U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
OrganizationRelationship Network
EFTA00027770.pdf
This document is an email from May 2019 forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Epstein Victims Demand Apology From Prosecutors'. The article details how two victims (Jane Does) requested a Florida federal court to nullify the 2008 non-prosecution agreement signed by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, arguing it violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The victims sought nullification of the deal, a reopening of the criminal case, an apology, and a hearing with Acosta and Epstein present.
EFTA00014092.pdf
This document outlines the confidential terms of Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. It details his agreement to plead guilty to state charges including lewd battery on a child and solicitation of minors, in exchange for a recommended two-year prison sentence. Crucially, the agreement stipulates that once the state plea is entered, the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office will close their federal investigations.
DOJ-OGR-00023337.tif
This document is an excerpt from a legal agreement or plea agreement involving Epstein. It details conditions of his plea, including waiving rights to challenge information and appeal, and not contesting the jurisdiction or victim status of minors. The agreement outlines the United States' obligations to provide a victim list and seek a guardian ad litem, and sets dates for Epstein's sentencing (September 28, 2007) and commencement of sentence (October 15, 2007).
DOJ-OGR-00021057.jpg
This document is page 'ix' from a legal filing, specifically Document 59 in Case 22-1426, dated February 28, 2023. It serves as a table of authorities, listing numerous U.S. court cases with their legal citations and corresponding page references within the larger document. The cases cited span from 1926 to 2017 and originate from various federal district and circuit courts.
DOJ-OGR-00002164.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on December 18, 2020. It lists numerous U.S. federal court cases, dating from 1985 to 2019, that are cited as legal precedent in the main document. The cases cover various federal districts and circuits, with a significant number originating from courts in New York.
DOJ-OGR-00021501.jpg
This legal document outlines several terms of an agreement with Epstein, stipulating that he must waive challenges to information from the State Attorney's Office, enter a guilty plea by September 28, 2007, and begin his sentence by October 15, 2007. In exchange, the United States will provide his attorneys with a list of up to forty victims and move for the appointment of a guardian ad litem. The document also details Epstein's waiver of his constitutional right to a speedy trial.
DOJ-OGR-00021329.jpg
This document appears to be page 129 of a Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report, filed within the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The text analyzes legal precedents (such as *United States v. Marquez* and *State v. Frazier*) to establish that plea agreements involving promises of leniency toward third parties are generally valid and do not constitute an abuse of prosecutorial discretion. It also establishes that the five attorneys subject to this OPR investigation were evaluated under the local rules of the Southern District of Florida.
DOJ-OGR-00021253.jpg
This document outlines the specific terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the government and Jeffrey Epstein, requiring a guilty plea to state charges involving minors and a two-year prison sentence. It details the legal statutes violated (Florida statutes regarding lewd battery, solicitation, and sexual activity with minors) and stipulates that federal investigations would close upon his state sentencing. The document also includes a narrative section describing the contentious negotiation process between July and September 2007, noting the prosecution's frustration with defense tactics.
DOJ-OGR-00004623.jpg
This document is page 3 of the controversial 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the United States (Southern District of Florida). It outlines that Epstein must plead guilty and be sentenced by September 28, 2007, and begin his sentence by October 15, 2007. It specifically limits the list of identified victims provided to the defense to 'not exceed forty' and stipulates that Epstein acknowledges these victims were minors. It also details waivers regarding the statute of limitations and speedy trial rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010581.jpg
This page from a House Oversight report details the timeline between June 27 and July 11, 2008, regarding the violation of victims' rights (CVRA) in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It highlights that AUSA Villafaña failed to inform victims' attorney Edwards that Epstein's state plea would preclude federal prosecution. Consequently, victims E.W. and L.M. only discovered the plea deal was finalized during a hearing on July 11, 2008, after Edwards had filed a federal action to enforce their rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023049.jpg
This article from The Virgin Islands Daily News details the 'unusual level of collaboration' between federal prosecutors (including Alexander Acosta and A. Marie Villafana) and Jeffrey Epstein's legal team during the negotiation of his non-prosecution agreement. It highlights the exclusion of victims from the process, the 'VIP treatment' Epstein received in jail (including work release authorized by Sheriff Ric Bradshaw), and subsequent legal battles by victims like 'Jane Doe No. 1' (Wild) and Jena-Lisa Jones to invalidate the agreement. The document also reveals that in 2011, the NY District Attorney's office under Cyrus Vance argued on Epstein's behalf to reduce his sex offender status, a move that shocked the presiding judge.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011940.jpg
This document outlines allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and Jean Luc Brunel regarding the trafficking and sexual abuse of underage girls, citing FBI investigations and court complaints. It details specific accusations including the purchase of a 14-year-old, the use of the MC2 modeling agency to lure minors, and Epstein's attempts to evade prosecution through political connections and donations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011933.jpg
This document is a printout of a blog post dated August 11, 2010, referencing a Jezebel article about sex trafficking allegations involving Jeffrey Epstein and the MC2 Modeling Agency. It details a court complaint alleging a racketeering pattern by Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jean Luc Brunel, and others to lure minors. The text also highlights Epstein's $100,000 donations to the Palm Beach Police Department and specific allegations of purchasing a 14-year-old girl and receiving children as birthday presents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013337.jpg
This document page details the timeline and nature of multiple civil lawsuits filed against Jeffrey Epstein around 2008 by attorneys Brad Edwards and the firm Herman and Mermelstein. It describes complaints alleging sexual assault of minors filed in Florida and New York, including a specific suit by Ava Cordero.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013334.jpg
This document outlines the timeline surrounding the violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the Jeffrey Epstein case during June and July 2008. It details how AUSA Villafaña withheld critical information from victims' attorney Brad Edwards regarding the finality of the plea agreement and its impact on federal prosecution. Consequently, Edwards filed a lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida to enforce the rights of victims E.W. and L.M., who only learned the plea deal was finalized during a hearing on July 11, 2008.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029769.jpg
This document is a printout of an investigative article by Conchita Sarnoff (The Daily Beast, 2010) bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It details Jeffrey Epstein's financial ties to alleged trafficker Jean Luc Brunel ($1M transfer), donations to the Palm Beach Police to curry favor, and the use of the MC2 modeling agency to lure minors. It also highlights flight logs listing unnamed 'females' and Epstein's defense of Brunel.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014047.jpg
This document is a page from a legal journal (Vol. 104) discussing the federal case 'Does v. United States' and the controversial nonprosecution agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein by the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of Florida. The text details how, despite evidence that Epstein molested over 30 girls between 2001 and 2007, he was allowed to plead to lesser state charges after a 'year-long assault on the prosecution' by his defense team. The page includes footnotes citing court documents, media reports connecting Epstein to Prince Andrew, and a letter from former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta regarding the pressure faced by prosecutors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021667.jpg
This document is page 2 of a Daily Beast article from July 2010 detailing the operations of Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring. It discusses the complicity of his staff (Kellen, Ross, Groff, Marcinkova, and Maxwell), the settlements paid to victims, and the testimony of house manager Alfredo Rodriguez regarding police corruption and the daily operations of the abuse. It also highlights Epstein's financial ties to the Palm Beach Police Department and his alleged racketeering partnership with modeling agent Jean Luc Brunel.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014092.jpg
This document page outlines the factual background for a motion to compel production of documents in the case Bradley Edwards vs. Dershowitz. It details Jane Doe No. 3's attempts to join a case regarding Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, her allegations of being trafficked to Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz, and Dershowitz's subsequent alleged defamatory media statements against attorneys Edwards and Cassell.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity