| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Business associate |
69
Very Strong
|
65 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Legal representative |
14
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Business associate |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Professional |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Two Redacted Special Agents
|
Compliance coordinator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional collaborator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Friend |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Hugh Hurwitz
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Mentor student dynamic implied |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
|
Advisor security |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US Attorney
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Inmate
|
Communication |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
JEE
|
Correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Redacted Lieutenant
|
Friend |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Professional collaborative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Redacted Sender
|
Professional social |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney (Redacted)
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
USANYS Sender
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
SIGRID
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
USANYS Official
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted Lieutenant
|
Professional reporting |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe, Maurene Comey, and Lara Pomerantz (USA)
|
Professional cooperative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-29 | N/A | Court Appearance to testify | 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 906 | View |
| 2021-11-23 | N/A | Discussion regarding witness order for the upcoming trial (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). | Unknown | View |
| 2021-11-12 | N/A | Phone call between AUSA and recipient regarding witness travel | Unknown | View |
| 2021-10-19 | N/A | Internal SDNY discussion request regarding response to Defense Motion in Limine 4 (MIL 4) concern... | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-05-13 | N/A | Discussion regarding the pretrial schedule | Unknown (likely phone or em... | View |
| 2021-04-26 | N/A | Discussion regarding filing a Speedy Trial Act (STA) exclusion letter | Unknown | View |
| 2021-04-23 | N/A | Trip mentioned in email body | Unknown | View |
| 2021-03-25 | N/A | Read receipt generated for email concerning a call about Epstein | N/A | View |
| 2021-03-19 | N/A | Call re: Epstein FOIA | Teleconference / Call | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Accepted: Epstein/Maxwell FOIA | Unknown | View |
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Acceptance of a meeting or task related to Epstein/Maxwell FOIA | N/A | View |
| 2021-02-25 | N/A | Scheduled Grand Jury Appearance | United States Courthouse, 4... | View |
| 2021-02-17 | N/A | SDNY Assistant US Attorney requests specific document from SDFL Epstein file related to a CVRA la... | Email correspondence | View |
| 2020-12-12 | N/A | Proposed call to discuss 2019 Tax Return analysis | Phone call | View |
| 2020-11-03 | N/A | Phone call between sender and recipient referenced in the later email ('Per our call'). | N/A | View |
| 2020-10-23 | N/A | Request for a conference call/meeting to discuss papers regarding the Epstein case. | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-25 | N/A | Departure of an official involved in the handling of the Ghislaine Maxwell case/detention details. | New York | View |
| 2020-08-24 | N/A | Proposed Video Conference | Virtual | View |
| 2020-08-24 | N/A | Proposed Video Conference involving the Detective, the recipient, and potentially prosecutors. | Video Conference | View |
| 2020-08-24 | N/A | Proposed Video Conference with NYPD/FBI Task Force | Video Conference | View |
| 2020-08-10 | N/A | Phone conversation regarding oral surgery recovery | Phone | View |
| 2020-08-10 | N/A | Phone conversation between Detective and Recipient regarding oral surgery and case scheduling. | Phone | View |
| 2020-08-10 | N/A | Oral Surgery | Unknown | View |
| 2020-08-09 | N/A | Email correspondence following a phone call. | N/A | View |
| 2020-08-04 | N/A | Attempted physical handoff of thumb drive at office; drive left on bookshelf. | Office | View |
An email dated January 4, 2010, between legal professionals discussing the admissibility of evidence in a child pornography distribution case. The sender describes forensic findings of a virtual reality game titled 'Hizashi no nakano real' found on the defendant's computer and asks if this interactive content is admissible in court. The document is marked with ID EFTA00030972.
This document is a heavily redacted email header dated January 8, 2021. The sender appears to be affiliated with the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject line refers to '[Redacted] materials,' suggesting the transfer or discussion of evidence or documentation.
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Bobbi Sternheim, and BOP/MDC officials. Sternheim urgently requests that time-sensitive legal mail delivered to the MDC be given to Maxwell immediately for review over the Martin Luther King Day weekend. She also requests that Maxwell be granted access to a government-provided laptop because standard MDC computers cannot open the necessary discovery documents, arguing that denial of access hinders Maxwell's defense. The BOP recipient responds that the legal department does not process mail and that BOP policies must be followed.
An internal email from March 10, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The email discusses the classification of an attached document in the 'relativity' e-discovery system. The attachment is a Grand Jury subpoena from March 2, 2007. The sender is querying whether the document should remain marked as 'potential Brady' material (exculpatory evidence) or be switched to 'work product'.
This document is an internal email dated July 30, 2020, likely within the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The sender asks a colleague to verify if Victim Notification System (VNS) notifications were sent to a specific list of individuals regarding the Epstein case. The list of individuals is entirely redacted.
An email chain from July 2020 between a USANYS employee and another party regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. The correspondence involves a request to verify which individuals from a redacted list had received Victim Notification System (VNS) notifications.
This document is an email from March 10, 2020, sent by an official at the DOJ's Office of Professional Responsibility regarding the 'OPR Epstein investigation.' The sender requests a brief consultation with the recipient that afternoon. The names and contact details of the individuals involved are redacted.
This document is an email header dated May 15, 2020, originating from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The subject line 'Epstein-related Touhy request' indicates a formal legal request for information or testimony involving federal records or employees concerning the Jeffrey Epstein case. The sender and recipient identities are redacted.
This document is an email chain from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding a contract with CACI for document scanning services related to the 'US v. Maxwell Epstein' case. The correspondence reveals that the service was initiated in March 2021 but ultimately canceled in June/July 2021 because no boxes were ever sent to the vendor for processing. The contract specialist seeks to close the contract as there were no billable expenses.
This document is an email notification dated January 7, 2020, confirming the acceptance of a meeting titled 'FBI / SDNY Epstein update mtg'. The communication indicates ongoing coordination between the FBI and the Southern District of New York regarding the Epstein investigation months after his death. The identities of the individuals involved in the correspondence are redacted.
An email dated November 9, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding 'Epstein production.' The attorney is asking a colleague for a summary of materials provided to a redacted third party, noting that the third party claimed they were missing some items.
An email dated August 11, 2014, from a redacted sender to a redacted recipient. The sender discusses a productive meeting in NYC with an associate named Brad regarding abuse and trafficking cases. The sender specifically requests information or dates related to the 'Eppinger case' to help establish a timeline regarding when they were with 'him'.
This document is an internal email from a Paralegal Specialist at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated November 9, 2020. It confirms the readiness of the 'Sixth Production' of discovery materials for the defense in the 'US v. Maxwell' case, specifically mentioning the upload of iPhone data labeled 'NYC024318 1B71'. The email also discusses the creation of a specific index and drive for the MDC (Metropolitan Detention Center).
An email dated October 20, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to a redacted recipient (likely at the MDC). The email coordinates the delivery of a hard drive containing new discovery materials for Ghislaine Maxwell via FedEx and requests confirmation upon delivery to the defendant.
An internal USANYS email dated June 26, 2020, discussing draft press remarks for Ghislaine Maxwell. The sender attaches a document titled 'Ghislaine_Maxwell_Press_Remarks.ebd.docx' and notes that they have kept the remarks close to the language of the indictment, anticipating that 'Audrey' (likely Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss) would be conservative about making statements beyond the official charges.
An email chain between USANYS officials dated June 26, 2020, discussing the legal strategy for the Ghislaine Maxwell indictment. The prosecutors debate whether the current language is sufficient to prove the 'interstate travel component' of the charges and whether to include a specific (redacted) name in the indictment.
This document is an email dated June 15, 2020, from a Legal Assistant at the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. It conveys stamped and signed Non-Disclosure Orders (NDOs) and Pen Register orders (PENs) that had been submitted to the Magistrate Court. The recipient and specific details of the attachments are redacted.
This document is an email dated July 2, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to an FBI official. The email attaches a detention memorandum for the case 'United_States_v._Maxwell' (Case 20 Cr. 330 AJN) and notes that the prosecution will address the circumstances of the arrest orally during upcoming arguments.
This document is an email thread from July 2019 between Aimee Hector and a redacted prosecutor handling the Jeffrey Epstein case. Hector writes to inform the prosecutor that Judge Berman, who is assigned to the Epstein case, previously presided over the Cameron Douglas case, where the defendant violated strict house arrest conditions by smuggling drugs. The recipient thanks Hector for the 'data point' and notes they are currently overwhelmed by an 'avalanche of info' regarding the case.
An email dated June 14, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney at the Southern District of New York regarding the drafting of the Epstein Indictment. The sender discusses editing the document, specifically noting concerns about the 'level of detail' added and potential problems arising from it. The email includes an attachment titled '2019-06-14_Epstein_Indictment.agm.docx'.
This document is a 2019 email from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to an FBI agent sharing historical records from September 16, 2004. The records correlate three phone calls made earlier in the day with the arrival of Epstein's Boeing 727 at Palm Beach International Airport (PBIA) later that night at 10:16 PM, carrying Epstein and a redacted passenger.
This document is an email dated July 12, 2019, containing a draft attachment regarding a response to a bail release request for 'JE' (likely Jeffrey Epstein, recently arrested at that time). The body of the email simply states 'just in case . . .', suggesting a precautionary sharing of the legal draft.
This document is a printout of an email header dated July 1, 2019. The sender and recipient are redacted. The subject is 'latest' and it includes a significant attachment named '2019-07-01,_JE,_first_indictment.docx', suggesting correspondence regarding the legal indictment of Jeffrey Epstein ('JE') just prior to his arrest.
An email dated July 9, 2019, from the Commanding Officer of the NYPD Sex Offender Monitoring Unit to an unnamed recipient. The email confirms Jeffrey Epstein is a Level 3 sex offender in New York and outlines mandatory reporting requirements (every 90 days) and photo updates should he be released and reside in NYC.
An email dated June 20, 2019, from an individual at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding the 'Epstein investigation, prosecution memo'. The body text is almost entirely redacted except for a brief expression of thanks. This correspondence occurred shortly before Jeffrey Epstein's arrest in July 2019.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-21 | Received | FBI | Redacted Recipient | $0.00 | Reimbursement for purchased flight using attach... | View |
| 2019-06-06 | Received | jeeitunes@gmail.com | Redacted Recipient | $0.00 | Instruction: 'Don't send any moneyback until we... | View |
| 2019-03-30 | Received | e:jeeitunes@gmail... | Redacted Recipient | $0.00 | Offer to pay for a charter flight to Paris for ... | View |
Requesting a mailing address for Epstein's next of kin (brother) to send a draft condolence letter.
Subpoena issued to obtain evidence, which Maxwell argues was unlawful.
The document is the footer of an email. It contains links for subscription management ('why did I get this?', 'unsubscribe from this list', 'update subscription preferences') and the sender's mailing address. It also contains an error message for a missing image.
The document is the footer of an email. It contains links for subscription management ('why did I get this?', 'unsubscribe from this list', 'update subscription preferences') and the sender's mailing address. It also contains an error message for a missing image.
Sender attaches a draft Q&A for Paul Kane. Discusses legal strategy regarding the admissibility of records not created by 'PCS' but maintained by them, citing United States v. Kuthuru. Suggests chatting about another hearsay issue.
Request to create a binder for a court appearance on Monday containing attached legal documents.
Sending updated CC letter for review with items marked in yellow; requests phone chat.
Explanation of transport timing, clothing provision, and lack of utensils for Ghislaine Maxwell.
Forwarding the explanation regarding prisoner issues raised in court.
Discussing a 48-hour deadline set by Judge Nathan to file a reply brief regarding 'Omnibus Motions in Limine'. Specifically mentions needing a fact-check on statements regarding MV-4.
Request to schedule an evidence inspection with the defendant present at a proffer room, coordinating with Marshals and defense counsel flying in from out of state.
Request for a copy of all records released to the New York Times on their FOI request regarding Jeffrey Epstein's case.
Sender provides a draft cover letter (attachment: 2021.10.25_Maxwell_Cover_Letter_v1.docx) and instructs the recipient to 'Edit freely'.
Follow up regarding a telephone conference held by Judge Nathan, providing details about dial-in information for the defendant.
Reporter seeking comment on Ghislaine Maxwell seeking private screenings of potential jurors.
Forwarding original request for comment.
Request to discuss defense MIL 4 and how to respond, referencing an attachment '4._Motion_to_Exclude_Accuser-3_Evidence.pdf'. Sender notes the recipient briefed a similar issue previously.
Discussing an attached FBI 302 report from 2006 regarding a former employee's notes and work hours.
Command to appear and testify in the matter of US v. Ghislaine Maxwell on November 29, 2021.
Forwarding email chain regarding victim communications.
Email forwarding screenshots of text messages.
Requesting help reviewing a new batch of emails from the 'Epstein SW database' looking for 'hot docs'.
Requesting a transcript that was shown to a specific female subject during her first interview.
Attached, thanks!
Sender attaches a proposed joint letter seeking an extension of the deadline to file a letter regarding the pretrial schedule, referencing a discussion from the previous day.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity