DOJ-OGR-00019261.jpg
655 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
5
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
655 KB
Summary
This legal document, part of a court filing, details a procedural history where the Government obtained materials protected by civil orders after receiving permission from one court (Court-1) but not another (Court-2). The Defendant in a related criminal case learned of this through discovery. The current court is now permitting the Defendant to provide this information under seal to the relevant courts to resolve the conflict.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the Recipient | Recipient |
The party who turned over materials to the Government after a civil protective order was modified by Court-1.
|
| the Defendant | Defendant |
The party in a criminal matter who learned of sealed information through discovery and is being permitted by the cour...
|
| counsel | Legal Counsel |
Mentioned in a quote from the Government regarding the ability to make sealed applications to unseal materials.
|
| judicial decision makers | Judicial official |
Mentioned as part of the information the Defendant is permitted to provide to other courts under seal.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the Government | Government agency |
The party that sought modification of civil protective orders to obtain materials for a criminal grand jury.
|
| Court-1 | Court |
The court that permitted the modification of a civil protective order in April 2019.
|
| Court-2 | Court |
The court that did not permit the modification of a civil protective order.
|
| criminal grand jury | Legal body |
The entity for which compliance with subpoenas was sought by the Government.
|
| DOJ | Government agency |
Appears in the footer identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00019261', likely referring to the Department of Justice.
|
Timeline (5 events)
2019-02
The Government sought modification of civil protective orders ex parte and under seal to permit compliance with criminal grand jury subpoenas.
The Recipient turned over certain materials covered by the protective order to the Government.
The Defendant learned of the sealed information as a result of Rule 16 discovery in the criminal matter.
Relationships (3)
The document describes a criminal matter where the Government is the prosecuting entity and the Defendant is the accused, with disputes over information and protective orders.
The Government made an application to Court-1, which was granted.
The Government made an application to Court-2, which was denied.
Key Quotes (1)
"there is no impediment to counsel making sealed applications to Court-1 and Court-2, respectively, to unseal the relevant materials."Source
— the Government
(A statement from the Government, cited from Dkt. No. 46 at 3 n.5, suggesting a method for resolving the issue of the sealed materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00019261.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,893 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-Admin Document 52 Filed 09/02/20 Page 4 of 5
3. In February 2019, the Government, ex parte and under seal, sought modification of those civil protective orders so as to permit compliance with the criminal grand jury subpoenas;
4. In April 2019, one court (“Court-1”) permitted the modification and, subsequently, another court (“Court-2”) did not;
5. That as a result of the modification of the civil protective order by Court-1, the Recipient turned over to the Government certain materials that had been covered by the protective order; and
6. That the Defendant learned of this information (sealed by other courts) as a result of Rule 16 discovery in this criminal matter.
With the exception of identifying the relevant judicial decision makers and specific civil matters, all of the information listed above is available in the public record, including in the letter filed on the public docket by the Government on this issue. See Dkt. No. 46. Although this Court remains in the dark as to why this information will be relevant to those courts, so that those courts can make their own determination, to the extent it would otherwise be prohibited by the protective order in this matter, the Court hereby permits the defendant to provide to the relevant courts under seal the above information, including the information identifying the relevant judicial decision makers and civil matters.
In addition, the Government has indicated that “there is no impediment to counsel making sealed applications to Court-1 and Court-2, respectively, to unseal the relevant materials.” Dkt. No. 46 at 3 n.5. In her reply, the Defendant asserts that she is amenable to such a solution if the Court agrees with the Government that doing so would not contravene the protective order in this case. To the extent it would otherwise be prohibited by the protective
4
DOJ-OGR-00019261
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document