the media
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00017740.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Jane. The questioning focuses on events in 2019, establishing that Jane was contacted by the media and an Agent Amanda Young before Epstein's arrest. The transcript reveals Jane was initially uninterested in getting involved but later hired a new attorney, Mr. Glassman.
DOJ-OGR-00008519.jpg
This document is a page of jury instructions from a legal case filed on December 17, 2021. The text directs the jury on how to assess witness testimony, emphasizing that they should use their own common sense and experience, and are not required to accept unchallenged testimony. The judge also instructs the jury not to be influenced by the fact that some witnesses are using pseudonyms to protect their privacy from media attention.
DOJ-OGR-00001235.jpg
This is a page from a legal filing (likely a renewed bail application) for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated February 23, 2021. The defense argues that new bond conditions secure her assets to prevent flight, cites twelve pretrial motions filed by January 25 that challenge the government's case, and claims she has been unfairly demonized by the media as a 'substitute replacement' for Jeffrey Epstein. The document asserts Maxwell's determination to face her accusers at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00009055.jpg
This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was denied a fair trial because a juror, identified as Juror 50, failed to disclose his own claimed victim status during jury selection. This omission prevented the defense from exercising a peremptory challenge, and the juror later revealed his bias to the media by stating his memory was 'like a video' and that he would advocate for the alleged victims' credibility. The argument cites numerous New Jersey court precedents where judgments were invalidated for similar juror inaccuracies.
DOJ-OGR-00009052.jpg
This document is page 51 (internal page 44) of a legal filing (Document 613) dated February 24, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It argues that 'Juror No. 50' was dishonest during jury selection (voir dire) by failing to disclose that he was a victim of childhood sexual abuse and crime (referencing Questions 48 and 25). The text asserts that this nondisclosure prevented the defense from probing his ability to be impartial regarding Dr. Loftus's testimony and Maxwell's defense strategy concerning false memories.
DOJ-OGR-00019832.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Case 21-58) dated April 1, 2021, arguing on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text contends that Maxwell is being subjected to cruel punishment despite being innocent, asserting the government's evidence is weak hearsay and that she is being used as a 'scapegoat' due to the public outrage surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death in custody (referred to as the 'Epstein Effect').
DOJ-OGR-00013846.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) involving a dispute over the public release of Defense Exhibits J-8/9 and J-15. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues that the exhibits, admitted into evidence nine days prior, should be made public immediately without further delay from the government regarding redactions. The government attorney, Ms. Moe, notes she has been in contact with co-counsel Ms. Sternheim regarding the pending redaction issues.
DOJ-OGR-00005341.jpg
This document is a juror questionnaire from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. The form is designed to screen potential jurors by assessing their pre-existing knowledge, opinions, and potential biases regarding the case, Ghislaine Maxwell, and her associate Jeffrey Epstein. It also inquires about their media consumption and any prior discussions or involvement in surveys or focus groups related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00002734.jpg
Page 3 of a court filing (Document 160, Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on February 23, 2021, arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's release on bail. The defense argues that new asset restraints satisfy flight risk concerns and notes the submission of twelve pretrial motions challenging the government's case. The text strongly criticizes media coverage, claiming Maxwell is being demonized as a scapegoat for Jeffrey Epstein, but asserts her determination to face her accusers at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00011581.jpg
This page contains a transcript from a court proceeding, filed on July 22, 2022, appearing to be a victim impact statement. The speaker describes the trauma inflicted on their family, specifically detailing the abuse their sister, Maria, suffered at the hands of Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights how Maxwell used Maria to access the speaker, threatened Maria to silence her, and lied to the media to shut down investigations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity