EFTA00013754.pdf

108 KB

Extraction Summary

7
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread
File Size: 108 KB
Summary

This document contains a November 2007 email thread involving the US Attorney's Office (Alex Acosta cc'd) discussing the logistics of Jeffrey Epstein's plea agreement and sentencing. Key topics include the strategic scheduling of the plea/sentencing on December 16th to 'reduce media frenzy,' the legal nuances of his 'sexual predator' designation, and the loophole allowing the Sheriff's Office (rather than State Corrections) to grant him work release. The emails also detail coordination with Epstein's lawyers (Lefkowitz and Goldberger) regarding victim notification and potential conflicts of interest.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Alex Acosta US Attorney (USAFLS)
Cc'd on the email chain regarding Epstein's plea and sentencing arrangements.
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Subject of the plea agreement discussions, work release eligibility, and sex offender designation.
Lefkowitz Defense Attorney
Likely Jay Lefkowitz; discussed plea terms, victim contact, and legal conflicts with the sender.
Jack Goldberger Defense Attorney
Asked by Lefkowitz to provide copies of agreements with the State.
Judge Davis Judge
Judge involved in the case; the sender is waiting to hear from him.
ASA Assistant State Attorney
Met with the FBI regarding the plea agreement and work release.
Jay Associate/Attorney
Will forward agreements to the sender.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
FBI
Met with the ASA regarding the plea agreement.
USAFLS
US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (Acosta's office).
Sheriff's Office
Will determine Epstein's eligibility for work release.
Florida Department of Corrections
Mentioned as not having jurisdiction over Epstein's work release while he is in jail.
The State
Refers to Florida state prosecutors/authorities.

Timeline (2 events)

2007-11-16
FBI meeting with the ASA regarding Epstein's plea agreement and work release.
Unknown
2007-12-16
Planned date for Plea & Sentencing (as of Nov 2007 discussion).
Court

Locations (2)

Location Context
Where Epstein is to be housed.
jurisdiction mentioned

Relationships (2)

Alex Acosta Prosecutor (USAFLS) / Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Acosta is Cc'd on emails discussing Epstein's plea and sentencing.
Lefkowitz Co-Defense Attorneys Jack Goldberger
Lefkowitz asked Goldberger to provide documents.

Key Quotes (5)

"plea & sentencing will take place on the same day (December 16th ) in order to reduce the media frenzy."
Source
EFTA00013754.pdf
Quote #1
"Epstein will be treated as a sex offender regardless of whether he registers or not."
Source
EFTA00013754.pdf
Quote #2
"Sheriff’s Office will determine whether Epstein is eligible for work release, not the Florida Department of Corrections."
Source
EFTA00013754.pdf
Quote #3
"[Lefkowitz] reserves [the] right to object to certain aspects of the §2255 provisions of the Agreement"
Source
EFTA00013754.pdf
Quote #4
"Lefkowitz confirmed that they will not contact any other victims."
Source
EFTA00013754.pdf
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,387 characters)

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: "Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)" [REDACTED]>, [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Epstein
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:31:42 +0000
Importance: Normal
Hi all – The FBI had their meeting with the ASA this morning. She wasn’t aware of the December 16th date, and she said that she could include something in their plea agreement about not being eligible for work release. When the FBI asked her if she would do that, she said she would have to talk to [REDACTED]. She also wouldn’t say whether they would oppose such a petition, if one were filed. [REDACTED] said that because Epstein is going to be housed at the jail, the Sheriff’s Office will determine whether Epstein is eligible for work release, not the Florida Department of Corrections. I have asked FBI to find out whether “sexual predators” (which will be Epstein’s legal designation) are eligible to participate in work release. I am still reviewing all of the statutes to see whether there is anything that would bar the judge from granting a petition for work release. As soon as I find an answer, I will let you know.
[REDACTED] would still like us to do the victim notifications. The State does not have a procedure (like we do federally) where the Court has to provide a separate room for victims who want to attend judicial proceedings, so I do not know how many victims will actually want to be present.
[REDACTED] – As soon as you hear from Judge Davis, can you let me know? It is going to take us a while to track down everyone, especially with the holiday, and I want to make sure they have been provided adequate notice.
Thank you.
[REDACTED BLOCK]
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 6:02 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: Acosta, Alex (USAFLS)
Subject: Epstein
[REDACTED] informs me that [REDACTED] said that the plea & sentencing will take place on the same day (December 16th ) in order to reduce the media frenzy. [REDACTED] said that Epstein will be treated as a sex offender regardless of whether he registers or not. He said that “registration” takes place after Epstein completes his sentence. Therefore, he will be treated like any other sex offender. The problem is that just like any other sex offender, he can petition the court for work release. When [REDACTED] asked [REDACTED] whether he was going to oppose such a petition, [REDACTED] responded that he will if it is in the agreement.
I spoke to Lefkowitz. Lefkowitz confirmed the above understanding. We did not, however, discuss anything about work release – just that Epstein will be a sex offender and he’ll be treated like any other sex offender.
Lefkowitz confirmed that they will not contact any other victims. He also asked Jack Goldberger to provide him with any copies of agreements etc. he has with the State. Jay will forward them to me as soon as he receives them.
Finally, Lefkowitz said that the statement in his letter that he “reserves [the] right to object to certain aspects of the §2255 provisions of the Agreement” refers to their belief that a lawyer who files a lawsuit for some of the class may have a direct conflict that may disqualify him/his firm if he’s accepting fees to negotiate the settlement of the other members of the class. Lefkowitz point out the potential conflict to whoever is selected. My view is that those issues are between Epstein’s lawyers and the victims’ lawyers.
EFTA00013755

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document