| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Arthur "Kiyama" Lewis
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Goldberger
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Involved in civil litigation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Attorneys Lewis and Tein visit Epstein in jail. | Jail attorney room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where Mr. Tein questions a witness about a MySpace message. The witness's counsel, M... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Attorneys high-five in the hallway regarding fees. | Jail hallway | View |
| 2010-09-29 | N/A | A legal deposition where a witness is questioned about their connection to Jeffrey Epstein. | null | View |
| 2008-08-12 | N/A | Clerk's office unsealed Tein's reply brief in the Epstein civil litigation. | Court | View |
| 2008-07-18 | N/A | Letter sent to Tein and Goldberger (Friday prior to July 21, 2008). | West Palm Beach, FL (Sender... | View |
| 2004-09-29 | N/A | A deposition is taking place, as indicated by the Q&A format, presence of counsel, and the witnes... | Unknown | View |
This document is a formal legal letter dated May 15, 2009, from Robert C. Josefsberg of Podhurst Orseck to Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys (Robert Critton and Jack Goldberger). The letter demands the immediate preservation of all evidence, particularly electronically stored information (ESI), relevant to pending civil actions by victims of Epstein's sexual exploitation. It specifically references the Non-Prosecution Agreement, the 2005 FBI raid, and warns that failure to preserve data could result in sanctions for spoliation.
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SD FL) to Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Lefkowitz and Black) dated August 20, 2008. The letter addresses the implementation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, specifically the payment of fees to Special Master representative Robert Josefsberg and disputes regarding victim notification lists. The U.S. Attorney offers an ultimatum: stick to the September 2007 victim list (leaving Epstein open to prosecution for later-identified victims) or include victims known as of June 30, 2008, which would require Epstein to compensate them.
This document is an automated email read receipt generated by Alex Acosta (USAFLS) on August 12, 2008. It confirms that Acosta read an email with the subject 'Tein's Reply Brief in the Epstein civil litigation'. The recipient of this receipt is redacted.
This document is an internal email thread from July 21, 2008, between staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS). The discussion centers on a New York Post article titled 'Bid to Burn Epstein Plea' and confirms that a letter was sent to attorneys Tein and Goldberger on the previous Friday. The emails include an attachment titled '080717_Tein_Goldberger_Ltr.pdf'.
This email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney to Alex Acosta on August 12, 2008, discusses the unsealing of Tein's reply brief in the Epstein civil litigation, highlighting Tein's extensive quoting from a "highly unusual and unprecedented deferred-prosecution agreement." The sender also notes they have not received an update from Roy Black regarding a defense agreement filed with the state court.
This document is a concordance (index) page from a legal transcript produced by Consor & Associates. It lists words starting with 'S' through 'T'—including 'Tein', 'Ted', 'testimony', and 'Swiss'—along with the specific page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The document bears a Department of Justice Office of Government Relations (DOJ-OGR) stamp and a Public Records Request number.
This document appears to be a personal narrative or draft written by Jeffrey Epstein reflecting on his legal representation and crimes. He criticizes his lawyers, Lewis and Tein, accusing them of celebrating his ongoing legal troubles for the sake of fees, and explicitly admits to being a 'john' who paid for sex while attempting to minimize the severity of his crimes by comparing them to jaywalking and claiming state attorneys found 'no real victims.' He discusses the age of consent in New York versus Florida and argues that the women involved were knowing participants.
A contentious Q&A session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about evading process servers with the help of their manager.
A deposition where a witness is questioned about an incident involving evading process servers.
A contentious Q&A session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about evading process servers with the help of their manager.
A deposition where Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein, with Mr. Leopold frequently objecting.
The entire document is a transcript of a legal questioning session.
A deposition where an unnamed deponent is questioned by Mr. Tein about the selection of and a meeting with her lawyer, Mr. Herman.
A contentious Q&A session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about evading process servers with the help of their manager.
A contentious Q&A session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about evading process servers with the help of their manager.
A formal questioning session where Mr. Tein asks the witness about their knowledge of victim notifications and evidence in a case.
The document is a transcript of a deposition where a witness is questioned about a press conference and a related photograph (Exhibit 20-01).
Transcript of a deposition where a witness is questioned about their selection of and meeting with their lawyer, Mr. Herman.
A transcript of questions and answers regarding the witness's knowledge of 'Tony' and police reports.
Transcript of questioning where Mr. Tein asks the witness about transportation to a Grand Jury hearing and about false information on their MySpace page.
Transcript of a deposition where MR. TEIN questions an unnamed witness about Mr. Epstein.
Transcript of a deposition where MR. TEIN questions an unnamed witness about Mr. Epstein.
A question-and-answer session where the witness is asked about the selection of and a meeting with their lawyer, Mr. Herman. MR. LEOPOLD objects to a question about the meeting's substance, citing attorney-client privilege.
A transcript of questions and answers regarding the witness's knowledge of 'Tony' and police reports.
Mr. Tein questions the witness about a lawsuit. Mr. Leopold objects and instructs the witness not to answer based on attorney-client privilege.
The document is a transcript of a deposition where a witness is questioned about a press conference and a related photograph (Exhibit 20-01).
The document is a transcript of a deposition where a witness is questioned about a press conference and a related photograph (Exhibit 20-01).
Mr. Tein questions the witness about lying about her age to Jeffrey Epstein and a prior statement made to Detective Pagan. Mr. Leopold and Ms. Belohlavek repeatedly object to the questions.
A contentious Q&A session where Mr. Tein questions a witness about evading process servers with the help of their manager.
The document is a transcript of a deposition where a witness is questioned about a press conference and a related photograph (Exhibit 20-01).
Mr. Tein questions the witness about an incident involving avoiding process servers. The witness denies being hidden but states their manager, Justin, lied for them by saying they were not present.
Transcript of a deposition where MR. TEIN questions an unnamed witness about Mr. Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity