jpg
This document is a transcript of a 2013 speech given by Israeli Minister of Defense Ehud Barak at an AIPAC conference. Barak thanks the audience, acknowledges various dignitaries including Ambassador Michael Oren, President Obama, and Secretary Panetta, and emphasizes the strong support for Israel. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation, likely related to inquiries involving Epstein's associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023325.jpg
This document contains two emails (May and August 2016) sent to Melanie Spinella, intended for Leon Black (addressed as 'Leon'). The writer (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) demands a $10 million upfront payment to continue working until January 15th. The text heavily criticizes a CEO named 'Brad' for financial incompetence, discusses estate planning and tax returns, and uses a metaphor comparing the writer's financial services to a 'work of art' that is being ruined by Leon's staff.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023313.jpg
This document is a highly critical email from October 2015, ostensibly from Jeffrey Epstein to a high-net-worth individual (contextually Leon Black), sent via Melanie Spinella. The sender lambasts the recipient's CEO, 'Brad,' for gross incompetence, financial errors, and lack of documentation regarding planes and deals. The email outlines a 'mutual goal' to end their business relationship but disputes the final payments, citing a '37 percent' agreement, and concludes with a punch-list of action items including firing specific staff (Ada, Eva, Castrucci), restructuring assets (plane, boat, Phaidon), and revising estate plans.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023311.jpg
A highly contentious email sent to Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com) on January 6, 2016. The sender (likely a high-level financial advisor or associate like Leon Black, though 'Leon' is addressed in the text, creating ambiguity) complains bitterly about a fee dispute, claiming to have saved Epstein over $600 million in taxes while only being offered $20 million in compensation. The document details complex financial maneuvers involving entities like Phaidon, BRH, and Athene, and harshly criticizes Epstein's staff, specifically Eileen Alexandersson and Brad Wechsler, for incompetence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023310.jpg
An email dated January 6, 2016, from an unnamed close associate (likely a high-level financial advisor) to Jeffrey Epstein. The sender expresses frustration that Epstein has reneged on a compensation agreement regarding a tax strategy that saved Epstein $600 million. The email details the incompetence of Epstein's previous financial managers (Eileen Alexandersson and Brad Wechsler), lists specific tax errors the sender rectified, and attempts to negotiate a settlement fee in the $50-60 million range.
Dinner Invitation
Inviting Richard for dinner
Breakup/Sign-off
Economists recognize that the most robust relationships are formed through a plethora of implicit agreements. Apparently, these agreements are not present, and probably won't be. Cheers.
Advice regarding Mr. Ambition
Richard advises the narrator that Mr. Ambition likely didn't mean to break up and she should try to make it work.
Unknown
Quick email sent after accident, followed by silence.
No Subject
A message was taken for DOUG from Richard, an engineer in NYC, at 1:30 PM. The message is 'Pls call him back'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity