| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Phone call coordination regarding Epstein investigation | Phone | View |
| 2020-05-04 | N/A | Scheduled call between Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and USANYS regarding Epstein document production. | Phone | View |
| 2020-04-22 | N/A | Transfer of password-protected document file from USANYS to Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP. | View | |
| 2020-02-04 | N/A | Email correspondence circulating news regarding the legal battle over Jeffrey Epstein's estate. | N/A | View |
This document is an email dated February 4, 2020, with the subject 'Estate of J. Epstein'. It was sent to a redacted recipient and copied to Kate L. Doniger. The content consists of a link to a news article reporting that a judge granted the US Virgin Islands (USVI) intervener status in the legal battle over Jeffrey Epstein's fortune.
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (Roberta Kaplan, Alex Conlon, Kate Doniger) and a redacted party. They discuss legal proceedings involving the Epstein Estate, specifically criticizing a 'draft protocol' received from Feinberg as a 'disaster' and referencing filings in the USVI. Notable discussions include a court transcript where it was stated that Epstein's brother is the sole beneficiary of the estate, and Judge Failla's comment regarding claims potentially worth 'millions upon millions of dollars.'
This document is an email chain from early 2020 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (representing a party litigating against Jeffrey Epstein's estate) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence involves the submission of a 'Touhy letter' by the private firm to request documents from the Department of Justice regarding Epstein. The emails track the initial request in January, the formal submission in February, and a follow-up check-in during April 2020.
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between the administrators of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (Jordy Feldman) and legal counsel for the victims (Roberta Kaplan's firm). The correspondence centers on the victims' counsel challenging the independence of the program, arguing that because the administrators were hired and paid by the Epstein Estate, they cannot be neutral. Kaplan's team proposes adding a fourth administrator selected by the plaintiffs to ensure fairness.
An email chain from December 2019 involving attorneys from Kaplan Hecker & Fink, Troutman Sanders, and Boies Schiller Flexner regarding The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence involves the forwarding of attached letters between counsel, with Roberta Kaplan forwarding the thread to an undisclosed recipient noting, 'I assume you have this.' The thread indicates ongoing legal coordination or dispute resolution concerning the Epstein Estate.
This document is an email chain between the law firm Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (representing a party suing Jeffrey Epstein's estate) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). Spanning from January to April 2020, the correspondence details the law firm's submission of a 'Touhy letter' to the DOJ to request information relevant to their litigation against the Epstein estate. The chain concludes with the US Attorney's office providing a response letter and a set of encrypted documents to the law firm.
This document is an email chain between the law firm Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) spanning January to April 2020. The law firm submitted a 'Touhy letter' requesting documents from the DOJ regarding pending litigation against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The USANYS eventually produced a set of documents and a response letter on April 21, 2020, followed by the scheduling of a phone call to discuss the production.
This document is an email chain from January and February 2020 between Roberta Kaplan (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) and an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York. The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy letter' submitted by Kaplan requesting documents from the Department of Justice for use in pending litigation against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The US Attorney's office acknowledges receipt of the request.
This document is an email exchange from May 21, 2020, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and attorney Roberta Kaplan. The AUSA requests a brief phone call to ask a 'quick question' regarding the Epstein investigation. Kaplan replies confirming that she and her colleague Kate Doniger will call the AUSA back shortly.
This email chain from December 2019 between the Kaplan Hecker & Fink legal team and redacted recipients discusses court transcripts and the administration of the Epstein Estate. Key revelations include the confirmation that Mark Epstein (Jeffrey's brother) was identified by Estate lawyers (Bennet Moskowitz) as the sole beneficiary of the estate. The emails also mention that the 'Feinberg draft protocol' (likely regarding the victim compensation fund) was received and considered a 'disaster' by Kaplan's team.
This document is an email chain from November and December 2019 between Jordy Feldman (Administrator of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program) and attorneys Roberta Kaplan and Kate Doniger (representing victims). The core conflict involves the independence of the Compensation Program; Kaplan's team argues that because the administrators were hired by the Estate, they lack independence, and proposes adding a fourth, plaintiff-selected administrator. Feldman rejects this proposal, citing the reputation and experience of his team (including Ken Feinberg and Camille Biros) and asserting the program's neutrality.
This document contains an email thread between Roberta Kaplan's law firm (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) and an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence, dated January and February 2020, concerns a 'Touhy letter' request for documents from the Department of Justice related to pending litigation (*Doe v. Indyke et al.*) against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The emails discuss scheduling a time to talk and reviewing the attached letters.
This document contains an email chain from January to April 2020 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (representing plaintiffs) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy letter' request for documents from the Department of Justice to aid in pending litigation against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The final email is a follow-up from Kate Doniger checking on the status of the request amidst the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
This document is an email chain spanning January 2020 to April 2020 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the law firm Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP. The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy letter' request submitted by the law firm for information and documents from the Department of Justice relating to Jeffrey Epstein, specifically for use in pending litigation against Epstein's estate. The chain concludes with the US Attorney's office sending a password-protected file to the law firm.
This document contains an email chain between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and attorneys from Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (Roberta Kaplan, Kate Doniger, Alexandra Conlon) spanning from January to April 2020. The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy letter' request filed by the law firm for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein to support pending litigation against his estate. The USANYS acknowledges the request and provides periodic updates on the status of their review.
Confirming receipt of production and requesting a call to discuss questions.
Thanking for production of documents and requesting a discussion call.
Confirming call time works.
Proposing call at 1:45 on Monday 05/04.
Providing password for a document file previously sent.
Sending attached letter responding to request and set of documents. Password to be sent separately.
Sending attached letter responding to request and a set of documents (encrypted).
Stating no additional info needed at this time; expects to update early next week.
Thanking the US Attorney for the update.
Thanks very much.
AUSA informs Kate that no additional information is needed at this time and hopes to provide an update early next week.
Stating no additional info is needed from the firm and hoping to provide an update early next week.
Thanking the AUSA.
Stating no additional info is needed at this time; hopes to provide update early next week.
Stating no additional info is needed at this time; hopes to provide update early next week.
Thanking USANYS.
Checking in on the status of the request.
Checking in on the request given the flux of the times (COVID-19 context implied by date).
Checking in on the request status amidst the challenging times (likely COVID-19 context).
Checking in regarding the request amidst COVID flux.
Kate checks in on the request status and offers a call to discuss if helpful.
Follow-up email checking on the status of the request during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Acknowledges receipt of the protocol. Presses for a response regarding their proposal to add a plaintiff-selected administrator.
Sending draft protocol from Feinberg and USVI filings.
Sending draft protocol from Feinberg and two documents filed by the Estate in USVI.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity