| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the author's mentorship under Arthur Goldberg, the history of UN Resolution 242 following the 1967 Six Day War, and offers a critique of the United Nations and Amnesty International regarding their treatment of Israel and human rights issues. It includes editor notes such as '[check year]' and '[get exact quote]'. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document appears to be a page (334) from a manuscript or book included in House Oversight files. The text is a sharp critique of 'The Guild' and Human Rights Watch (HRW), specifically regarding their reporting on the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah. The author (writing in the first person) accuses HRW and its director Kenneth Roth of bias against Israel and cites HRW founder Robert Bernstein's public criticism of the organization.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (page 318) recounting the author's high school years in the mid-1950s. The text details the author's leadership of the 'Inter-Yeshiva High School Council' and their successful postcard campaign lobbying the United Nations and Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge against a World Calendar Reform proposal that would have disrupted the Jewish Sabbath. While part of a House Oversight release (indicated by the footer), the specific content is historical and does not mention Epstein.
This document appears to be page 308 of a book manuscript or legal draft (marked with WC: 191694 and dated 4.2.12) produced to the House Oversight Committee. The text presents a harsh critique of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor for writing a letter supporting the notion of the U.S. as a 'Christian nation,' arguing she relied on bigoted historical opinions by Justice David Brewer. The author discusses constitutional history, citing Jefferson, Adams, and various Supreme Court cases to argue against the 'Christian nation' concept.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a memoir or legal narrative (likely by Alan Dershowitz, author of *Chutzpah*) describing his involvement in the 1992 conflict between Mia Farrow and Woody Allen. It quotes a harsh appellate court opinion regarding Allen's photography of Soon-Yi Previn and details the narrator's attempts to mediate a private resolution between Farrow and Allen to avoid public scandal. The document includes text of a letter sent to Allen warning him of the destruction of his career.
The author recounts interactions with Woody Allen and Mia Farrow, starting with discussions on film and politics, specifically the Rosenberg trial. The narrative shifts dramatically when Mia Farrow calls the author to allege that Woody Allen is abusing her children, leading the author and his wife to visit Farrow's home in Connecticut where they learn details of allegations involving Soon-Yi and Dylan.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (indicated by word count and date headers) written by an attorney, likely Alan Dershowitz, given the specific anecdotes and clients mentioned. The text analyzes the 'irrational' risky behavior of celebrity clients, specifically citing Leona Helmsley's tax evasion and Mike Tyson's rape conviction as examples where the risks outweighed the benefits. The author concludes with a psychological analysis of celebrity entitlement and a personal anecdote about reusing tea bags.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context and style) dated April 2, 2012. It discusses the complexities of 'he-said, she-said' rape allegations, using the 2011 Dominic Strauss-Kahn case as a primary example to illustrate false reporting and credibility issues. The author describes teaching a law class on the subject, inviting the victim's lawyer to speak, and debating the ethical standards for prosecutors when a victim's credibility is in doubt.
This document, page 246 of a House Oversight file, details a series of anecdotes from various US states and Great Britain regarding false rape accusations. The text provides specific examples of women recanting stories or being disproven by police evidence to support an argument about the prevalence of false reporting. It concludes with a quote from British journalist Angela Lambert criticizing the assumption that all accusers are truthful and a footnote discussing DNA exonerations of misidentified rapists.
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (possibly a memoir) dated April 2, 2012. The author recounts a personal tragedy from July 2011 where their sister-in-law, Marilyn (a retired lawyer), was killed by a postal truck in New York City. The text details the family's review of security footage showing the truck in a 'game of chicken' with a van, and their subsequent frustration with the prosecutor who only charged the driver with leaving the scene.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript drafted by Alan Dershowitz (indicated by the header date and style) discussing the legal appeal of Dr. Sybers. It details the legal strategy employed by Dershowitz and his brother, Nathan, focusing on challenging the scientific evidence and lab practices (including the FBI lab) used to convict Sybers. The text concludes with the mention of the court reversing the conviction.
A draft manuscript page dated April 2, 2012, narrated by Alan Dershowitz. It details his time as a law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg in 1963, focusing on their shared ambition to declare the death penalty unconstitutional via the Eighth Amendment. The text highlights Dershowitz's lifelong opposition to capital punishment and Goldberg's view of the Constitution as an evolving document.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the specific biographical details) discussing defamation law and the First Amendment. The author recounts a personal legal battle where he was charged with criminal defamation in Turin, Italy, for criticizing a judge's ruling on terrorism during a phone interview. The text also references the 1988 Supreme Court case involving Jerry Falwell and Hustler Magazine to illustrate legal standards regarding ridicule and public figures.
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or memoir (dated 2012) recounting the narrator's (likely Alan Dershowitz) early legal career in the late 1960s. It details his First Amendment defense of the Swedish film 'I Am Curious Yellow,' which was seized by US Customs and owned by Grove Press. The text outlines his legal strategy to challenge obscenity laws using the 'Stanley v. Georgia' precedent, comparing it to his work with Justice Goldberg.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of clerking for Goldberg and the name 'Alan') stamped by House Oversight. It details anecdotes about Supreme Court Justices Thurgood Marshall (alleging compromised behavior known to Hoover) and Arthur Goldberg (his resignation from the Court and failed gubernatorial run). It also highlights the narrator's close friendship with Stephen Breyer, describing efforts to help Breyer get appointed to the Supreme Court.
This document appears to be a page from a draft manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the biographical details) recounting his time as a law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg. It details his efforts to persuade Justice Brennan on death penalty opinions, his lifelong friendship with Brennan, and his continued work for Goldberg after his clerkship, including drafting UN Resolution 242 and smuggling cigarettes to Golda Meir in 1970. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript by Alan Dershowitz, included in House Oversight Committee records (Bates stamped). It details his early experiences at Yale Law School and his struggles with job hunting in New York in the late 1950s/early 1960s, specifically focusing on antisemitism and religious discrimination at major law firms like Sullivan and Cromwell and Paul, Weiss. It concludes with an anecdote about working for Milton Handler at Kaye, Scholer.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or autobiographical manuscript (likely by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of the known 'Yitz Greenberg' and '75 student' stories) produced for the House Oversight Committee. The text details the narrator's academic struggles in high school, a discouraging history teacher, and a pivotal moment where a camp counselor, Yitz Greenberg, encouraged him to become a lawyer. It also discusses the college application process to Brooklyn College and historical gender-based grade requirements for admission.
This document appears to be a page from a memoir or manuscript, likely written by Alan Dershowitz (based on biographical details such as attending Talmudical Academy and Brooklyn College). The text recounts the narrator's high school years in Brooklyn, including his reputation as a 'bad kid,' playing varsity basketball against Ralph Lauren (then Lipschitz), and interacting with Brooklyn Dodgers players near Ebbets Field. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Committee Bates number, suggesting it was part of a congressional inquiry.
This document appears to be page 7 of a manuscript draft (possibly for a memoir or book) dated April 2, 2012. The text is a philosophical exploration of 'ideology as biography,' discussing nature versus nurture, genetics, and the author's personal history as a descendant of Polish Jewish immigrants who moved to New York, narrowly avoiding the Holocaust. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
This document is a digital communication log from a House Oversight file (Bates stamp 027839) showing an exchange between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual between July 1 and July 3, 2019. The conversation includes brief logistical coordination ('Talk tomorrow', 'K') and cryptic, philosophical phrases ('What is the sound of one hand clapping'). The exchange concludes with Epstein proposing 'Sunday New York?', suggesting a planned meeting shortly before his arrest in July 2019.
This document contains a log of messages from May 25, 2019, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. They discuss Epstein's recent time spent with a 'general in charge of state security post WH' and coordinate a meeting in New York City for the 1st or 2nd of the month. The redacted individual indicates they will fly in specifically for these dates.
This document is a forensic log of digital messages exchanged on May 8, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias email 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation centers on political news regarding the Trump family, specifically sharing a CBS article about NY Senate bills on Trump's tax returns and discussing Donald Trump Jr. appearing before a Senate committee. The tone suggests a shared interest in potential legal or political troubles for the Trump administration, described as 'Drip drip drip' and 'Low hanging fruit'.
This document contains a log of five electronic messages sent on May 2, 2019, from the email address 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known alias for Jeffrey Epstein). The messages display a mix of taunting threats ('Tik tok tik tok', 'Now you want mercy... wrong guy'), travel logistics regarding a flight to New York, and a seemingly random link to a CNET article about a millipede preserved in amber. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight Committee investigation.
A forensic log of digital messages from March 30, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known alias of Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation centers on a 'science conference' in New York, with the redacted individual describing the topics as 'Smartest plants, string theory, quantum computing, life regeneration' and 'The Singularity,' referring to it as 'my movement.' The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity