| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Melanie Spinella
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Nicholas Ribis
|
Correspondents |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Jes
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Kathy Ruemmler
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Kathy Ruemmler
|
Correspondents advisor advisee |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Richard Kahn
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Joscha Bach
|
Correspondents |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Steve Bannon
|
Unknown |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
David I. Schoen
|
Correspondents |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Thomas Jr., Landon
|
Correspondents |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Larry Visoski
|
Employee |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Trump
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Melanie Spinella
|
Correspondent |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Kathy Ruemmler
|
Correspondents |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Steve Bannon
|
Correspondents |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
macgiver
|
Acquaintance |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Leon Black
|
Correspondent |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Lesley Groff
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Darren Indyke
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Bill Gates
|
Correspondent |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Brad Wechsler
|
Correspondent collaborator |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Richard Kahn
|
Correspondent |
8
Strong
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-04-16 | N/A | Stay cut short | Unspecified (implied wherev... | View |
| 2017-04-16 | N/A | Visit cut short | Unknown (Location where Jag... | View |
| 2017-04-16 | N/A | Guest stay cut short | Unspecified (Epstein property) | View |
| 2017-04-07 | N/A | Discussion about arranging a meeting between Jeffrey Epstein and an unnamed person, presumed to b... | Unknown | View |
| 2017-03-30 | N/A | Anil Ambani sent an email with an attached news article to Jeffrey E. The article concerned a pot... | N/A | View |
| 2017-03-22 | N/A | Paul Krassner sent an email to Jeffrey Epstein, forwarding a Washington Post headline about the c... | N/A | View |
| 2017-03-15 | N/A | A discussion about a legal case involving crossing the 'government's star witness'. | Unknown | View |
| 2017-03-14 | N/A | Speculation that 'trump' leaked '2 pages' related to a legal case. | Unknown | View |
| 2017-03-06 | N/A | A discussion about a licensing problem potentially caused by 'jack morris partner marino', and th... | Unknown | View |
| 2017-03-01 | N/A | Proposed travel itinerary from Jeffrey E.'s email, including trips to 'lsj', Palm Beach, New York... | lsj, Palm Beach, New York, ... | View |
| 2017-03-01 | N/A | A proposed travel schedule from Jeffrey E.'s email: Monday to lsj; Thursday to Palm Beach; Sunday... | lsj, Palm Beach, New York, ... | View |
| 2017-02-15 | N/A | Michael Wolff requests introductions to Tom Barrack and Kathy Ruemmler from Jeffrey Epstein to ge... | View | |
| 2017-02-15 | N/A | Email exchange regarding introductions for Michael Wolff's book. | Digital (Email) | View |
| 2017-02-10 | N/A | Proposed phone call | Phone | View |
| 2017-02-08 | N/A | Email discussion between Jeffrey E., Ariane de Rothschild, and EL HACHEM Johnny regarding infrast... | Virtual (Email) | View |
| 2017-02-08 | N/A | An email discussion between Jeffrey E., Ariane de Rothschild, and EL HACHEM Johnny concerning pot... | N/A (email correspondence) | View |
| 2017-02-06 | N/A | Confirmed departure at 4:00 PM and a scheduled departure time of 4:30 PM for Jeffrey Epstein's pa... | Unspecified (implied to be ... | View |
| 2017-02-06 | N/A | Confirmed departure. The original email from Jeffrey E. specified the destination as 'lsj'. | From an unspecified airport... | View |
| 2017-01-30 | N/A | Jeffrey E. sent an email with a news article link to Leon Black. Leon Black's office (Melanie) re... | N/A | View |
| 2017-01-30 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sent a news article link to Leon Black. Black's assistant, Melanie, replied that ... | N/A | View |
| 2017-01-30 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein sent an email containing a link to a New York Daily News article to Leon Black. A... | N/A | View |
| 2017-01-21 | N/A | Epstein claims to have been 'there' (referring to Cambridge based on context) all day. | Cambridge | View |
| 2017-01-20 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein's Birthday | Unknown | View |
| 2017-01-20 | N/A | Planned meeting in New York | New York | View |
| 2017-01-20 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein's birthday / Trump Inauguration. | N/A | View |
This document is an email chain from February 2016 involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias Jeffrey E.), Kathy Ruemmler, and Stephen J. Immelt. The core of the conversation is a job negotiation where Immelt is trying to recruit Ruemmler, suggesting she meet with Michael Davison, the company's 'global head of litigation'. Ruemmler forwards the exchange to Epstein, who advises her that getting things 'in writing would be best'.
This document is an email exchange from January 22, 2016, between Jeffrey E. (from jeevacation@gmail.com) and an unnamed recipient. Jeffrey E. writes that a recent conversation with someone named 'macgiver' was disturbing, to which the recipient replies by asking what was disturbing and if 'he' is 'losing it'. The email includes a repeated legal disclaimer stating the communication is the property of 'JEE'.
This document is an email chain from January 22-23, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler. They are discussing a third individual, referred to as 'clinton', whom Ruemmler describes as being 'very close to being a psychopath' with 'no conscience'. Epstein details a personal falling out with 'clinton' over contradictory statements, and the two correspond about this individual's manipulative character.
This document is an email thread from January 22-23, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein and Kathy Ruemmler. They discuss Epstein's disturbing conversation with an individual named 'macgiver,' whom Ruemmler describes as being 'very close to being a psychopath' with 'no conscience.' In the exchange, Epstein also recounts a past incident that caused him to stop talking to 'clinton' after Clinton allegedly swore to two contradictory statements.
This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein to Bill Gates, dated September 15, 2015. Epstein asks if Gates will be in New York during the week of September 28th, referencing the 'general assembly clinton week,' likely referring to the UN General Assembly and the Clinton Global Initiative. The email suggests an attempt by Epstein to arrange a meeting with Gates during this period.
This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein to Sultan Bin Sulayem on July 24, 2015, discussing a new, expensive cholesterol-lowering drug called Praluent. Epstein's email is a reply to an inquiry from Sulayem, who had forwarded a Forbes article announcing the FDA's approval of the drug, which is administered as a shot.
This document is an April 2015 email from Jeffrey Epstein to MIT Media Lab director Joichi Ito. Ito informs Epstein that 'gift funds,' implicitly from Epstein, were used to hire key Bitcoin core developers (including Gavin Andresen) for the Lab's new Digital Currency Initiative. This move was made possible by the recent collapse of the developers' previous sponsor, the Bitcoin Foundation, representing a 'big win' for the MIT Media Lab.
This document is a heavily redacted email from 'jeffrey E.' (jeevacation@gmail.com) to attorney Martin Weinberg on April 23, 2015. The email is a reply to a previous message from Weinberg, and the subject line, 'Re: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE', indicates the communication is legally protected, with the content of both messages being completely withheld.
Jeffrey E. replies to an email from Ehud Barak regarding a CNBC video about the Iran nuke deal. Barak had sent the link with the notes "Bill Clinton 1994. Food for thought.", and Jeffrey E. points out that the interview in the video is Barak's own.
This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein to journalist Michael Wolff, dated March 31, 2015, in which Epstein forwards a detailed list of fact-checking questions from Alex Yablon of New York Magazine. The questions probe into Epstein's personal life, wealth, business dealings, and his relationships with various individuals, including Wolff, Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Eva Andersson Dubin, and his female support staff. The questions imply potential romantic or transactional relationships with staff and question a $20 million investment offer to Wolff.
This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein to Darren Indyke, dated March 31, 2015, forwarding a message he received earlier that day from journalist Alex Yablon. Yablon's email contains a comprehensive list of fact-checking questions for a New York Magazine story, probing into Epstein's personal life, wealth, business dealings, and relationships. The questions cover specific events, financial transactions, and his associations with high-profile individuals like Bill Gates, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz, as well as the nature of his relationship with his 'support staff of young women'.
This document is an email sent by Jeffrey Epstein from 'jeevacation@gmail.com' to Bill Gates and Larry Cohen on January 19, 2015. Epstein sardonically remarks that he "won't be able to run for office for a while" and comments on the transfer of over $3 trillion in wealth from the Forbes 400, speculating that President Obama would unsuccessfully attempt to eliminate the 'step-up' tax basis for inherited assets. The document includes a standard confidentiality disclaimer and is marked with the identifier 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026347'.
This document is an email chain from October 14-15, 2014, between Jeffrey Epstein and former White House Counsel Kathryn Ruemmler. Ruemmler shares a Bloomberg article about her being a top candidate to become the next Attorney General, after which she and Epstein quickly arrange to speak by phone. The exchange indicates a familiar and direct line of communication between the two.
This document is an email from Jeffrey Epstein ('Jeffrey E.') to Kathy Ruemmler on September 20, 2014. Epstein's one-word reply, "Wow", is in response to a link Ruemmler sent him for a Wikisource page detailing Senator Barack Obama's floor statement on the nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General. The email includes a legal disclaimer stating the communication is confidential and the property of 'JEE'.
This document is an email chain from August 2018 between Robert Kuhn and Jeffrey E. (at jeevacation@gmail.com). Kuhn shares links to his media appearances on CNBC and Fox Business and attempts to arrange a meeting in New York between Jeffrey E. and his colleague, Peter Getzels, to discuss a project called 'Radical Breakthroughs'.
This document is an email exchange from August 10-11, 2018, between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com). Bannon shares a New York Magazine article about himself, to which Epstein replies, 'calling mnuchin stupid was a lol.' Bannon then adds the comment, 'And Cohn corrupt.'
This document is an email exchange from August 3, 2018, between Jeffrey Epstein and Steve Bannon. Bannon forwards a memo to Epstein outlining a political strategy to run a third-party candidate in the 2020 election to challenge Trump, suggesting it might be a better option than relying on the Democrats. Epstein responds to a news article Bannon had sent, in which Bannon criticized the Kochs, by commenting 'loved , not donors - but marks'.
This document is an email exchange from August 3, 2018, between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein sends Bannon a political analysis discussing the 2018 midterms, the political climate under President Trump, and the need for a 'back-up plan' or 'chaos' candidate for 2020. Bannon replies by asking Epstein for the source of the text, indicating the analysis may not be Epstein's original writing.
This document is an email from political strategist Juleanna Glover to Jeffrey Epstein on August 3, 2018. Glover forwards an analysis she wrote about the 2018 political landscape, mentioning it was also sent to a "circle of third party thinkers." The memo discusses the divisiveness of the Trump presidency, the Kavanaugh nomination, the Mueller investigation, and posits the idea of a third-party "chaos" candidate for the 2020 presidential election.
This document is an email chain from late July 2018 between Jeffrey Epstein and an unidentified correspondent. They discuss a potential meeting in New York in September and a rumor about GCC leaders meeting with President Trump, which Epstein dismisses as 'Unlikely'. The exchange begins with Epstein asking, 'now where is my friend?'
This document is an email chain from late July 2018 involving Jeffrey Epstein. The conversation mentions a potential meeting in New York in September, a planned meeting between "GCC leaders" and "Trump" around September 5th, and includes an ambiguous message from Epstein asking, "now where is my friend?". The document includes a standard confidentiality notice from "JEE" and is marked as a House Oversight Committee document.
This document is an email chain from April-July 2018 between attorney David I. Schoen and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email 'jeevacation@gmail.com' and identified by the initials 'JEE'). Schoen checks in on Epstein regarding his past litigation and expresses sympathy over a recent article linking him to the #metoo movement and Trump. Epstein sends a cryptic reply asking 'judge jeannie?', likely referring to Judge Jeanine Pirro.
This document is an email exchange from July 4, 2018, originating from a House Oversight collection. Attorney David Schoen writes to Jeffrey Epstein, harshly criticizing the composition of Robert Mueller's special counsel team, alleging specific members like Andrew Weissmann, Jeannie Rhee, and Greg Andres have a history of prosecutorial misconduct and extreme anti-Trump/pro-Clinton bias. Epstein replies briefly, questioning if Schoen's concerns are 'overblown' and drawing parallels to other prosecutors.
This document is an email chain from July 2018 between Jeffrey Epstein (using 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and lawyer David I. Schoen. Schoen provides commentary on various legal and political figures he alleges are biased (Jeannie Rhee, Greg Andres), while Epstein asks questions comparing prosecutors. Schoen also expresses sympathy for the negative press and legal troubles Epstein is facing, mentioning an article connecting him to '#metoo' and Trump.
This document is an email chain from July 4, 2018, involving Jeffrey Epstein (using the email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and an unidentified correspondent. The correspondent refers to Alan Dershowitz as Epstein's 'friend' and heavily criticizes the Mueller investigation, accusing team member Andrew Weissmann of being a 'Pathological Liar' and alleging that officials Peter Strzok and Andrew McCabe conspired to stop Donald Trump from becoming president. Epstein's reply discusses the nature of Strzok's testimony and questions about prosecutorial bias.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-01 | Paid | jeffrey E. | Paul Barrett / Ri... | $0.00 | Trading losses described as 'a great deal of mo... | View |
| 2018-01-23 | Paid | jeffrey E. | Diane Ziman's son... | $0.00 | A fundraising request was made by Diane Ziman t... | View |
| 2018-01-23 | Paid | jeffrey E. | Diane Ziman's son... | $0.00 | A fundraising request was made by Diane Ziman t... | View |
| 2018-01-23 | Paid | jeffrey E. | Diane Ziman's son... | $0.00 | A fundraising request was made by Diane Ziman t... | View |
| 2017-07-25 | Paid | jeffrey E. | Unnamed woman | $0.00 | Jeffrey E. sent an unspecified amount of money ... | View |
| 2017-07-25 | Paid | jeffrey E. | Unnamed woman | $0.00 | Jeffrey E. sent an unspecified amount of money ... | View |
| 2017-02-15 | Paid | jeffrey E. | Unknown | $0.00 | Discussion of funding. Epstein asks: 'is it a c... | View |
| 2016-11-27 | Received | Marc Leon | jeffrey E. | $35.00 | Mention of price negotiation: 'I have mine at 3... | View |
| 2016-11-11 | Received | Jabor | jeffrey E. | $0.00 | Discussion regarding future contact about 'e-cu... | View |
Epstein refers to 'the exact same email that i presented to you and brad two years.ago' regarding his thoughts on an 'overall redo'.
Epstein refers to 'the exact same email that i presented to you and brad two years.ago' regarding his thoughts on an 'overall redo'.
going to artists studio s much more appropriate , i think
Talk in 40?
please call me asap
What was Justin bill ? nd total to date?
actually I found I can buy an economy (YUK) ticket for only $1300.. so maybe I can buy that and try to upgrade it using miles..
Jeffrey E. tells Kathy Ruemmler he will call her from New York.
States 'Rich person problem'.
Forwards a quote from 'Morris' describing the Trump era as a 'horror movie'.
Argues that Trump's failure to disclose and his lies make it clear he knew his actions were illegal.
Suggests Trump's argument is that using his own money was not illegal. Mentions that he spoke with 'starr' the previous day about indictments and a potential deal for Trump.
Shares a story from The New York Times about the 'principled case for impeachment'.
Jeffrey E. tells Kathy Ruemmler he will call her from New York.
States 'Rich person problem'.
Forwards a quote from 'Morris' describing the Trump era as a 'horror movie'.
Argues that Trump's failure to disclose and his lies make it clear he knew his actions were illegal.
Jeffrey E. tells Kathy Ruemmler he will call her from New York.
States 'Rich person problem'.
Forwards a quote from 'Morris' describing the Trump era as a 'horror movie'.
Argues that Trump's failure to disclose and his lies make it clear he knew his actions were illegal.
Suggests Trump's argument is that using his own money was not illegal. Mentions that he spoke with 'starr' the previous day about indictments and a potential deal for Trump.
Shares a story from The New York Times about the 'principled case for impeachment'.
Suggests Trump's argument is that using his own money was not illegal. Mentions that he spoke with 'starr' the previous day about indictments and a potential deal for Trump.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity