DOJ-OGR-00005720.jpg

380 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 380 KB
Summary

This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is a portion of a court filing arguing that a piece of evidence, 'Putative Exhibit 52', is inadmissible. The author contends it is not a business record and cannot be authenticated. The document discredits the potential source, a 'Mr. Rodriguez', by stating he gave something to Federal Agents in 2009 and was previously convicted of extortion.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Detective Recarey Detective
Mentioned as not having been given the 97-page exhibit.
Mr. Rodriguez
Allegedly gave something to Federal Agents in 2009, may have created the document in question, and was convicted of t...

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Federal Agents government agency
Received something from Mr. Rodriguez in 2009.

Timeline (2 events)

2009
Mr. Rodriguez gave something to Federal Agents.
Mr. Rodriguez was convicted of trying to extort money.

Relationships (1)

Mr. Rodriguez Interaction with law enforcement Federal Agents
The document states that 'Mr. Rodriguez apparently gave something to Federal Agents in 2009.'

Key Quotes (2)

"The Document is Not a Business Record"
Source
— Author of the document (Section heading arguing against the admissibility of evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00005720.jpg
Quote #1
"Mr. Rodriguez was convicted of trying to extort money"
Source
— Author of the document (Statement used to undermine the credibility of Mr. Rodriguez and the document he may have created.)
DOJ-OGR-00005720.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (691 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 390 Filed 10/29/21 Page 8 of 11
[REDACTED TEXT]
To be clear, the 97-page exhibit is not a document that was given to Detective Recarey.
II. The Document is Not a Business Record
In addition to there being no witness to authenticate the document it is clear that the pages of Putative Exhibit 52 were not a business record and there is no record custodian who can establish a foundation for the admission of the document under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6).
Mr. Rodriguez apparently gave something to Federal Agents in 2009. Someone, perhaps Mr. Rodriguez, created the document. Mr. Rodriguez was convicted of trying to extort money
4
DOJ-OGR-00005720

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document