Mr. Rodriguez
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Four federal agents/prosecutors
|
Interaction with law enforcement |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal conviction | Mr. Rodriguez was convicted of trying to extort money. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal case | United States v. Rodriguez, Case No. 9:09-mj-08308-LRJ | N/A | View |
| N/A | Alleged crime | Mr. Rodriguez's bribery and obstruction scheme. | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-19 | Court filing | Issuance of an ORDER regarding Government Exhibit 52 and the authentication by Employee-1. | null | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Transfer of item/document | Mr. Rodriguez gave something to Federal Agents. | N/A | View |
| 2004-11-28 | N/A | Police dispatch call regarding a suspicious vehicle at 358 El Brillo Way. The caller, Mr. Rodrigu... | 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020694.jpg
This document is a court docket log from the SDNY case against Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 19, 2021. It details orders by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding a motion in limine to exclude evidence from 'Accuser-3' (Witness-3), ultimately ruling that testimony regarding Maxwell introducing the witness to Epstein and facilitating sexualized massages is admissible as evidence of Mann Act counts. It also mentions a letter from the prosecution team and procedural orders regarding the sealing and redaction of documents.
DOJ-OGR-00020551.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket in Case 22-1426, dated July 8, 2022, detailing several filings from November 19, 2021, related to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The entries consist of letters and orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan concerning evidentiary matters, including the admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 and the anticipated testimony of a witness referred to as 'Accuser-3' and 'Witness-3'. The court orders address motions to exclude evidence and outline the process for redacting sensitive information, with a key focus on testimony about Maxwell's relationship with Mr. Epstein and her alleged role in facilitating sexual activity.
DOJ-OGR-00020450.jpg
This document is a log of court filings from November 19, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The entries detail orders and a memorandum opinion concerning evidentiary motions, specifically the admissibility of Government Exhibit 52 and the testimony of a witness referred to as 'Accuser-3' and 'Witness-3'. The court is ruling on what testimony from this witness regarding her relationship with Maxwell and Mr. Epstein will be permissible, setting deadlines for the parties to propose redactions to court documents.
DOJ-OGR-00005720.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is a portion of a court filing arguing that a piece of evidence, 'Putative Exhibit 52', is inadmissible. The author contends it is not a business record and cannot be authenticated. The document discredits the potential source, a 'Mr. Rodriguez', by stating he gave something to Federal Agents in 2009 and was previously convicted of extortion.
DOJ-OGR-00005719.jpg
This legal document argues that certain proffered documents cannot be authenticated as required by Federal Rules of Evidence. The filing suggests the documents, which surfaced in 2009, were likely manipulated or manufactured by Mr. Rodriguez, a former employee of Mr. Epstein, in an attempt to secure a $50,000 payment. The document asserts there is no evidence linking the creation or maintenance of these documents to Ms. Maxwell or any other credible source.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017949.jpg
This page from a legal filing details allegations against Alan Dershowitz regarding his presence at Jeffrey Epstein's residences. It cites testimony from Mr. Rodriguez and Maria Farmer claiming Dershowitz was present when young women and school-age girls were at the properties in Palm Beach and New York.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017509.jpg
A deposition transcript involving a witness (likely Scott Rothstein, based on context of Ponzi scheme and Ken Jenne association) being questioned by 'Tonja'. The witness admits to running a Ponzi scheme and discusses using the Epstein case flight manifest—containing 'big names'—as a tool to convince investors of the case's value. The witness also recalls conversations with Ken Jenne regarding a confidential informant in their office and confirms hiring a man named Wayne Black.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010574.jpg
This page from a legal document details statements by Alfredo Rodriguez, a household employee of Jeffrey Epstein, regarding underage girls visiting Epstein's mansion for "massages." It describes a journal Rodriguez took from Epstein's computer, dubbed "The Holy Grail," which listed names of alleged abuse victims and acquaintances, and mentions Rodriguez's subsequent criminal charge for attempting to sell this evidence.
Unspecified item/document
Mr. Rodriguez apparently gave something to Federal Agents in 2009.
Suspicious Vehicle
Report of a vehicle in driveway; caller unsure of type and saw no one inside. Later updated that the vehicle was expected company.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity