| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN (Questioner)
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Attorneys Lewis and Tein visit Epstein in jail. | Jail attorney room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Attorneys high-five in the hallway regarding fees. | Jail hallway | View |
| 2012-10-16 | N/A | Proposed dinner with Bobby Slayton, David, Lewis, and potentially Woody (Date inferred as Oct 16 ... | Likely NY | View |
This document is a log of electronic messages from November 2018, extracted from a House Oversight investigation file. It details a conversation between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an alias associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The exchange involves a trivia fact about Shari Lewis and her puppet 'Lamb Chop' testifying before Congress, followed by a suggestion to 'bring lamb chop tomorrow' and the response 'Don't fuck with 'the chop''.
This document appears to be a personal narrative or draft written by Jeffrey Epstein reflecting on his legal representation and crimes. He criticizes his lawyers, Lewis and Tein, accusing them of celebrating his ongoing legal troubles for the sake of fees, and explicitly admits to being a 'john' who paid for sex while attempting to minimize the severity of his crimes by comparing them to jaywalking and claiming state attorneys found 'no real victims.' He discusses the age of consent in New York versus Florida and argues that the women involved were knowing participants.
An email from Lesley Groff to Jeffrey Epstein dated September 10, 2012, coordinating a dinner with Bobby Slayton, David Brenner, and others. Slayton inquires if Epstein is 'hosting Obama' in New York. The email also tracks the schedules of associates Lyn, Jojo, and Linda Stone.
This document appears to be page 161 from a book or academic text discussing network theory, 'power law distributed' systems, and the growth strategies of tech giants like Facebook (specifically the 'seven friends in ten days' metric). It references works by Chamath Palihapitiya, Brian Arthur, and Albert-Lazlo Barabási. While labeled with a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation cache, the text itself discusses sociological and economic theories behind social media dominance rather than specific criminal activities.
This document appears to be page 160 of a book or report included in a House Oversight investigation file (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018392). The text discusses the economic theories of 'Arthur' (likely W. Brian Arthur) regarding 'network effects' and 'increasing returns' in the technology sector. It analyzes the monopolistic dominance of companies like Microsoft, Google, and Facebook, noting how user adoption creates a lock-in effect that stifles competition.
This document is a transcript of a contentious legal proceeding, likely a deposition. It captures a heated exchange between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, who appear to be opposing attorneys, regarding the questioning of an unnamed female witness. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's conduct, accusing him of berating the witness, leading to a personal argument where names are mistaken and prior court encounters are mentioned.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a $50 million lawsuit recently filed on their behalf against Jeffrey Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects, citing attorney-client privilege and instructing his client not to answer if their knowledge comes only from their protected conversations. The exchange becomes tense, with Mr. Leopold mistakenly calling the questioning attorney 'Lewis'.
This document is page 10 of The Virgin Islands Daily News from November 9, 2012. It contains a police blotter with reports of arrests and incidents on St. Croix, St. Thomas, and St. John, as well as obituaries for residents John B. Weekes Sr., Paula Gonzalez Martinez, and Iva Williams, and a funeral schedule. The document is marked with the identifier 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018868', indicating it was collected as part of a U.S. House Oversight Committee investigation, but the page content itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.
Alleged comment caught on microphone: 'This is going to be a couple more years of fees'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity