A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team dated October 20, 2020, serving as a cover letter for a discovery production. The production includes various materials such as FBI documents from Florida and NY, PBPD materials, and videos, listed with Bates numbers. The letter also addresses the status of data extracted from electronic devices seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties, noting that privilege reviews are ongoing and that the Epstein Estate has not waived privilege.
This document is a 'Second Supplemental Privilege Log' from the case Jane Doe v. United States, listing internal DOJ, FBI, and USAO communications withheld from civil discovery. The log chronicles the timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation from late 2006 to August 2008, detailing the internal deliberations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), plea negotiations, and the drafting of the indictment. It reveals critical details such as internal disagreements over plea terms, Epstein's refusal to plead to anything other than 'assault on the plane,' Jay Lefkowitz's admission that he never intended Epstein to register as a sex offender, and the government's struggles with victim notification and harassment by Epstein's defense team.
This document is an NCIC (National Crime Information Center) inquiry response generated on October 6, 2021, by the FBI New York/NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services. It details a Protection Order (restraining order) originating from the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Office against a redacted subject. The order includes strict conditions such as staying away from the protected person, no communication, prohibition of firearms, and awarding temporary exclusive custody of children to the protected person.
This document is an email thread from December 15, 2008, involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney. The email discusses a meeting with the Palm Beach Police Chief regarding articles in the Palm Beach Daily News that highlighted the U.S. Attorney's Office was not informed of a 'release' (likely referring to Epstein's work release) until after the fact. The AUSA notes they informed the Chief about a letter sent to the Sheriff's Office, which the Chief intended to obtain via public records request.
Internal email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney (Ccing Alex Acosta) discussing a victims' lawyer's request to void Epstein's plea deal due to additional victims. The AUSA confirms they are bound by the agreement. The email also details a meeting with the Sheriff's Office where it was revealed Epstein's legal team (Goldberger, Starr) threatened to sue over unfavorable treatment, and that Epstein would be granted work release despite prior contradictions.
This document contains a November 2007 email thread involving the US Attorney's Office (Alex Acosta cc'd) discussing the logistics of Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing. Key topics include the strategic scheduling of the plea/sentencing on December 16th to 'reduce media frenzy,' the legal nuances of his 'sexual predator' designation, and the loophole allowing the Sheriff's Office (rather than State Corrections) to grant him work release. The emails also detail coordination with Epstein's lawyers (Lefkowitz and Goldberger) regarding victim notification and potential conflicts of interest.
This document is a 'Plea in the Circuit Court' recording Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. It outlines a sentence of 18 months total confinement in the Palm Beach County Detention Facility followed by 12 months of community control. The document includes extensive attachments of Florida Statutes (948.101 and 943.0435) detailing the specific legal requirements for community control and mandatory sexual offender registration.
This document appears to be page 30 of 114 from a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) dated July 26, 2017. The text outlines legal statutes (likely Florida law given the specific statute numbers) regarding the penalties for failing to provide information (specifically instant message names) and the requirement for the sheriff's office to update sexual offender information within two working days.
This page contains excerpted text from legal statutes (specifically Florida Statutes sections 794 and 800) regarding the definition of sexual offenses and the strict registration requirements for sexual offenders. It details the obligation to report personal data, including physical addresses, email addresses, instant message names, vehicle/vessel details, and higher education enrollment to the Sheriff's office or relevant department. The document was produced as part of a DOJ Public Records Request on July 26, 2017.
This document is page 24 of 114 from a DOJ Public Records Request (17-295) containing the text of Florida state statutes regarding sexual offender registration. The text details specific requirements for offenders to report changes in residence, employment, email/IM handles, and enrollment in higher education to the Sheriff's office and the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. It specifically outlines protocols for offenders living in vehicles or vessels and mandates reporting within 48 hours of status changes.
This document is a page from a legal text, likely a statute, dated July 26, 2017. It provides definitions for legal terms such as "Convicted" and "Institution of higher education" and outlines specific reporting requirements for sexual offenders. The text mandates that offenders must report in person to the local sheriff's office within 48 hours of certain events, including establishing a new residence, being released from custody, or being convicted of a qualifying offense.
This document appears to be Page 13 of a 114-page response to a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) dated July 26, 2017. The content is an excerpt of a legal statute (citing statutes 775.082, 775.083, and 775.084) outlining penalties for failing to register instant message names and mandating that the sheriff's office submit sexual offender information to the department within two working days. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp.
This legal document, dated July 26, 2017, outlines the registration and reporting requirements for sexual offenders. It details the conditions for lifetime registration, the legislature's justification for public disclosure based on public safety, and establishes that assisting a non-compliant offender is a third-degree felony. The document also specifies that offenders must report in person to their local sheriff's office twice a year.
This document is page 8 of 114 from a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) dated July 26, 2017. It contains the text of Florida state statutes detailing the registration requirements for sexual offenders, including updating driver's licenses, reporting changes of residence within 48 hours, registering email addresses, and the verification duties of local law enforcement under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006. No specific individuals are named; the text refers to generic legal subjects.
This document is an offense report from the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office. It details an incident where an individual fled to a neighbor's house, then assaulted someone, and was found to have taken Xanax bars. The case was cleared by arrest.
This document is a page from a sworn statement detailing the witness's traumatic experiences with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 1996. It describes alleged sexual misconduct involving the witness's younger sister, a sexual assault against the witness at Leslie Wexner's Ohio mansion, subsequent false imprisonment, and the reporting of these crimes to the FBI. The text also outlines the harassment and career destruction the witness faced from Epstein and Maxwell after reporting the assault.
This document is a LexisNexis printout of a Sun-Sentinel article from June 15, 2009, detailing a legal battle to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal with federal prosecutors. Palm Beach Circuit Judge Jeff Colbath acknowledged procedural failures in sealing the deal and set a hearing for June 25, while attorneys for Epstein's victims, Bill Berger and Brad Edwards, criticized the "sweetheart agreement" and special treatment Epstein received. The article notes Epstein was serving an 18-month sentence with work release privileges and that local police had forwarded information to the FBI due to dissatisfaction with the State Attorney's handling of the case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity