DOJ-OGR-00020652.jpg
1.19 MB
Extraction Summary
7
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court docket / case log (sdny cm/ecf)
File Size:
1.19 MB
Summary
This document is a section of a court docket from the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from April 7, 2021, to April 16, 2021. It details procedural events including the rescheduling of an arraignment on a superseding indictment, the denial of a request regarding materials in courthouse cellblocks due to US Marshal policy, and a motion to continue the trial date. The document also includes judicial orders regarding redactions and the unsealing of specific legal memorandums.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the court orders, letters, and motions; scheduled for arraignment.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Presiding judge; signed orders regarding arraignment, marshal policies, and redactions.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Counsel for Maxwell; author of letters to the judge and filer of motions.
|
| Maurene Comey | Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) |
Prosecutor; author of letter to the judge.
|
| Alison Moe | Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) |
Prosecutor; co-author of letter to the judge.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) |
Prosecutor; co-author of letter to the judge.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) |
Prosecutor; co-author of letter to the judge.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York (SDNY) |
Jurisdiction of the court.
|
|
| United States Marshal |
Law enforcement agency; denied request regarding items in cellblocks.
|
|
| MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center) |
Detention facility referenced in a letter regarding an update.
|
|
| USA (United States of America) |
Prosecution entity.
|
Timeline (2 events)
04/23/2021
Arraignment on S2 Superseding Indictment
Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 24B, New York, NY
Ghislaine Maxwell
Judge Alison J. Nathan
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 24B, New York, NY 10007.
|
|
|
General location subject to COVID-19 protocols.
|
Relationships (2)
Letters filed by Sternheim on behalf of Maxwell.
Judge Nathan issuing orders regarding Maxwell's arraignment and motions.
Key Quotes (3)
"The U.S. Marshall has a generally applicable policy that prohibits inmates being held in the Courthouse cellblocks from possessing any materials or items."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020652.jpg
Quote #1
"The Defendant continues to press for the redactions on pages 129134."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020652.jpg
Quote #2
"The arraignment is RE-SCHEDULED to occur on April 23, 2021 at 2:30 p.m."Source
DOJ-OGR-00020652.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (4,072 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page34 of 208
A-30
A-30
2/22/23, 1:25 PM
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
04/07/2021 197 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C.
Sternheim dated 04/07/2021 re: Response to Government MDC Update (Sternheim,
Bobbi) (Entered: 04/07/2021)
Sternheim dated 04/07/2021 re: Response to Government MDC Update (Sternheim,
Bobbi) (Entered: 04/07/2021)
04/08/2021 198 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Defendant's request to adjourn the arraignment on
the S2 Superseding Indictment is GRANTED. Dkt. No. 194. The arraignment is RE-
SCHEDULED to occur on April 23, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. It will take place at the Daniel
Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 24B, New York, NY 10007.
It is ORDERED that the parties ensure that all participants comply with the Southern
District of New Yorks COVID-19-related orders that govern entry into and behavior
within SDNY courthouses. These materials may be found at:
https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/covid-19-coronavirus. Court staff are working on the
logistical arrangements related to public access (including a public dial-in number), and
as soon as that information is available it will be provided in a public order. SO
ORDERED. (Arraignment set for 4/23/2021 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 24B, 500 Pearl
Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Alison J. Nathan) (Signed by Judge Alison J.
Nathan on 4/8/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/08/2021)
the S2 Superseding Indictment is GRANTED. Dkt. No. 194. The arraignment is RE-
SCHEDULED to occur on April 23, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. It will take place at the Daniel
Patrick Moynihan Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, Courtroom 24B, New York, NY 10007.
It is ORDERED that the parties ensure that all participants comply with the Southern
District of New Yorks COVID-19-related orders that govern entry into and behavior
within SDNY courthouses. These materials may be found at:
https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/covid-19-coronavirus. Court staff are working on the
logistical arrangements related to public access (including a public dial-in number), and
as soon as that information is available it will be provided in a public order. SO
ORDERED. (Arraignment set for 4/23/2021 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 24B, 500 Pearl
Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Alison J. Nathan) (Signed by Judge Alison J.
Nathan on 4/8/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 04/08/2021)
04/09/2021 199 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated
April 9, 2021 re: Response to Defense March 31, 2021 Letter Document filed by USA.
(Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 04/09/2021)
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated
April 9, 2021 re: Response to Defense March 31, 2021 Letter Document filed by USA.
(Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 04/09/2021)
04/14/2021 200 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C.
Sternheim dated 04/13/2021 re: Proposed Order to Marshal (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered:
04/14/2021)
Sternheim dated 04/13/2021 re: Proposed Order to Marshal (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered:
04/14/2021)
04/14/2021 201 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 200 LETTER by Ghislaine
Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 04/13/2021
re: Proposed Order to Marshal. ENDORSEMENT: After conferring with the District
Executive and the United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York, the Court
denies the request. The U.S. Marshall has a generally applicable policy that prohibits
inmates being held in the Courthouse cellblocks from possessing any materials or items.
The circumstances do not warrant an exception to that policy. SO ORDERED. (Signed by
Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/14/2021)(bw) (Entered: 04/14/2021)
Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C. Sternheim dated 04/13/2021
re: Proposed Order to Marshal. ENDORSEMENT: After conferring with the District
Executive and the United States Marshal for the Southern District of New York, the Court
denies the request. The U.S. Marshall has a generally applicable policy that prohibits
inmates being held in the Courthouse cellblocks from possessing any materials or items.
The circumstances do not warrant an exception to that policy. SO ORDERED. (Signed by
Judge Alison J. Nathan on 4/14/2021)(bw) (Entered: 04/14/2021)
04/15/2021 202 MOTION to Continue Trial Date. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Sternheim,
Bobbi) (Entered: 04/15/2021)
Bobbi) (Entered: 04/15/2021)
04/16/2021 203 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter
responding to the Court's March 29, 2021 Order. The parties agree that the redactions to
pages 118 and 119 are no longer necessary. The Defendant continues to press for the
redactions on pages 129134. However, for the reasons stated in the Court's March 29,
2021 Order, the information is already part of the public record in this case and
accordingly the proposed redactions are unnecessary and overbroad. Dkt. No. 189; see
also United States v. Nejad, No. 18-CR-224 (AJN), 2021 WL 681427, at *11 (S.D.N.Y.
Feb. 22, 2021). For the reasons stated in the Court's March 18, 2021 and March 29, 2021
Orders, the Court approves the limited redactions to Exhibit 11 to the Government's brief,
except for the language quoted in the Indictment, which is already part of the public
record. The Government is therefore ORDERED to docket its omnibus memorandum of
law, along with the corresponding exhibits, by 3:00 p.m. today, consistent with the
Court's orders regarding redactions. The parties are further ORDERED to docket their
April 1, 2021 joint letter; if either side believes that portions of that letter should be
redacted, they shall propose redactions by April 19, 2021. (Signed by Judge Alison J.
Nathan on 4/16/2021) (ap) (Entered: 04/16/2021)
responding to the Court's March 29, 2021 Order. The parties agree that the redactions to
pages 118 and 119 are no longer necessary. The Defendant continues to press for the
redactions on pages 129134. However, for the reasons stated in the Court's March 29,
2021 Order, the information is already part of the public record in this case and
accordingly the proposed redactions are unnecessary and overbroad. Dkt. No. 189; see
also United States v. Nejad, No. 18-CR-224 (AJN), 2021 WL 681427, at *11 (S.D.N.Y.
Feb. 22, 2021). For the reasons stated in the Court's March 18, 2021 and March 29, 2021
Orders, the Court approves the limited redactions to Exhibit 11 to the Government's brief,
except for the language quoted in the Indictment, which is already part of the public
record. The Government is therefore ORDERED to docket its omnibus memorandum of
law, along with the corresponding exhibits, by 3:00 p.m. today, consistent with the
Court's orders regarding redactions. The parties are further ORDERED to docket their
April 1, 2021 joint letter; if either side believes that portions of that letter should be
redacted, they shall propose redactions by April 19, 2021. (Signed by Judge Alison J.
Nathan on 4/16/2021) (ap) (Entered: 04/16/2021)
https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1 30/113
DOJ-OGR-00020652
DOJ-OGR-00020652
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document