Neil
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Biggers
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | HELP USA 12th Annual Golf Tournament & Auction. | The Golf Club of Purchase, ... | View |
| 1972-01-01 | Legal case | Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 (1972) | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00005850.jpg
This document is page 67 of a legal filing (Document 397) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. The text outlines legal arguments regarding the admissibility of witness identification testimony, citing precedents such as *Neil v. Biggers* and *United States v. Simmons* to argue that even suggestive identification procedures do not require suppression if the identification is independently reliable based on the totality of circumstances. The page bears a Department of Justice footer stamp (DOJ-OGR-00005850).
DOJ-OGR-00005743.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically page 6 of 8 from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It outlines the legal standard for challenging the admissibility of identification testimony, citing several precedents like Raheem v. Kelly and Simmons v. United States. The text explains the two-part inquiry courts must use to determine if a pretrial identification procedure was unduly suggestive and, if so, whether the identification is still independently reliable based on factors established in Neil v. Biggers.
DOJ-OGR-00005742.jpg
This document is a legal argument from a court filing, dated October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The defense argues that a photographic identification of Ms. Maxwell conducted on June 23, 2021, was suggestive and tainted, and therefore should be suppressed by the Court. The argument cites several U.S. Supreme Court cases to support the claim that the procedure violated the defendant's right to due process.
DOJ-OGR-00005740.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists seven U.S. court cases, dating from 1967 to 2012, which are cited as legal precedent in the associated legal brief. The cases are from the U.S. Supreme Court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019466.jpg
This document appears to be an email or draft newsletter from Peggy (likely publicist Peggy Siegal) to Daisy. It details gossip and events surrounding an Oscar weekend (likely 2013), discussing films like 'Zero Dark Thirty' and 'Les Miserables', and mentions numerous celebrities and industry figures. The document concludes with a personal note expressing stress about scheduling and pressure.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016882.jpg
The text argues against the concept of technological determinism, asserting that political freedom is driven by norms and institutions rather than technology levels. The author uses historical examples to show that repression existed in low-tech eras and that modern high-tech societies often have high degrees of freedom, countering fears of an inevitable "surveillance state."
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018057.jpg
The document is a schedule page, likely from a larger itinerary, detailing events for Mercedes Benz Fashion Week (Spring 2011 collections) and a HELP USA charity golf tournament. It lists specific show times for designers such as Jenny Packham, Carolina Herrera, and Richard Chai, mostly located at Lincoln Center Plaza in New York. The document is stamped with a House Oversight footer, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015243.jpg
This document is a page from a House Oversight file (015243) containing an excerpt discussing conspiracy theories regarding mind control. It features a quote from 'Konformist editor Sterling' writing to 'Phillips' expressing skepticism about the book 'Trance Formation' and warning of a 'witch-hunt' mentality. The text also details extreme allegations made by author Brice Taylor in her 1999 book 'Thanks for the Memories,' involving high-profile figures such as Bob Hope, Henry Kissinger, Walt Disney, and the Kennedys.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029210.jpg
This document contains the email signature block of Ed Boyden (MIT Media Lab/Synthetic Neurobiology Group) followed by a legal disclaimer stating the communication is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey Epstein). The disclaimer instructs recipients to contact 'jeevacation@gmail.com' if the message was received in error. The document appears to be part of a larger email chain collected during a House Oversight investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity