An email chain from August 2008 between Alex Acosta and USAFLS staff discussing a letter from victims' attorney Brad Edwards. The emails reveal the prosecution's internal justification for not consulting victims before the plea deal, stating they did not believe the Crime Victims Rights Act applied and feared compromising them as witnesses. Acosta explicitly notes Epstein's argument that the victims were motivated by money.
This document is page 'iii' of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing dated April 24, 2020, in Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT (which corresponds to USA v. Parnas et al., though released in a DOJ OGR batch). It lists numerous legal precedents (case law citations) primarily from the Second Circuit and Southern District of New York, referencing cases such as U.S. v. Coppa, U.S. v. Ghailani, and others used to support legal arguments in the main brief.
This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article included in a House Oversight Committee production (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017727), bearing the name of attorney David Schoen. The text analyzes the legal definition of a "Victim" under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and proposes amending Rule 1 to align with the CVRA's broad definition. It cites various case laws (Hughey, Follet, Moore) and legislative acts (MVRA, VWPA) to support the rationale that the definition of a victim should be standardized and broadly interpreted.
This document is a page of legal headnotes from the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (349 F.Supp.2d 765), dated 2005. It outlines legal standards regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), jurisdiction, and the immunity of foreign officials, specifically mentioning the Director of Saudi Arabia's Department of General Intelligence. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a Congressional document production, potentially related to investigations into 9/11 or financial oversight, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named in the text of this specific page.
This document is a page from a legal analysis (likely a law journal article or brief) submitted to the House Oversight Committee, indicated by the Bates stamp. It discusses the legal definition of a 'target' of investigation by the DOJ and argues for a parallel definition for 'victims' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). Section B specifically applies this legal test to the Jeffrey Epstein case, stating as fact that he sexually abused over thirty minor girls between 2001 and 2007.
This page from a December 2017 Ackrell Capital report analyzes U.S. state laws regarding cannabis, categorizing them into medical, CBD/limited, and recreational frameworks. It notes that 47 out of 51 jurisdictions have enacted some form of cannabis law and discusses specific nuances in states like Florida, Delaware, and the District of Columbia.
This document is page 3 of a market report by Ackrell Capital regarding the U.S. state-legal cannabis market. It summarizes the conflict between federal prohibition and state legalization, categorizing state laws into medical, CBD/limited, and recreational use as of January 2018. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the U.S. House Oversight Committee.
This document is the cover and executive summary page of the '2018 Cannabis Investment Report' produced by Ackrell Capital, an investment bank based in San Francisco. It details global cannabis consumption statistics, the legal landscape in the U.S. and globally, and financial market estimates (predicting the legal market could exceed $100 billion). The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024631', indicating it was part of a document production for a House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document is page 105 of a 2017 financial report by Ackrell Capital regarding the U.S. State-Legal Cannabis Market. It estimates the 2017 market value at $8.0 billion, provides a pie chart breaking down revenue by state (California, Colorado, Washington, Oregon), and discusses recreational sales as a key driver for market expansion. The page bears the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024741', indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee.
This document page is part of a financial or investment analysis report detailing the growth strategies for KLC OpCo (Knowledge Learning Corporation) and k12 (virtual schooling). It highlights the consolidation of the Early Childhood Education (ECE) industry, the integration of KinderCare, and projected growth rates based on research from Harris Nesbitt dated September 2005. While part of the Epstein document cache, likely due to his financial ties to Apollo (which owned KLC), the document content is purely corporate strategy.
This document is an executive summary for Knowledge Universe Education L.P. (KUE), a Cayman Islands-based education company primarily owned by Michael Milken, Lowell Milken, and Steven Green. It outlines the company's structure, including subsidiaries KLC OpCo (education operations) and KLC PropCo (real estate), as well as its interest in k12 Inc. The summary highlights the principals' backgrounds and their investment philosophy based on human capital theory.
This document is an email sent from Nicholas Ribis to Jeffrey Epstein on February 28, 2019. The email's subject is 'DC attorney general subpoenas Trump's inaugural committee' and the body contains a link to a New York Post article on the same topic. The document is marked with the Bates number 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033567', indicating it was likely part of a congressional investigation.
This document is a page from the Federal Register dated August 30, 2011, detailing jurisdictional standards for the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and outlining employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). It specifies financial thresholds for various employer categories and lists legal rights for employees (e.g., forming a union) and illegal actions by employers and unions. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein; its content is strictly about U.S. labor law.
This document is page 230 of a larger report, likely from the House Oversight committee, and consists entirely of endnotes or citations. The citations reference news articles, government hearings, books, and legal filings from 2013 to 2017, all focused on the national security implications of the Edward Snowden leaks. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity