Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Debra C. Freeman

Person
Mentions
106
Relationships
0
Events
13
Documents
53
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2021-07-22 N/A Court Order signed by Judge Freeman lifting the stay and setting deadlines. New York View
2021-06-30 N/A Filing of letter informing Court of desire to lift stay New York, NY View
2020-08-14 N/A Filing of Status Report requesting continuation of stay New York, NY View
2020-06-22 N/A Order Staying Action signed by Judge Freeman New York, New York View
2020-06-15 N/A Order signed and filed by Judge Debra Freeman New York, New York View
2020-04-15 N/A Judge Debra Freeman orders the extension of deadlines as requested. New York, NY View
2020-04-15 N/A Request for extension of legal deadlines due to COVID-19 pandemic submitted and approved by Judge... New York, NY View
2020-04-15 N/A Order granted by Judge Freeman New York, NY View
2020-04-14 N/A Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman endorsed the memorandum, granting the requested extension. New York, NY View
2020-04-14 N/A Court Order Granting Extension New York, NY View
2020-03-06 N/A Court Order filed relieving Andrew S. Buzin as counsel for Jane Doe 17 New York, New York View
2020-03-06 N/A Filing of letter motion to withdraw as counsel. New York View
2020-03-06 N/A Court Order issued relieving Andrew S. Buzin and Buzin Law, P.C. as counsel for Jane Doe 17. New York, New York View

DOJ-OGR-00019318.jpg

This legal document, dated May 18, 2020, is a filing arguing against defendant Maxwell's request to stay discovery in a civil case. The author contends that Maxwell has failed to justify the stay based on a parallel criminal investigation and that a potential claims resolution program involving co-defendant Epstein's Estate does not require litigation to be paused. The filing cites court transcripts and case law to support the position that discovery should proceed, as it may even be necessary to facilitate settlement.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00019317.jpg

This is a legal letter from attorney David Boies representing plaintiff Annie Farmer, addressed to Judge Debra C. Freeman on May 18, 2020. The letter argues against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's request to stay discovery in the civil case pending a criminal investigation, citing case law that characterizes such stays as extraordinary remedies when no indictment has yet been issued. Boies asserts that Maxwell's motion is an unjustified attempt to delay litigation.

Legal correspondence (response to pre-motion conference request)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00002816.jpg

This legal document, dated March 22, 2021, is a filing in a criminal case arguing against the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) discovery requests. The filing contends that requests for communications about co-conspirator Jean Luc Brunel, fee agreements with victims Annie and Maria Farmer, Annie Farmer's complete teenage journal, and materials from the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program are irrelevant and improper 'fishing expeditions' for impeachment material. The document cites case law to assert that the Defendant has failed to demonstrate the relevance and admissibility of the requested evidence.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search