Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor

Person
Mentions
4
Relationships
2
Events
1
Documents
2
Also known as:
O'Connor
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
2 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person the author
Critic subject
1
1
View
organization ICA
Political affiliation alleged support
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
1987-01-01 N/A Justice O'Connor agreed to conduct a private briefing for $10,000 donors, then canceled after cri... Supreme Court View

DOJ-OGR-00009034.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing dated February 24, 2022, which analyzes legal precedent concerning juror bias, specifically from the case of McDonough. It presents quotes from concurring opinions by Justice Blackmun and Justice Brennan, arguing that an intentionally false answer from a juror is not a necessary condition for a new trial and that juror bias can be inferred from circumstances. The document highlights the judicial reasoning that a trial court retains the option to hold a post-trial hearing to determine bias, regardless of a juror's honesty during voir dire.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017396.jpg

This document appears to be page 309 of a manuscript or book draft (dated 4.2.12) found in House Oversight files. The text, written in the first person (likely by Alan Dershowitz given the context of the op-ed described), criticizes Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor for ethical lapses regarding partisan political activity. Specifically, it details her involvement with an Arizona Republican Party 'Christian Nation' resolution and a 1987 fundraising controversy.

Manuscript draft / book excerpt
2025-11-19
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
5
As Recipient
1
Total
6

Inquiry about holdings regarding US as a Christian nation

From: Justice Sandra Day O'C...
To: Unnamed recipient

O'Connor lists cases (Church of the Holy Trinity vs. United States; Zorach vs. Clauson; McGowan vs. Maryland) containing statements to the effect that the US is a Christian nation.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Regret regarding use of letter

From: Justice Sandra Day O'C...
To: public

Statement regretting that her letter had been 'used in a political debate'.

Statement
N/A
Communication Source

Support of resolution

From: Justice Sandra Day O'C...
To: Arizona Republican friend

Letter used in support of a proposed party resolution declaring the US a Christian Nation.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Tison v. Arizona Majority Opinion

From: Justice Sandra Day O'C...
To: Public Record

Discusses intent to kill, reckless indifference, and the death penalty.

Legal opinion
N/A
Communication Source

Tison v. Arizona Majority Opinion

From: Justice Sandra Day O'C...
To: Public Record

Discusses intent to kill, reckless indifference, and the death penalty.

Legal opinion
N/A
Communication Source

Christian Nation Resolution

From: Leader of Arizona Repu...
To: Justice Sandra Day O'C...

Asking for support for a resolution acknowledging the US as a Christian nation.

Letter
1988-01-01
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search