| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
His lawyers (authors of the text)
|
Academic citation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Piaget
|
Academic critic |
5
|
1 |
This document is page 309 from a book or academic paper titled '17.2 Measuring Incremental Progress Toward Human-Level AGI'. The text discusses the challenges of measuring progress in Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), arguing against simple metrics like the Turing Test in favor of a competency-based approach inspired by human cognitive development. It references psychologists Piaget and Vygotsky and outlines a roadmap for defining AGI competencies. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013225', indicating it was collected as evidence by the House Oversight Committee, likely in relation to Jeffrey Epstein's known funding of and connections to the scientific community and AI research.
This document appears to be a page (p. 191) from an academic book or paper discussing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and psychology. It analyzes Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development, specifically the 'Formal' stage, and contrasts it with the theories of Vygotsky and others regarding learning continuity and social context. It references 'CogPrime' (an AGI architecture associated with Ben Goertzel) and bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013107' bates stamp, indicating it was collected as evidence, likely in the context of Epstein's connections to scientists.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity