MacDonald
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Author
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey MacDonald
|
Spouses |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970-02-17 | N/A | Murders of Colette, Kimberly, and Kristen MacDonald | MacDonald Home | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019382.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Case 20-3061) argues that an order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to amend a Protective Order is not subject to interlocutory appeal. The text cites various legal precedents (Nelson, Midland Asphalt, Punn) to support the argument that her rights to a fair trial can be vindicated after a final judgment or during the criminal trial itself. It addresses Maxwell's concern that unsealing documents in civil cases might prejudice her criminal trial, asserting she can raise those issues in the criminal case if they arise.
DOJ-OGR-00019359.jpg
This document is page 17 of a legal filing (dated September 16, 2020) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-3061). The text argues that the court order denying Maxwell's motion to amend a Protective Order is not eligible for interlocutory appeal. It addresses Maxwell's concern that her inability to use criminal discovery in civil litigation might lead to the unsealing of civil documents, potentially prejudicing her criminal trial, by stating she can raise these prejudice issues during the criminal trial itself.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017316.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or legal essay dated April 2, 2012. The author discusses the 'MacDonald case' and argues against the legal system's refusal to admit new scientific evidence (specifically DNA) after conviction. The text recounts an anecdote where the author received a letter from a man who had already been executed, asking for posthumous DNA testing to clear his name, only for the author to discover the evidence had been destroyed upon execution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017282.jpg
This document appears to be a draft manuscript (dated 4.2.12) written by a lawyer (likely Alan Dershowitz, based on the style and provenance of the file) regarding the Jeffrey MacDonald murder case. The text critiques the suppression of scientific evidence in the case and recounts how the author, initially skeptical of MacDonald's innocence, became convinced to help him after a chance meeting at Terminal Island Federal Prison. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a larger production of documents, potentially related to the Epstein investigation where Dershowitz was a key figure.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity