| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This document is an excerpt from a transcript or deposition, likely involving Ghislaine Maxwell being questioned by Todd Blanche. The discussion revolves around the presence of cameras in a house associated with Mr. Epstein, the potential for compromising photographs, and whether Ghislaine Maxwell had knowledge of any blackmail or extortion attempts related to Mr. Epstein. Ghislaine Maxwell denies observing such photographs or hearing about blackmail, but confirms her association with Mr. Epstein in civil cases and involvement in a 'New York case' discovery.
This document is a page from a transcript of a dialogue between Todd Blanche and Ghislaine Maxwell, likely part of a deposition or interview. The speakers are discussing various properties and assets, including a brownstone in New York, an island in the Caribbean, a residence in Palm Beach, a ranch in New Mexico, a location in Paris, and a plane. The discussion seems to be confirming ownership or association with these locations and an aircraft.
This document is a page from a legal transcript, likely an interview or deposition, featuring a dialogue between Todd Blanche and Ghislaine Maxwell. The conversation revolves around an unnamed individual who allegedly provided financial help, with Maxwell's husband being a controller in New York. Todd Blanche presses Maxwell on her disbelief regarding allegations of blackmail and fraud against this individual, which Maxwell denies believing.
This document is a transcript of a legal proceeding where Todd Blanche is questioning Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell discusses her living location in New York between 2009-2019 and her communications with an unnamed 'him' (likely Jeffrey Epstein), specifically having phone calls and sending emails to him for details during times of legal or press attention. She also mentions learning about 'his' federal case in New York through the press.
This document is an excerpt from a transcript or deposition where Ghislaine Maxwell is being questioned about her relationships and activities, particularly around the time of 9/11. She discusses a past relationship with an unnamed individual (likely Jeffrey Epstein), his other girlfriends, and his mother's hospitalization. A key point is the question and affirmative answer regarding whether she was still being paid by 'him'.
This document is an excerpt from a transcript or deposition featuring Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche. Maxwell discusses finding a house for rent in New York for an unnamed individual, which she describes as a former Iranian embassy or belonging to the Iranians/Iraqis, and later identifies as a State Department house with a monthly rent of $12,000. She recounts an exchange where she questioned the renter's ability to afford it, to which he responded it was 'ridiculous'.
This document is a transcript of testimony or a deposition involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Todd Blanche, and David Markus. Ghislaine Maxwell recounts how her connection with Epstein began, stating she was looking for real estate for her father when Epstein asked for her help finding a new apartment. She also describes returning to New York in 1991 after her father's death in England, and how Epstein encouraged her to stay in America and continue helping him amidst family and business turmoil.
This document details negotiations and communications surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) addendum in late 2007. It highlights disagreements and strategies among prosecutors (Acosta, Sloman, Villafaña, Lourie) and defense counsel (Lefkowitz), including the postponement of Epstein's plea and concerns about Epstein's alleged attempts to discredit victims and influence the legal process. The text also includes Acosta's perspective on not dictating to the state attorney's office.
This document is an API Hit Data record indicating a query for a flight related to Jeffrey Epstein. It details an inbound flight from Paris, Charles de Gaulle (CDG) to John F Kennedy International (JFK) on Air France flight number 2, with a query date of January 30, 2003.
This document is an API/HIT data record detailing a flight taken by Jeffrey E. Epstein on October 15, 2013. He was a passenger on Air France flight number 6, traveling from Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport (CDG) to New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK).
This document is a conclusion from an OPR report detailing the investigation into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by federal prosecutors. It outlines the Miami Herald's 2018 report, the subsequent OPR investigation into the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving R. Alexander Acosta, and the findings regarding victim rights violations. The report identifies five former USAO attorneys, including Acosta, as subjects of the investigation concerning their involvement in the NPA and victim notification.
This document details an OPR investigation finding no evidence that Jeffrey Epstein was a cooperating witness or 'intelligence asset' in federal matters. It concludes that Acosta exercised poor judgment in resolving a federal investigation against Epstein through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), which allowed Epstein to manipulate his sentence conditions and lacked sufficient federal oversight. The document also references media reports and internal discussions concerning rumors of Epstein's cooperation.
This is a heavily redacted IO95 Inspection Comments form from April 28, 2014. The document notes the subject's city of birth as New York, country of birth as USA, and indicates 'NO CHANGE OF ADDRESS'. The extensive redactions, citing exemptions like (b)(7)(E), obscure the identity of the individual and other specific details of the inspection.
This document is a CBP IO95 Inspection Result printout dated April 28, 2014, detailing an entry by Jeffrey Epstein on October 20, 2012. The record indicates Epstein arrived at Newark International Airport (A103 NEWARK) on flight/vessel 'EC 1 OPEN SKIES'. While his nationality is curiously listed as 'RS RUSSIA (HISTORICAL)', his disposition is confirmed as 'USC U.S. CITIZEN'. The document notes he was referred by a CBP officer at 13:31 and processed by a secondary officer at 13:55, with comments noting 'NO CHANGE OF ADDRESS'.
This is an IO25 Inspection Remarks document from the Department of Justice, dated April 28, 2014. The document records an inspection of an individual whose city of birth is New York and country of birth is the USA. Most other details, including comments, inspection results, and identifying information, are redacted under FOIA exemptions related to law enforcement records and personal privacy.
This IO25 Inspection Remarks report, dated April 28, 2014, documents the inspection and subsequent release of an unnamed individual. The subject is noted as being a registered resident of the U.S. Virgin Islands, Florida, and New York. The release was approved by the on-duty Supervisory Customs and Border Protection Officer (SCBPO) and concluded without further incident.
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, presenting an argument for the admissibility of photographs taken long after the events in question. It cites legal precedents, including United States v. Causey (2014) and United States v. Smith (2020), to support the claim that such photos are relevant if they depict enduring scenes like buildings. The document also notes the defense's counter-argument regarding relevance and prejudice.
This document is a court transcript from a legal case, filed on August 10, 2022, concerning Jeffrey Epstein. The judge is discussing the admissibility of photographs taken in 2019 of Epstein's New York apartment, which the government wants to use to corroborate the 1994 testimony of a witness named "Jane". The judge outlines the legal reasoning for determining the relevance and potential prejudice of such evidence, particularly the difference between photos of fixed structures versus movable objects.
Page 65 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of Mr. Alessi by Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on confirming details of a 'major renovation' at a Palm Beach property, including work on bathrooms, floors, guestroom molding, and masonry. The dialogue also establishes that architects from New York would fly down to Palm Beach to supervise the work.
This document is a transcript of a court testimony from August 10, 2022, featuring a witness named Alessi. Alessi testifies about books at a Palm Beach location associated with a Mr. Epstein, stating they were not tasked with preserving them. The witness confirms that it was standard practice to destroy old books and throw them in the garbage whenever a new version was created.
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Alessi. The questioner attempts to determine the origin of a piece of evidence, "Exhibit 52," and its accompanying Post-It notes, suggesting locations such as New York, Palm Beach, and California. Alessi consistently denies having any personal knowledge about where the exhibit or the notes were created or came from.
This document is a transcript of testimony from a witness named Alessi, filed on August 10, 2022. Alessi describes the process of scheduling massages for Mr. Epstein, stating that requests came from Ms. Maxwell, Mr. Epstein himself, or office staff in New York. The witness maintained a Rolodex of massage therapists and would call them to arrange appointments, later confirming with Maxwell or Epstein. The testimony also reveals that a Ms. Kellen also scheduled massages and that Mr. Epstein was receiving up to three massages a day at one point.
This document is a page from the transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Alessi (likely Juan Alessi) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The witness testifies about the logistics of Epstein's travel plans, identifying secretaries Fiona and Kimberly as points of contact. Crucially, Alessi identifies Virginia Roberts as an underage female he saw at Epstein's house and states he first saw her at Mar-a-Lago one afternoon while Ms. Maxwell was there to check the spa.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity