Debra C. Freeman

Person
Mentions
106
Relationships
0
Events
13
Documents
53

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2021-07-22 N/A Court Order signed by Judge Freeman lifting the stay and setting deadlines. New York View
2021-06-30 N/A Filing of letter informing Court of desire to lift stay New York, NY View
2020-08-14 N/A Filing of Status Report requesting continuation of stay New York, NY View
2020-06-22 N/A Order Staying Action signed by Judge Freeman New York, New York View
2020-06-15 N/A Order signed and filed by Judge Debra Freeman New York, New York View
2020-04-15 N/A Judge Debra Freeman orders the extension of deadlines as requested. New York, NY View
2020-04-15 N/A Request for extension of legal deadlines due to COVID-19 pandemic submitted and approved by Judge... New York, NY View
2020-04-15 N/A Order granted by Judge Freeman New York, NY View
2020-04-14 N/A Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman endorsed the memorandum, granting the requested extension. New York, NY View
2020-04-14 N/A Court Order Granting Extension New York, NY View
2020-03-06 N/A Court Order filed relieving Andrew S. Buzin as counsel for Jane Doe 17 New York, New York View
2020-03-06 N/A Filing of letter motion to withdraw as counsel. New York View
2020-03-06 N/A Court Order issued relieving Andrew S. Buzin and Buzin Law, P.C. as counsel for Jane Doe 17. New York, New York View

018.pdf

This document is a legal status report filed on December 1, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz regarding the civil case of Jane Doe v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The letter informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that the Plaintiff intends to submit a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and requests that the current litigation remain stayed to preserve resources pending the outcome of that administrative claim.

Legal correspondence / status report
2025-12-26

017.pdf

A legal status report filed on November 2, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Indyke and Kahn). The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff (Jane Doe) intends to submit a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. Consequently, both parties request that the lawsuit remain stayed to allow for potential resolution through the Program outside of court.

Legal correspondence / court filing (status report)
2025-12-26

016.pdf

This document is a status report filed on October 1, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein's executors (Indyke and Kahn) in the case of Jane Doe v. Indyke et al. The letter informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff intends to submit a claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. Consequently, both parties request that the court case remain stayed to save resources while the claim is processed through the Program.

Legal correspondence / status report
2025-12-26

014.pdf

A status report filed on August 14, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz regarding the case of Jane Doe v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The document informs Judge Freeman that the Plaintiff is submitting claims to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and requests that the legal action remain stayed.

Legal correspondence / court status report
2025-12-26

045.pdf

A status report filed on August 14, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated corporate entities. The document informs Judge Debra C. Freeman that Plaintiff Jane Doe 17 submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program on July 11, 2020. The parties request that the current lawsuit remain stayed pending the resolution of the compensation claim.

Legal correspondence / status report
2025-12-26

042.pdf

This document is a Court Order from the United States District Court Southern District of New York, dated March 6, 2020, in Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE. The order, signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman, officially relieves Andrew S. Buzin and Buzin Law, P.C. as counsel for the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17, in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and various associated corporations.

Court order
2025-12-26

041.pdf

A letter motion filed on March 6, 2020, by Andrew S. Buzin of Buzin Law P.C. requesting permission to withdraw as local counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe 17 in her case against Indyke and Kahn (executors of the Epstein estate). The client requested the discharge, and she remains represented by attorneys from Weisman, Brodie, Starr & Margolies, P.A. and Alan Goldfarb, P.A. The letter notes that the case is currently stayed pending the plaintiff's potential participation in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.

Legal correspondence / letter motion
2025-12-26

041-01.pdf

A court order from the Southern District of New York dated March 6, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. Judge Debra C. Freeman orders that attorney Andrew S. Buzin and his firm are relieved and discharged from representing the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17. The document lists numerous corporate defendants associated with Epstein's estate.

Court order
2025-12-26

061.pdf

This is a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order filed in the US District Court (SDNY) on June 12, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The parties agreed to stay (pause) the lawsuit for 60 days to allow the Plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims. If the claim is resolved through the program, the Plaintiff agrees to discontinue the legal action with prejudice.

Legal document (joint stipulation and proposed order)
2025-12-26

059.pdf

This document is a legal filing from June 3, 2020, submitted by Troutman Sanders LLP to the SDNY Court. It informs Judge Freeman that the Superior Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands has officially granted the motion to establish the 'Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.' The attached exhibit is the Order from the USVI court, signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn P. Hermon-Percell, authorizing the Co-Executors (Indyke and Kahn) to commence the program on or about June 15, 2020, following an agreement with the USVI Attorney General to lift liens to fund the program.

Legal correspondence and court order
2025-12-26

052.pdf

Legal correspondence from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Freeman regarding the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defense argues against the Plaintiff's request for a 21-year discovery period, stating the alleged abuse occurred only between 1999 and 2002, and asserts that they are already processing a database of over 730,000 documents. The document mentions that flight logs will be produced if the complaint alleges the Plaintiff traveled on Epstein's plane, but does not contain the logs themselves.

Legal correspondence / letter to judge
2025-12-26

042.pdf

A letter filed on April 15, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman. The letter requests a 30-day extension on various discovery and filing deadlines in three cases involving the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Judge signed and ordered the request on the same day.

Legal correspondence / court order
2025-12-26

015.pdf

A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Lorna G. Schofield dated January 2, 2020, regarding the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests the referral of the case to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman for general pretrial proceedings, noting that the plaintiff consents and that similar cases (specifically citing Teresa Helm and Juliette Bryant) have already been referred to her.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-12-26

047.pdf

This document is a Joint Stipulation and Order filed in June 2020 in the Southern District of New York, staying the lawsuit brought by Teala Davies against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The stay was requested to allow the plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative to litigation for resolving sexual abuse claims. Judge Debra C. Freeman signed the order on June 22, 2020, and directed the parties to submit a status report by August 14, 2020.

Legal court order (joint stipulation)
2025-12-26

038.pdf

A letter motion filed by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz on behalf of the Co-Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) requesting a 30-day extension on various court deadlines due to the pandemic. The request applies to cases involving plaintiffs Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, and Teala Davies. The motion was endorsed and ordered by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman on April 14, 2020.

Legal letter motion / court order
2025-12-26

037.pdf

A letter dated April 13, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman. The letter represents the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (Indyke and Kahn) in lawsuits brought by Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, and Teala Davies. It requests a 30-day extension for various discovery and filing deadlines due to the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that the Plaintiffs have consented to this request.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-12-26

024.pdf

Legal correspondence from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated February 26, 2020, regarding the case Teala Davies v. Indyke et al. The letter requests approval for a briefing schedule concerning a Motion to Dismiss filed by the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. It references prior settlement discussions held during a court conference on February 11, 2020.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-12-26

044.pdf

Court order from the Southern District of New York staying the case of Juliette Bryant v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein for 60 days. The stay was requested to allow the plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative to litigation. The order was signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman on June 15, 2020, with a directive to submit a status report by August 14, 2020.

Court order / joint stipulation
2025-12-26

043.pdf

This document is a joint stipulation filed on June 12, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, staying the lawsuit brought by Juliette Bryant against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein for 60 days. The stay is requested to allow Bryant to participate in the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims. Attorneys Sigrid McCawley (for Plaintiff) and Bennet J. Moskowitz (for Defendants) signed the agreement.

Legal stipulation and proposed order
2025-12-26

042.pdf

A letter from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra Freeman informing the SDNY court that the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands has officially authorized the establishment of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. The attached order, signed June 2, 2020, grants the motion to establish the program and authorizes its commencement on or about June 15, 2020, noting an agreement reached with the USVI Attorney General regarding liens and funding.

Legal correspondence and court order
2025-12-26

028.pdf

Legal correspondence dated May 8, 2020, from Matthew J. Aaronson (Troutman Sanders LLP) to Judge Debra C. Freeman. The letter represents the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Indyke and Kahn) and objects to the Plaintiffs' request for a pre-motion conference regarding discovery disputes. The defense argues the request is premature as the parties were still in the 'meet-and-confer' process, and requests either a denial of the conference or permission to respond by May 13, 2020.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-12-26

026.pdf

A letter dated April 15, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman requesting a 30-day extension for various deadlines in lawsuits filed by Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The request cites the ongoing pandemic as the reason for the delay and notes the consent of the plaintiffs. The document is signed 'SO ORDERED' by Judge Freeman on the same date.

Legal letter/motion and court order
2025-12-26

025.pdf

This document is a letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated April 15, 2020. It requests a 30-day extension for various discovery and filing deadlines in civil cases brought by Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, citing delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Legal correspondence (letter motion)
2025-12-26

EFTA00016286.pdf

This document is an opposition letter filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe's counsel against Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to stay civil proceedings in the case Doe v. Indyke. The Plaintiff argues that Maxwell has been actively participating in the litigation from jail (filing answers, issuing discovery requests) despite claiming it is a burden, and that a stay is not required for Plaintiff to participate in the Epstein Claims Resolution Program. The letter asserts that the public interest is best served by allowing the civil case to proceed to expose the criminal enterprise of Epstein and Maxwell.

Legal filing (opposition letter)
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00019319.jpg

This document is the third page of a legal letter from attorney David Boies to Judge Debra C. Freeman, dated May 18, 2020, regarding a civil case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Boies argues that the court should deny Maxwell's motion to stay discovery and her request for a pre-motion conference, citing Judge Schofield's previous comments that Maxwell's motion to dismiss lacks merit. The letter also asserts that the existence of the Epstein Estate's Victim Compensation Fund (in the Virgin Islands probate court) is not a valid reason to stay the current action without the Plaintiff's consent.

Legal letter/filing (page 3 of 3)
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity