| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This legal document, filed on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, argues that she was not a flight risk prior to her arrest. It asserts that she intentionally moved to New Hampshire to be within driving distance of New York prosecutors and that her legal counsel was in regular, documented contact with the government for months. The filing aims to counter the government's portrayal of her as a fugitive by demonstrating her intent to remain in the U.S. and face any potential charges.
This document is a partial court transcript from April 1, 2021, where Ms. Moe, representing the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, addresses the court. She asserts that the government's presentation of the defendant's conduct, detailed in an indictment returned by a grand jury, consists of undisputed facts and evidence, not 'spin.' Ms. Moe highlights the chilling conduct described in the indictment, involving an adult woman cultivating underage girls for sexual abuse and exploitation by an adult man, and also mentions the defendant's undisputed actions of living in hiding and financial matters.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 21-770) dated April 1, 2021, concerning a bail application. The defense attorney argues against a deep investigation into the detained client's finances, specifically addressing a 2016 real estate transaction of $15 million (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's townhouse sale). The defense disputes the government's claim that the client retains $14 million in liquid assets, citing liabilities and litigation expenses, while referencing legal precedents (Khashoggi, Dreier) regarding bail amounts.
This document is a court transcript from April 1, 2021, detailing a discussion about discovery materials. A representative, Ms. Moe, informs the judge that physical files from a prior F.B.I. investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Florida have been transferred to the New York F.B.I. office for scanning and review. The judge then inquires about the process for identifying and disclosing any other relevant information beyond these specific files.
This legal document argues for Ms. Maxwell's bail, asserting that the government's position on her danger to the community is inconsistent with its stance on Epstein. It highlights the COVID-19 pandemic as a health risk and an impediment to her defense, and contends that Ms. Maxwell is not a flight risk due to her strong community ties, U.S. citizenship, lack of criminal record, and continued presence in the U.S. since Epstein's arrest.
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page (page iii) from a legal filing (Document 18) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on July 10, 2020. It lists various legal precedents cited in the brief, including 'United States v. Epstein' (2019) and several other cases regarding bail and detention, referencing 18 U.S.C. § 3142.
This document provides the background for a federal indictment returned on June 29, 2020, charging the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) with conspiracy, enticing minors for illegal sex acts, and perjury. It describes a scheme operating between 1994 and 1997 in New York, Florida, and New Mexico, where the defendant allegedly groomed underage girls to be sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein. The text details specific grooming tactics used, such as befriending victims and taking them on shopping trips to normalize the abuse.
This legal document argues against the government's assertion that Ghislaine Maxwell was a flight risk. It contends she was not hiding before her arrest, but was living openly in her New Hampshire home and communicating with the government via her lawyers. The document attributes her low profile to intense media harassment, citing a £10,000 bounty offered by The Sun tabloid, and includes a quote from an FBI official confirming the agency knew her whereabouts.
This document is a notice from the court regarding Case 21-770, dated April 1, 2021. It informs counsel Christian R. Everdell that a filing was defective because a motion to be relieved is required for substitution of counsel. The document sets a deadline of April 5, 2021, to cure the defect to avoid the document being stricken or the appeal dismissed.
This legal document details the extensive financial assets of a defendant, including hundreds of millions in equities and numerous high-value properties, to argue against a bail package. The government contends that these assets, along with recently discovered cash and diamonds, provide the defendant with the means to flee the jurisdiction. The document also references the defendant's past alleged criminal conduct, including working with associates to exploit minors.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the defendant, Mr. Epstein, is an extraordinary flight risk. It cites his vast wealth, including an $8.6 million Paris residence, ownership of private jets used for frequent international travel, and limited family ties to the U.S. The document also reveals that a recent search of his New York City home uncovered an expired Austrian passport with his photo but another name, listing a residence in Saudi Arabia, further heightening concerns about his potential to flee.
This document is page 22 of a court filing (Document 32) from July 18, 2019, in the case United States v. Epstein. The text details the Court's finding that Epstein is a 'flight risk' based on a Pretrial Services Report citing his extensive foreign travel, international ties, unexplained assets, and criminal history. It also outlines the seriousness of the charges against him, specifically the alleged sexual abuse of minors in New York and Palm Beach involving the facilitation by employees and associates.
This legal document details Jeffrey Epstein's alleged failure to comply with New York sex offender registration requirements, citing a New York Post report. It also references allegations from an attorney, Brad Edwards, that Epstein continued to engage in sexual misconduct with female visitors while on work release from a Florida jail. The document notes that the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office disputes these claims about his conduct during work release.
This document is page 12 of a government legal filing from July 18, 2019, arguing for the pretrial detention of Jeffrey Epstein. It details evidence found during a July 6-7, 2019 FBI search of Epstein's NYC mansion, specifically a 'vast trove' of CD's containing thousands of nude photographs of underage girls and women, which the government labels as 'photographic trophies.' The prosecution argues this evidence, along with his 2008 conviction, demonstrates that Epstein poses an ongoing danger to the community.
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against the pretrial release of Mr. Epstein, asserting he is a danger to the community. It cites testimony from a bail hearing on July 15, 2019, where a victim, Annie Farmer, stated she met Epstein as a minor, was flown to New Mexico, and that he was 'inappropriate' with her. The document uses this testimony to support the government's position that Epstein's release would result in the harassment and abuse of victims.
This legal document, filed on August 4, 2025, is a letter from the U.S. Government to Judges Berman and Engelmayer regarding motions to unseal grand jury transcripts. The government discusses legal precedents for maintaining grand jury secrecy and updates the court on its progress in notifying victims, particularly those related to the 'Maxwell and Epstein matters'. The government commits to continuing its efforts to contact all relevant victims and to protect the interests of all third parties involved.
This document is a page from a legal transcript, likely a victim impact statement, in which the speaker recounts their experience with a powerful and influential man. The speaker describes being manipulated through displays of power, such as phone calls to celebrities and claims of friendship with heads of state. The man specifically promised the speaker a letter of recommendation to Harvard, preying on their vulnerabilities and leading the speaker to conclude, 'I was the perfect victim'.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019, in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein. Attorney Teri Gibbs appears on behalf of attorney Lisa Bloom to read victim impact statements into the record, including a powerful statement from "Jane Doe 6" addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman. The statement describes the lasting harm caused by Epstein and asserts the author's identity as a survivor, not a victim.
This document is a court transcript from September 3, 2019, containing a victim impact statement by Sarah Ransome. Ransome identifies herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's sex trafficking ring, thanks the prosecutors of the Southern District of New York, and urges them to continue their investigation, stating that Epstein did not act alone.
This document is a transcript of a court statement given by Virginia Roberts Giuffre on September 3, 2019. Giuffre identifies herself as a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, recounting how Maxwell recruited her at Mar-a-Lago just before her 17th birthday. She commends the prosecutors of the Southern District of New York for their investigation and expresses hope for justice and accountability for all victims.
This court transcript from a hearing on September 3, 2019, details an argument by Ms. Comey against the court conducting its own investigation into the death of Mr. Epstein. She informs the court that an active and separate investigation is already being conducted by a grand jury, Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Southern District of New York, and the FBI. Ms. Comey asserts that such an investigation is the proper function of these entities, not the court, especially concerning uncharged matters.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) filed on September 3, 2019. Epstein's defense counsel argues to the judge that Epstein's suicide on August 10 was 'implausible' given the pending legal motions scheduled for August 12, including a bail appeal and document production requests. The counsel also asserts that the initial autopsy findings on August 11 were inconclusive and reiterates the defense stance that the New York prosecution violated the Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
This document is page 2 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB (United States v. Jeffrey Epstein), filed on August 6, 2019. The text details a scheduling conference where prosecutor Ms. Moe proposes an October 31 deadline for discovery. She notes a specific exception regarding materials seized from the defendant's New York residence, which the F.B.I. is currently reviewing, necessitating a privilege-review protocol with defense counsel.
This document is a court transcript from July 24, 2019, featuring the testimony of Annie Farmer in a case against Jeffrey Epstein. Farmer states she met Epstein in New York at age 16 and argues against granting him bail, asserting that his wealth, privilege, and the discovery of photographs of young women would make it more difficult, not easier, for other victims to come forward.
This document is page 43 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. Defense attorney Mr. Weinberg argues that his client has meticulously complied with sex offender registration requirements for nine years, informing authorities in the Virgin Islands of travel to Paris, Florida, and New York. The Judge (The Court) questions Weinberg about the specific criteria for reporting presence (the 10-day rule) and questions the registration requirements in New Mexico.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity