| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This document appears to be page 268 of a larger report or academic paper, containing a bibliography or reference list. It details scientific citations ranging from 1950 to 1992, focusing on neuroscience, biochemistry (tryptophan hydroxylase), chaos theory, and probability theory (specifically works by mathematician A.N. Kolmogorov). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation file.
This document is page 252 of a larger file from the House Oversight Committee investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013752). It is a bibliography or reference list containing scientific citations related to neuroscience, chaos theory, and dynamical systems. The citations range in date from 1968 to 1998. While no direct communication with Jeffrey Epstein is visible on this specific page, the scientific subject matter aligns with Epstein's known funding interests in theoretical biology and neuroscience.
This document appears to be page 172 of a manuscript, essay, or book, likely written by the subject of the investigation (possibly Jeffrey Epstein or an associate), produced as part of a House Oversight Committee inquiry. The text is a philosophical and theological reflection discussing the nature of evil, the intersection of science and religion (specifically mathematics and evolutionary process), and references various religious and academic figures like Alfred North Whitehead and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. The author references personal interactions with 'English academicians' and friends at a 'mathematics institute.'
This document is page 139 of a larger manuscript (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013639). The text is an abstract essay drawing analogies between condensed matter physics (specifically 'crystalline' vs. 'glassy' states and the concept of 'frustration' in atomic arrangements) and extreme human sociological/religious behaviors (sexual predation by priests, terrorism, and fundamentalism). It appears to be part of a pseudo-scientific or philosophical work, possibly authored by or sent to Jeffrey Epstein given his interest in theoretical physics and the Edge Foundation circles.
This document is page 86 of a larger file (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013586), consisting of a bibliography or reference list. It cites various scientific texts ranging from 1951 to 1994, covering topics such as dynamical systems, social psychology, thermodynamics, information theory, and brain metabolism. The document likely pertains to scientific research proposals or background reading relevant to Jeffrey Epstein's scientific funding interests.
This document is page 83 of a scientific text, likely part of a larger collection reviewed by the House Oversight Committee regarding Jeffrey Epstein (indicated by the Bates stamp). The text discusses advanced mathematical concepts relating to dynamical systems, specifically 'generating partitions,' the 'Sinai-Ruelle-Bowen (SRB) measure,' and 'metric entropy.' It details the historical academic contributions of several prominent mathematicians, including Kolmogorov, Shannon, and Ornstein, and lists researchers from institutions like IBM, Stanford, Hebrew University, and Warwick University.
This document is a bibliography page titled 'Further Readings for Doesn't Everybody' (likely a reference to a manuscript or article). It lists ten books covering diverse topics including evangelicalism, mathematics, chaos theory, and psychology, published between 1945 and 2002. The document is marked with the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013541, indicating it is part of the House Oversight Committee's investigation files.
This document details efforts to depose Ghislaine Maxwell regarding her involvement with Jeffrey Epstein's affairs, her avoidance of deposition, and her attendance at Chelsea Clinton's wedding. It also outlines allegations concerning Donald Trump's connections to Epstein, including calls to Epstein's mansion, quotes praising Epstein, Trump's alleged flight on Epstein's plane, Epstein's ban from Mar-a-Lago, and allegations involving Jane Doe No. 102 being recruited by Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago.
An email thread from September 19, 2014, between Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler during the UN General Assembly week in New York. Epstein lists a significant number of high-profile individuals (Thiel, Summers, Clinton, etc.) he is seemingly in contact with or aware of, inviting Ruemmler to meet them. The conversation also touches on Ruemmler's schedule, her need to speak to 'the boss,' and a discussion regarding professional, emotional, and financial risk/reward.
An email from Robert Kuhn to Jeffrey Epstein dated August 19, 2018, requesting a meeting to introduce 'Closer To Truth' producer Peter Getzels. Kuhn discusses a project called 'Radical Breakthroughs,' describing it as a 'big opportunity for impact' and outlining production plans involving various universities and cities. The email also includes links to news articles about the US-China trade war.
An email thread between Robert Lawrence Kuhn and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias Jeffrey E. / jeevacation@gmail.com) regarding the production and funding of a project called 'Radical Breakthroughs' for the series 'Closer To Truth'. Kuhn submits budgets and preproduction materials involving Misha Gromov, seeking funding for Phase II. Epstein critiques the content as 'blahblah' regarding 'multi verse and sensience' [sic], and they schedule a meeting for January 5, 2018.
This document is an email thread from December 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein and an individual identified as 'anasalrasheed'. The correspondence coordinates a late-night visit to Epstein's home, includes a reference to a 'special cake from New York', and features a joke by the guest about not wanting to arrive early and find Donald Trump at the house. The thread concludes with the guest thanking Epstein for a 'nice gift' after the visit.
An email thread from February 2017 between Jeremy Rubin and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com). Rubin updates Epstein on Bitcoin-related political developments involving Trump appointees, his research at Stanford, and his current teaching engagement at Digital Garage in Tokyo. Epstein inquires about Rubin's location and confirms he is in New York, not Japan.
This document is a transcript page (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029074) capturing a Q&A session at a conference on poverty. A question is posed by Deborah Lubov of Zenit news agency to 'Bannon' (Steve Bannon) regarding the role of investment banks in combating poverty. Bannon responds by critiquing the greed of investment banks, specifically citing leverage ratio changes at Goldman Sachs under Hank Paulson, and laments the lack of criminal charges against bank executives following the 2008 financial crisis.
In this transcript, Steve Bannon discusses the mission and reach of Breitbart News, describing it as a platform for a global center-right populist movement opposing the "party of Davos" and centralized government. He compares this movement to the Tea Party and mentions Breitbart's coverage of European groups like UKIP and Front National. Additionally, Bannon comments on Vladimir Putin's intelligence and appeal to social conservatives regarding traditional values.
This document is a transcript page labeled with a House Oversight footer, featuring a Q&A session likely involving Steve Bannon. A Vatican correspondent asks Bannon about the role of investment banks in combating poverty. Bannon responds by criticizing the 2008 financial crisis bailouts, the leverage ratios of Goldman Sachs, and the regulatory changes made by Hank Paulson.
This document appears to be a page from a transcript of an interview with Steve Bannon, marked with a House Oversight Committee stamp. In the text, Bannon discusses the global expansion of Breitbart News, identifying it as a platform for a 'center-right populist movement' and the 'global tea party.' He contrasts the 'working men and women' with the 'Party of Davos' and global elites, referencing his past experience at Goldman Sachs. The document also includes a pull quote where Bannon comments on Vladimir Putin's intelligence and appeal to social conservatives.
This document is a transcript page, likely from a House Oversight production, featuring a Q&A between Steve Bannon and Deborah Lubov at a conference on poverty. Bannon critiques the 2008 financial crisis, attributing it to greed and regulatory changes led by Hank Paulson that allowed excessive leverage (35:1) at banks like Goldman Sachs. He laments the lack of criminal charges or financial penalties for bank executives following the crisis.
This document is a transcript page from a House Oversight collection (Bates stamp 029027) featuring an interview with Steve Bannon. Bannon discusses the growth of his media organization (likely Breitbart) relative to Fox News, the rise of a 'global tea party movement,' and populist sentiments against the 'party of Davos' and centralized governments. He specifically references reporting on UKIP and Front National, his time at Goldman Sachs, and offers a warning about Vladimir Putin's intelligence and appeal to social conservatives.
In this July 2016 email thread, Jeffrey Epstein and Deepak Chopra coordinate communication. Epstein informs Chopra he is in Palm Beach, suggests a Skype call, and explicitly invites Chopra to visit his private island. They also discuss a recent academic session at Harvard regarding perception and human-robot interaction, while Chopra mentions having galleys of his new book 'Super Genes'.
This text analyzes the actions of Russian Ambassador Kislyak and President Putin surrounding the 2016 U.S. election, arguing that their strategy was not solely to help Trump but to sow distrust in American democratic institutions. The author suggests Kislyak intentionally exposed communications with Kushner and Flynn to U.S. intelligence to create internal conflict, aligning with Putin's broader goal of undermining American hegemony and legitimacy.
This document appears to be a personal narrative or draft written by Jeffrey Epstein reflecting on his legal representation and crimes. He criticizes his lawyers, Lewis and Tein, accusing them of celebrating his ongoing legal troubles for the sake of fees, and explicitly admits to being a 'john' who paid for sex while attempting to minimize the severity of his crimes by comparing them to jaywalking and claiming state attorneys found 'no real victims.' He discusses the age of consent in New York versus Florida and argues that the women involved were knowing participants.
This document is a first-person statement, likely by Jeffrey Epstein, criticizing the handling of his plea deal and subsequent civil suits. He alleges that the government violated the spirit of his agreement, that an opposing attorney engaged in nepotism and excessive billing ($800,000), and that the accusers were unreliable witnesses who worked in the sex trade. He defends himself by claiming he was merely a 'consumer of prostitution' rather than a trafficker and explains he took the plea deal to avoid a mandatory 10-year sentence and a biased trial.
This document is an email thread from December 2, 2014, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias Jeffrey E./jeevacation@gmail.com) and Lisa New. Lisa New is soliciting $500,000 to fund a second HGSE (Harvard Graduate School of Education) course titled 'Poetry in America for Teachers II,' mentioning participation from notable figures like Richard Dawkins and Walter Isaacson. Epstein replies briefly that he was called into a conference and will continue the discussion later in the week.
This email chain from March 11, 2018, documents communication between Jeffrey Epstein, Steve Bannon, and Sean Bannon. The conversation revolves around a news article about Steve Bannon, with Epstein commenting 'luv it' and suggesting they 'lay out a strategy plan.' Crucially, Epstein mentions having just spoken to 'one of the country leaders that we discussed' and confirms he hosted the Bannons earlier that day ('Thanks for having us today').
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity