United States Marshal
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Michael Thomas
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrea K. Johnstone
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Judge Andrea K. Johnstone orders the US Marshal to transport the defendant to the charging district. | District of New Hampshire | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Order for Transport | From District of New Hampsh... | View |
EFTA00027242.pdf
This document is an internal email thread from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated August 10, 2019, reacting to the news of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The chain begins with U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman informing colleagues at 8:24 AM that he received a call stating Epstein committed suicide and died on the way to the hospital. Subsequent emails discuss media strategy, whether to confirm the death to the press or wait for the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) or U.S. Marshals (USMS) to issue a statement, and share links to news reports from the NY Post and NY Times.
EFTA00024356.pdf
This document is a highly significant email thread from August 10, 2019, chronicling the immediate aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The correspondence involves the US Marshals Service (USMS), the US Attorney's Office (USAO), and the Bureau of Prisons (BOP)/MCC New York. The thread reveals significant confusion and frustration within the USAO, as officials complain that the BOP issued press releases about Epstein's death before providing basic facts to the prosecutors, leaving them unable to inform Epstein's defense counsel or family. The timeline moves from an initial report of an 'apparent suicide attempt' at 7:52 AM to confirmation that he 'passed away' by 8:46 AM.
EFTA00024354.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from August 10, 2019, documenting the immediate aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The correspondence reveals significant confusion and frustration within the U.S. Attorney's Office and among other officials, who were learning details about the suicide attempt and subsequent death from public press releases rather than official BOP channels. The emails trace the timeline from the initial report of transport to the hospital, to the confirmation that he had 'passed away,' and the subsequent scramble to notify his legal counsel and family.
EFTA00021833.pdf
This document is an automated 'Out of Office' email reply dated July 6, 2020. The subject line references Ghislaine Maxwell and her USMS prisoner number (02879-509), indicating the correspondence concerns her custody or legal proceedings shortly after her arrest. The sender (whose identity is redacted) advises they will return on July 7, 2020, and refers urgent matters to 'the institution'.
EFTA00015957.pdf
This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Bureau of Prisons/MDC officials regarding Ghislaine Maxwell shortly after her arrest in July 2020. Key topics include scheduling urgent legal calls for her defense counsel (Mr. Everdell) ahead of deadlines and her arraignment, establishing a standing 10:00 AM call schedule, and confirming her housing conditions (solitary cell and separate exercise) for court filings. BOP officials note that Maxwell was receiving significantly more legal access (2-hour afternoon calls plus morning calls) than typical inmates.
EFTA00015951.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 6-11, 2020, between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and prison officials (MDC) regarding Ghislaine Maxwell shortly after her arrest. The emails coordinate urgent legal calls between Maxwell and her defense counsel (specifically Mr. Everdell) ahead of court deadlines and her arraignment scheduled for July 14, 2020. There is discussion regarding a 'standing legal call' at 10:00 AM and adherence to EDNY/SDNY protocols for scheduling inmate calls.
DOJ-OGR-00001454.jpg
This legal document, page 14 of a court filing dated May 27, 2021, outlines the legal standards for reviewing a district court's detention order and for considering a defendant's temporary release. It cites U.S. statutes and several legal precedents, including United States v. Watkins and United States v. Scarborough, to establish that the court applies a 'deferential review' and that a defendant bears the burden of proving temporary release is necessary for their defense or for other compelling reasons.
DOJ-OGR-00001333.jpg
This legal document, page 16 of a filing dated April 12, 2021, outlines the legal standards for pretrial detention. It specifies the factors a court must consider when the government seeks detention for flight risk, as laid out in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g). The document also details the 'deferential review' standard for appealing a detention order and the conditions under which a judicial officer may permit temporary release of a detained individual.
DOJ-OGR-00001304.jpg
This document is page 14 of a court order filed on Feb 6, 2021, in Case 1:17-cr-02949-MV (United States v. Robertson). The Court is rejecting the government's proposed alternatives to release, specifically arguing that interview rooms with 'screens' at the Santa Fe courthouse or jail are inadequate for effective trial preparation because attorneys cannot sit next to the defendant, Mr. Robertson, to review documents. The Court also scolds the government for presenting these alternatives too late, noting they should have been raised before the unfavorable ruling.
DOJ-OGR-00020683.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY regarding the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically detailing orders from November 2021 leading up to her trial. Key issues addressed include the logistics of transporting Maxwell from the MDC to the courthouse, security concerns, delays in Maxwell receiving legal mail, and the schedule for juror selection and peremptory strikes. Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders requiring coordination with the US Marshals and MDC legal counsel to resolve these pre-trial issues.
DOJ-OGR-00020652.jpg
This document is a section of a court docket from the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from April 7, 2021, to April 16, 2021. It details procedural events including the rescheduling of an arraignment on a superseding indictment, the denial of a request regarding materials in courthouse cellblocks due to US Marshal policy, and a motion to continue the trial date. The document also includes judicial orders regarding redactions and the unsealing of specific legal memorandums.
DOJ-OGR-00020544.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for *United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell* (dated November 9, 2021). It contains orders from Judge Alison Nathan regarding the logistics of *voir dire* (jury selection), including the use of pseudonyms for witnesses, and schedules a sealed *in camera* hearing regarding Federal Rule of Evidence 412 (sexual behavior evidence). Additionally, it logs letters from the defense regarding bond release and from the prosecution regarding victim notification.
DOJ-OGR-00020541.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing filings and orders from early November 2021. It records joint letters regarding trial length and evidence motions, motions for reconsideration filed by the defense, and significant court orders regarding hearing schedules, witness testimony, defendant transportation, and access to legal mail.
DOJ-OGR-00020514.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from March 31, 2021, to April 14, 2021. It details procedural events including the scheduling and rescheduling of an arraignment on a Second Superseding Indictment, the granting of Pro Hac Vice status to attorney Sigrid McCawley, and various letter motions regarding MDC conditions and subpoenas. It also includes a specific denial by Judge Nathan regarding a request for Maxwell to possess materials in courthouse cellblocks, citing US Marshal policy.
DOJ-OGR-00020480.jpg
This document is a judgment in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2022. It details her sentence, committing her to the Federal Bureau of Prisons for a total of 240 months, with all counts to run concurrently. The court recommends her designation to FCI Danbury and consideration for the FIT program.
DOJ-OGR-00020443.jpg
This document contains a court docket log from November 9, 2021, related to the case of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426 on appeal). It details orders signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding jury selection (voir dire) questions, the use of pseudonyms for witnesses, and preparations for an in-person hearing on November 10 regarding Rule 412 (victim privacy evidence). It also notes correspondence from defense attorney Bobbi Sternheim regarding bond release and from prosecutors regarding victim notification.
DOJ-OGR-00020440.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426), covering entries from November 2 to November 4, 2021. It details pre-trial motions regarding trial length, juror anonymity, release on bond, and evidentiary hearings (Rule 412 and Daubert). Judge Alison J. Nathan issued orders scheduling a hearing for November 10, 2021, and directed the government to address issues regarding Maxwell's transportation and access to legal mail at the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020413.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between March 31, 2021, and April 14, 2021. Key events include the scheduling and rescheduling of an arraignment on a Second Superseding Indictment to April 23, 2021, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse. The document also details a denial by Judge Nathan of a defense request to allow Maxwell to possess materials in courthouse cellblocks, citing U.S. Marshal policy.
DOJ-OGR-00021939.jpg
This document is a federal court form (AO 199C) titled 'Advice of Penalties and Sanctions' filed on November 19, 2019, for defendant Michael Thomas (Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT). It outlines the legal consequences for violating release conditions or failing to appear. The document bears Michael Thomas's signature and a stamp indicating 'Defendant Released,' with an order for the U.S. Marshal to release him after processing.
DOJ-OGR-00021155.jpg
This document is page 3 of a Judgment in a Criminal Case for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 29, 2022. It details her total sentence of 240 months imprisonment to be served in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The court also makes a recommendation for her to be considered for designation to FCI Danbury and for enrollment in the FIT program.
DOJ-OGR-00025221.jpg
This document page outlines the psychological monitoring of Jeffrey Epstein at MCC New York between July 9 and August 1, 2019. It details his placement on and removal from both 'Psychological Observation' and 'Suicide Watch,' noting a discrepancy in records regarding his transfer to the SHU in late July. The report also describes USMS paperwork noting 'suicidal tendencies' following a July 31 court hearing, which led to a subsequent assessment where Epstein denied suicidal ideation.
DOJ-OGR-00025172.jpg
This document is an email chain from November 5, 2019, originating from a Supervisory Deputy U.S. Marshal in the Southern District of New York. The Marshal, on behalf of the Prisoner Operations Division, requests any reports from the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's death. The request is sent to Charisma Edge, who then forwards it to James Petrucci to determine if they can fulfill the request.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity