| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This is a court filing from September 24, 2020, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 20-3061). Ghislaine Maxwell, through her attorneys Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., submits an unopposed motion to file three specific documents under seal: her unredacted opening brief, Appendix Volume 2, and an unredacted response to a government opposition motion. The document originates from an appeal of the case in the Southern District of New York.
This legal document, dated August 24, 2020, is page 3 of a filing to Judge Alison J. Nathan on behalf of Ms. Maxwell. It argues against the U.S. Government's position, refuting the claim that materials Ms. Maxwell seeks to file under seal are 'Confidential' or would compromise a 'secret' investigation. The filing cites legal precedent and states that the subpoena recipient is already aware of the information in question.
This legal document, dated August 24, 2020, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan. It argues for the continued sealing of certain court documents, with redactions, to protect Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial from pretrial publicity. The filing references the government's own public statements about its ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's associates as evidence of the high-profile nature of the case.
A heavily redacted legal filing from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 17, 2020. The document discusses procedural history, including government applications in 2019, Maxwell's arrest in July 2020, and allegations in the superseding indictment regarding perjury and assisting Jeffrey Epstein. A footnote details the timeline of discovery materials received by the defense in early August 2020.
This page from a legal filing dated July 21, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues that government officials (Ms. Strauss and FBI Agent William Sweeney) and private attorneys (David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, and Bradley Edwards) made prohibited, prejudicial public statements regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The document cites specific quotes comparing Maxwell to a 'snake' and 'villain,' as well as speculation about her potential cooperation with prosecutors to implicate other 'wealthy and influential people.' The filing asserts these comments violate Local Rule 23.1.
This document is a page from a legal indictment against an individual named MAXWELL, filed on July 8, 2020. It outlines specific allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation of three unnamed minors (Victim-1, Victim-2, and Victim-3) between 1994 and 1997. The alleged crimes, which involved a co-conspirator named Epstein, took place in various locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London, England.
This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) details allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell regarding two minor victims. It describes how Maxwell participated in sexualized massages with Minor Victim-1 and facilitated her travel to New York and Florida for abuse. Additionally, it outlines incidents in 1996 in New Mexico where Maxwell groomed Minor Victim-2 (who was under 18) through activities like shopping and movies.
This legal document, dated August 21, 2020, is a submission from the Acting United States Attorney and Assistant United States Attorneys to Honorable Alison J. Nathan. It argues against the defendant's application to use criminal discovery materials in civil cases, asserting that the application lacks legal justification, attempts to circumvent a protective order, and is irrelevant to the civil litigation. The document suggests the defendant's intent is to falsely accuse the Government and another party.
This document is a UPS Next Day Air shipping label for a package sent by Renee McReynolds of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P. in Denver, CO. The package, filed on September 4, 2020, was addressed to the Clerk of Court at the US District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) in New York City. The shipment's reference line indicates it pertains to the legal case 'Maxwell 20 cr. 330 (AJN)'.
This document is a page from a legal filing dated July 2, 2020, outlining overt acts in a criminal conspiracy case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that Maxwell, along with Jeffrey Epstein, conspired to transport minors for illegal sexual activity. Specific allegations include Maxwell and Epstein participating in group sexual encounters with "Minor Victim-1" in New York and Florida between 1994 and 1997, and enticing the same victim to travel from Florida to New York for sexual abuse around 1996.
This page from a legal indictment, filed on July 2, 2020, details several allegations against an individual named MAXWELL. The charges state that between 1994 and 1997, MAXWELL, in concert with Epstein, engaged in sexual abuse of three minors (Minor Victim-1, -2, and -3) across multiple locations including New York, Florida, New Mexico, and London. The specific allegations include participating in group sexual encounters, enticing a minor to travel for sexual abuse, and facilitating sexual abuse by encouraging a minor to provide massages to Epstein.
This legal document, filed on July 2, 2020, alleges that MAXWELL actively participated in the sexual abuse of minors with Epstein. It details MAXWELL's involvement with 'Minor Victim-1' in 'group sexualized massages' at Epstein's residences in New York and Florida. The document also describes how MAXWELL allegedly groomed 'Minor Victim-2' in New Mexico around 1996, when the victim was under 18, for the purpose of being abused by Epstein.
This document is the final signature page (Page 19 of 19) of an indictment filed on July 2, 2020, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the charges under 18 U.S.C. codes (including conspiracy, perjury, and sex trafficking statutes) and bears the name of Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and the signature of the Grand Jury Foreperson.
This document appears to be page 14 of a criminal indictment filed on July 2, 2020 (Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ). It outlines conspiracy charges against Ghislaine Maxwell for the transportation of minors (Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2423(a)). The 'Overt Acts' section details specific incidents between 1994 and 1997 where Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein allegedly abused 'Minor Victim-1' in New York and Florida.
This document is page 12 of a legal indictment filed on July 2, 2020, detailing specific allegations against an individual named MAXWELL. The charges describe her involvement with Epstein in the sexual abuse and exploitation of three minors between 1994 and 1997. The alleged criminal acts, including group sexual encounters and enticement to travel for sex acts, occurred in New York, Florida, and London, England.
This legal document, part of a court filing, alleges that an individual named MAXWELL participated in the sexual abuse of minors with Epstein. It details MAXWELL's alleged involvement with two victims: encouraging 'Minor Victim-1' to travel to Epstein's residences in New York and Florida for sexual encounters, and grooming 'Minor Victim-2' in New Mexico around 1996 for abuse by Epstein.
This document is page 5 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Menninger argues regarding the admissibility of hearsay evidence involving sisters Annie and Maria Farmer, specifically noting that Maria Farmer alleged nude photographs were stolen from her, but a search of Mr. Epstein's home yielded no such photos. The defense notes that Annie Farmer is a practicing therapist who has made public statements on the topic.
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding the residences of an unnamed male individual in New York City. The testimony establishes that the individual lived on 69th Street around 1991, when he hired the witness, and later moved to a townhouse at 9 East 71st Street in 1996.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on the living arrangements of Mr. Epstein in the early 1990s, establishing that he lived in a trailer on a newly purchased property while the main house was under construction. The witness confirms they stayed in a separate bunkhouse at a location called "Ranch Central" and the questioning begins to explore where Ghislaine lived in New York during the same period.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers recounts their personal history, stating they met Jeffrey Epstein while living near Columbus, Ohio, then lived in Manhattan for a year before moving to West Palm Beach in 1994. The testimony also establishes that Epstein maintained residences in both New York and Palm Beach.
This document is a legal rebuttal arguing for the credibility of a witness named Jane, asserting that her memory of meeting Maxwell and Epstein and the onset of abuse at age 14 is accurate. It counters defense attempts to discredit her timeline by referencing Interlochen and flight records from 1994 and 1996, which place Jane, Maxwell, Epstein, and the defendant together at key times and locations, including flights to New York. The speaker emphasizes that Jane's memory of the abuse is more significant than minor discrepancies in dating events by public figures' birthdays.
This document is a transcript of a defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorney argues for Maxwell's acquittal by claiming a lack of concrete evidence, such as phone records, and emphasizing that mere presence at a location or knowledge of a plan without participation is insufficient for a conviction. She reminds the jury that suspicion is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt and that Maxwell is presumed innocent.
This document is a summation by Ms. Menninger in a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Menninger argues for reasonable doubt regarding Carolyn's involvement in Count Six, suggesting Carolyn added Ghislaine Maxwell to her story after financial difficulties. The summation also addresses the government's conspiracy theory involving Epstein and Maxwell arranging for underage females to travel to New York for sex acts, clarifying that Carolyn did not travel to New York and Annie Farmer's travel was independent of Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger, likely a lawyer. The speaker is challenging the credibility of a witness's testimony by highlighting inconsistencies in her statements to the government over time (2006 vs. 2020 vs. current testimony) regarding a trip to New Mexico and interactions with Ghislaine and Epstein, including the purpose of the trip and the nature of massages she received.
This document is a page from the defense summation (closing argument) by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The attorney summarizes the testimony of a witness who visited New York with her sister, detailing innocent activities (Blue Man Group, The Met) and two meetings with Epstein: one in his office regarding college applications and one at a movie theater where he held her hand. The defense emphasizes that the witness testified Maxwell was not present for any of these events and argues there is no evidence of Maxwell's involvement in targeting this witness.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity