| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This document is page 13 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated December 14, 2020, analyzing the potential human rights objections Ghislaine Maxwell might raise against extradition to the US. The text specifically argues that Maxwell is unlikely to succeed in claiming a violation of Article 3 of the ECHR regarding prison conditions, citing numerous legal precedents where such claims were rejected. Footnotes reference specific cases and US detention facilities (MDC and MCC) in New York.
This legal document, part of a financial condition report, estimates Ghislaine Maxwell and her spouse's net worth at approximately $22.5 million as of October 31, 2020, noting this figure includes $7.67 million in advance legal fees. The report, covering 2015-2020, found no significant cash transfers outside of their control but contrasts this with a prior period (2007-2011) where over $20 million was transferred between Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The analysis was limited by the unavailability of complete bank statements.
A character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The redacted author describes knowing Maxwell since age 6, being entrusted to her care at ages 12, 15, and 19, and interning for her in New York in 2009. The letter attempts to refute negative media portrayals by highlighting Maxwell's support, integrity, and work with an 'Oceans charity'.
A character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The author, whose name is redacted, describes a 30-year friendship with Maxwell, noting her academic success at Oxford and honesty. The author details two specific trips to the US in February 2013 and December 2018 where they and their son stayed with Maxwell in New York and another redacted location, asserting they never witnessed inappropriate behavior.
This document is a letter of support dated December 1, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The anonymous author, a close friend of Maxwell since at least 1991, attests to Maxwell's character, mentions staying with her in New York after her father's death, and defends the operations of the TerraMar charity. The author asserts they have never witnessed unlawful or inappropriate behavior by Maxwell.
This document is a character reference submitted as part of a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 14, 2020. The redacted author expresses unwavering belief in Ghislaine's innocence and offers their $1.5 million property, their sole retirement asset, as collateral for her bail. The author describes Ghislaine as a compassionate, caring, and non-violent person with whom they and their children have always felt completely safe.
This document is a redacted character reference letter filed on December 14, 2020, as part of the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The anonymous author outlines Maxwell's history, including her Oxford graduation, her move to New York in the early 1990s, and her philanthropic work with The Terramar Project and the UN. The letter strongly defends her character against media portrayals and asserts her innocence regarding the criminal charges.
This document is a redacted letter of support filed on December 14, 2020, as part of a bail application for Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The unnamed author attests to Maxwell's character, claims she was 'laying low' due to vigilantes rather than hiding from authorities, and offers to co-sign a $1.5 million bond. Furthermore, the author commits to living with Maxwell 24/7 in a New York residence to ensure she does not flee if released.
This document is the final page of a declaration filed on December 14, 2020, in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The redacted author explains their initial reluctance to co-sign due to media aggression but expresses a firm belief in Maxwell's innocence regarding Epstein's crimes and her intent to stand trial in the U.S. The author concludes by offering prayers for Maxwell, justice, due process, and Epstein's victims.
This document is page 12 of a legal filing (dated Dec 14, 2020) arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The text argues that Maxwell has been subjected to unprecedented negative media coverage (more than Weinstein or El Chapo) but remains committed to fighting the charges in the US rather than fleeing. It emphasizes her strong ties to her spouse (whose name is redacted) and argues that continued detention under 'oppressive conditions' impairs her ability to prepare her defense.
This document is page 4 of a court filing (Document 97) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 14, 2020. It is a 'Table of Authorities' listing various legal precedents (United States v. Boustani, Bradshaw, Chen, etc.) cited elsewhere in the filing. The page is numbered 'iii' and bears the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00001976.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated December 10, 2020. In the transcript, a speaker identified as Ms. Moe explains to the judge ('your Honor') that files from a previous F.B.I. investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Florida have been physically shipped to the New York F.B.I. office. These files have been scanned and imaged to allow for a comprehensive review, and the court is inquiring about the process for disclosing any additional information that may be found.
This document is Page 5 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the Government is failing to meet discovery obligations, specifically regarding 28 boxes of material from Florida and files from Georgia, and that the proposed timeline impairs Maxwell's ability to prepare for the July 2021 trial. The text highlights concerns about witness statements, the age of the claims (26 years), and the difficulty of securing out-of-country testimony.
This document is a status update to Judge Alison Nathan regarding the Government's discovery process in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (implied by case number/context). It details the Prosecution Team's acquisition of investigative files from the Palm Beach State Attorney (PBSA), the FBI Florida Office (24 boxes), and the USAO-SDFL (28 boxes) related to the 2006-2010 Epstein investigations. It also notes that the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) has gathered internal emails regarding the handling of the prior Florida investigation, including those of a primary prosecutor referred to as 'Attorney-1'.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. In it, a witness describes the staff and companions who traveled with an unnamed male subject, identifying chefs Adam Perry and Didier, and a personal assistant named Annie Taylor. The witness emphasizes that Ms. Maxwell traveled with the subject most frequently, describing her role ambiguously as 'Girlfriend, whatever it was. Boss,'.
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, detailing an interview about an individual's travels with an unnamed male. The interviewee states she visited his private Caribbean island and London home as a vacationing guest, not as an employee. She also recounts attending a peculiar symposium in Santa Fe, New Mexico, about cleaning homes, which she describes as "stupid."
This memo, dated January 11, 2006, is from attorney Michael Salnick to Daliah Weiss regarding an investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Salnick confirms the rescheduling of a meeting with his client, Janusz Banasiak, for January 17, 2006, at Weiss's office. He also references a prior conversation where Weiss indicated she would issue a subpoena to Banasiak and requests a faxed copy of it before their meeting.
This legal document, a letter from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek dated June 5, 2006, analyzes the significant risk that a client's potential plea to aggravated assault in Florida could trigger mandatory sex offender registration. The analysis covers the specific laws and registration requirements in the client's primary residence of the Virgin Islands, secondary domicile of New York, and other states like Oklahoma and Montana, highlighting how different jurisdictions interpret and apply their statutes to out-of-state convictions.
This document is page 3 of a legal letter dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Ms. Lanna Belohlavek. It provides a legal analysis of sex offender registration laws in New York, California, Colorado, and Florida, particularly concerning convictions from other jurisdictions. The letter highlights that courts in states like New York and California may examine the underlying conduct of an offense, rather than just its formal elements, to determine if registration is required.
This legal memo, dated June 5, 2006, from the Law Offices of Gerald B. Lefcourt to Lanna Belohlavek, analyzes the severe risk that a client's potential plea to aggravated assault in Florida would trigger mandatory sex offender registration. The analysis covers the client's primary residence in the Virgin Islands and secondary domicile in New York, both of which have broad registration statutes, and also notes similar requirements in other states like Oklahoma and Montana, highlighting the far-reaching consequences of the plea.
This document is page 2 of a legal complaint filed against Jeffrey Epstein, establishing jurisdiction, venue, and outlining factual allegations regarding his wealth, residences, and alleged sexual abuse of minors. It specifically details a scheme to exploit economically disadvantaged girls, introduces a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe who was victimized at age 14 in 2005, and names Haley Robson as an integral player in the scheme.
This document is page 66 of a contact book (likely Jeffrey Epstein's 'Little Black Book'), identified by the DOJ Bates number DOJ-OGR-00022351. It contains an alphabetical list of contacts ranging from 'Beverly Wilshire' to 'Four Seasons Restaurant'. The list primarily consists of high-end hotels, restaurants, and services (mostly in New York), along with specific individuals such as chef Henry Meer and Gibby Cohen. All specific contact details (phone numbers/addresses) have been redacted.
This document is a page (labeled 24) from a redacted address book or contact list, released by the DOJ. It lists individuals alphabetically, predominantly with surnames starting with 'F', including members of the Ferragamo family, actor Ralph Fiennes, musician Brian Ferry, and Princess Firyal. All contact details (phone numbers/addresses) beneath the names have been redacted with black boxes. Faint index tabs at the top suggest sections for 'New York' and 'Palm Beach'.
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Document 35) from case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on April 24, 2020. It contains the Government's legal argument opposing discovery requests made by the defendant, Thomas (likely Michael Thomas, a guard involved in the Epstein jail case). The Government argues that Thomas's requests are irrelevant to the charges and are instead an attempt to 'garner sympathy' and argue 'jury nullification,' citing various legal precedents to support the exclusion of such evidence.
This document is a court transcript from December 16, 2019, detailing a hearing about the pretrial release conditions for defendants Thomas and Noel. The conditions discussed include restrictions on alcohol use and mandatory mental health evaluation, as directed by pretrial services. An attorney, Mr. Foy, objects to one of the conditions, stating it was not part of a prior agreement on the terms of release.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity