Minor Victims
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
the defendant
|
Adversarial accused accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Litigation adversaries |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser exploiter |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser exploiter |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] (assistant)
|
Facilitator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged abuser victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged trafficker victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Assistant
|
Recruiters handlers |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Groomer victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Alleged perpetrator victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Alleged abuser enticer |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Alleged abuser |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Interactions between the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and minor victims. | Particular places (unspecif... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transporting minor victims to different locations. | Various locations | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse and grooming of minors | Epstein's residences | View |
| N/A | N/A | Childhood sexual abuse | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Discussion of a legal motion regarding the rules for cross-examination at an upcoming trial, spec... | Court | View |
| N/A | Alleged criminal conduct | The defendant allegedly engaged in a continuing course of conduct involving the enticement and tr... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Criminal trial | A criminal trial where four victims of childhood sexual abuse are set to testify. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexualized massages involving minor victims, often nude or partially nude. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse incidents where Maxwell was present and participated. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Trip | Epstein offered to pay for travel for some minor victims. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Trial involving sex crimes, including testimony from Minor Victims and presentation of exhibits. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Facilitation of crime | Ghislaine Maxwell facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's access to minor victims, knowing his sexual prefe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Criminal activity | Ghislaine Maxwell facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's access to minor victims, inducing, enticing, aidi... | New York Residence on the U... | View |
| N/A | Trial | The legal proceeding for which this pre-trial motion's table of contents is prepared. | The Court | View |
| N/A | Interaction | The defendant and Epstein knew and interacted with certain minor victims when those victims were ... | unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interactions between Defendant, Epstein, and minor victims | Particular places described... | View |
| N/A | Crime | A rape committed by Jeffrey Epstein against one of the Minor Victims. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse incidents where Maxwell was present/participating | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual molestation of minor girls on a daily basis. | West Palm Beach Mansion | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | Massages provided by minor victims to Epstein resulted in Epstein sexually abusing them. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Start of the conspiracy where Maxwell enticed and groomed minor girls. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Social outings to build trust, including going to movies and shopping. | Movies, Shopping locations | View |
| N/A | Sexual abuse | Maxwell encouraged minor victims to provide massages to Epstein, which resulted in Epstein sexual... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexualized massages | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Transporting minor victims | Epstein's planes | View |
DOJ-OGR-00003012.jpg
This page is from a government legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss. The Government argues that Maxwell's claims of prejudice due to pre-indictment delay and media publicity since 2011 are speculative and insufficient to warrant dismissal. A footnote details a discovery dispute where the defense is requesting names, birth dates of minor victims, and specific details of overt acts.
DOJ-OGR-00005860.jpg
This legal document is a court filing arguing against several defense motions. The prosecution contends that evidence of the defendant's lifestyle and close partnership with Jeffrey Epstein is relevant to the conspiracy charge and not prejudicial. The filing also argues that trial participants should not be precluded from using the terms "Victims" or "rape" when referring to the Minor Victims and acts committed by Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00002846.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 29, 2021. It outlines allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that between 1994 and 2004, she facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, sometimes participating in the abuse herself. The document lists four specific locations where victims were groomed and abused: Epstein's properties in New York, Palm Beach, and Santa Fe, as well as Maxwell's residence in London.
DOJ-OGR-00005592.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is part of a motion by the Government in a criminal case. The Government argues that the Court should prevent the defense from introducing certain evidence and arguments, such as the Minor Victims' consent or a separate Florida investigation, deeming them irrelevant and prejudicial. The Government requests that the defense be required to provide advance notice before raising these issues so their admissibility can be litigated outside the jury's presence.
DOJ-OGR-00005576.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed by the Government on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government asks the Court to establish the conditions under which it can introduce prior consistent statements from its witnesses, particularly if the defense attacks their credibility in opening statements or cross-examination. The motion cites Rule 801(d)(1)(B) of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the precedent set in United States v. Purcell to support its arguments.
DOJ-OGR-00005575.jpg
This legal document is a page from a government filing arguing in favor of a limited sealing request to protect the identities of minor victims. The government asserts that this request is minimally burdensome and legally sound, citing precedents where victim privacy outweighs public access, especially for evidence not yet shared in open court. It directly refutes the defense's claim that the request violates Second Circuit law by distinguishing the cases the defense relies upon.
DOJ-OGR-00005574.jpg
This legal document, part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, addresses the defense's arguments against a motion, asserting that the Government's actions are not merely tactical but aimed at protecting victims. It emphasizes the importance of privacy safeguards for Minor Victims, including the use of pseudonyms and the sealing of exhibits containing identifying information, while maintaining public and press access to the trial and most evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00005572.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is part of a court case where the Government is arguing against a defendant's motion. The Government contends that the defendant has not shown a 'particularized need' to publicly disclose the true names of the 'Minor Victims' during trial. The Government asserts that the defendant already knows the victims' identities and can conduct a thorough cross-examination without this public disclosure, which would protect the victims' privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00005571.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is part of a court case where the Government is arguing for the protection of 'Minor Victims' by allowing them to testify under pseudonyms. The Government asserts that this protection is necessary to prevent their identities from being exposed by news outlets, which would cause significant harm, and that the Defendant's need for witness information does not outweigh this need for protection. The document cites the Second Circuit's definition of a defendant's interests in witness disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00005570.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. The visible text outlines a proposal from the Government to protect the identities of 'Minor Victims' by not speaking their names in open court. The rationale is to prevent people in the gallery or those reading the transcript from disseminating the names online.
DOJ-OGR-00005561.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, argues that the defense in a federal criminal case is improperly relying on civil case law regarding pseudonyms for plaintiffs. It asserts that the current case involves crime victims, who are entitled to statutory protections under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, unlike civil plaintiffs who are generally required to identify themselves. The document criticizes the defense for ignoring relevant precedent from high-profile sex abuse trials and for citing irrelevant civil cases.
DOJ-OGR-00005557.jpg
This document is page 3 of 40 from a legal filing (Document 383) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 29, 2021. It is a Table of Contents listing arguments G through I, which focus on excluding evidence of victims' consent, addressing defense refusals regarding motions, and preventing the defense from mentioning previous civil litigation outcomes to the jury. The page bears a Department of Justice footer stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00005413.jpg
This document is page 20 of a legal filing (Doc 380) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. The Government argues for the admissibility of 'prior consistent statements' made by Minor Victims to other witnesses regarding sexual abuse by the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s. The text asserts these statements, made over a decade ago, refute potential defense claims of recent fabrication or improper influence.
DOJ-OGR-00005395.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal motion filed on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The motion, presumably from the prosecution, outlines a series of requests to the court to limit the defense's ability to introduce certain evidence and arguments during the upcoming trial. Key issues addressed include protecting witness identities, the admissibility of minor victims' statements, precluding discussion of prior investigations, and preventing arguments related to jury nullification or the defendant's status in a past civil case.
DOJ-OGR-00005863.jpg
This is a page from a Government legal filing (dated Oct 29, 2021) in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that witnesses, including expert Dr. Rocchio and the Minor Victims themselves, should be permitted to use the term 'victim' during testimony. Furthermore, it discloses that the Government expects testimony describing Jeffrey Epstein raping a minor, arguing this is directly relevant to the charges of trafficking and enticing minors.
DOJ-OGR-00005861.jpg
This legal document is a portion of the Government's response to a defense motion in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. The Government argues against the defendant's request to prohibit the use of the word 'victim' when referring to the 'Minor Victims' during the trial. The prosecution contends that using the term is part of its legitimate litigating position and not improper vouching for witness credibility, citing legal precedent from the Second Circuit to support its stance.
DOJ-OGR-00005830.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, argues for the admissibility of testimony from 'Minor Victim-3' and other victims as direct evidence in a conspiracy case. The prosecution contends this evidence, including overt acts detailed in the indictment, is probative of the defendant's intent and not inadmissible 'other-acts' evidence. The document cites legal precedents, such as United States v. James, to support the argument that acts like drug possession can be considered direct evidence of a conspiracy when charged as overt acts.
DOJ-OGR-00002845.jpg
This page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) details the grooming and abuse methods used by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how Maxwell normalized sexual abuse by discussing sexual topics and being present during sexual acts to put victims at ease. The document also outlines how Maxwell encouraged victims to perform sexualized massages on Epstein and how financial incentives (travel/education) were used to create dependency.
DOJ-OGR-00002844.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (likely an indictment) filed on March 29, 2021, detailing the factual background of charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines her intimate relationship with Jeffrey Epstein (1994-1997), her role as his paid property manager (1994-2004), and her specific methods of grooming minor victims by feigning friendship and asking about their personal lives. It also alleges she committed perjury in 2016 regarding these activities.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Minor Victims | $0.00 | Payments for travel and/or educational opportun... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Minor Victims | $0.00 | Paying for travel and/or educational opportunit... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Minor Victims | $0.00 | Offers of financial assistance encouraged by Ma... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Minor Victims | $0.00 | Payments for travel and/or educational opportun... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein /... | Minor Victims | $0.00 | Delivering cash after each massage and/or procu... | View |
| 2002-01-01 | Received | [REDACTED] (assis... | Minor Victims | $0.00 | Payment for massages after appointments. | View |
| 1994-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Minor Victims | $0.00 | Maxwell encouraged victims to accept offers of ... | View |
Sexual Topics
Discussing sexual topics to normalize abuse.
Grooming conversation
Asking victims about their lives, schools, and families.
Normalization of abuse
Discussing sexual topics to normalize abuse.
Experiences with the defendant and Epstein
Prior consistent statements about abuse, made well over a decade ago.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity