| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Political donor |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Campaign donor recipient |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Campaign donor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Political donor recipient |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Social political |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-08-05 | N/A | Politicians began returning campaign donations from Jeffrey Epstein after he was charged with sol... | New York | View |
| 2006-08-05 | N/A | Politicians Eliot Spitzer and Mark Green returned campaign donations they had received from Jeffr... | N/A | View |
| 2006-08-05 | N/A | Eliot Spitzer returns campaign contributions. | New York | View |
This document is a series of emails from whistleblower Chris Dilorio to redacted recipients (likely SEC/DOJ officials) between April and May 2019. Dilorio alleges a vast conspiracy involving Apollo Global Management (Leon Black, Josh Harris), Jared Kushner, and Jeffrey Epstein, claiming that Apollo provided loans to Kushner in exchange for regulatory relief from the SEC. He also details allegations of money laundering involving shell companies like ESWW and DryShips, connects these entities to Russian interests, and reports receiving threatening phone calls in retaliation for his complaints.
An FBI FD-350 form archiving an August 5, 2006, Palm Beach Post article titled 'Expert: Ignorance of age isn't defense in sex cases.' The article quotes legal expert Bob Dekle stating that not knowing a victim's age is not a valid defense for sex crimes. It details that Palm Beach police found probable cause to charge Epstein with sex acts involving five underage girls and notes that NY politician Eliot Spitzer returned $50,000 in donations from Epstein.
This document is a book excerpt or narrative report describing Jeffrey Epstein's life in February 2005. It details his specific morning routine, diet, and clothing at his Intracoastal home, while the adjacent page outlines his reputation as a 'math' genius, investor, and philanthropist. The text mentions his connections to high-profile figures including Bill Gates, Eliot Spitzer, Bill Clinton, and Kevin Spacey, specifically noting flights on his Gulfstream jet.
This document, marked as House Oversight evidence, appears to be an excerpt from an article analyzing the use of sexual blackmail and incentives ('honey traps') in Iranian politics and statecraft. It details scandals involving Iranian officials Reza Zarei and Mohammad Ali Abtahi, and discusses how the Iranian regime uses 'temporary marriages' to influence Iraqi politicians. It also mentions a 2012 incident involving Iranian agents in Thailand. The text cuts off at the end of the page.
This document is a log of digital communications from March 12, 2019, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual. The conversation involves Epstein sharing a New York Times article concerning Donald Trump and Deutsche Bank, followed by a discussion of the 'Martin Act,' a New York anti-fraud law. Epstein pastes an excerpt (likely from Wikipedia given the citation brackets) explaining the Martin Act's use by Eliot Spitzer against Merrill Lynch.
This document, stamped with House Oversight identifiers, appears to be a printout of a news article detailing a lawsuit between Jeffrey Epstein and his former lawyers. It highlights allegations of orgies and sex trafficking involving minors at Little St. James and discusses Epstein's connections to high-profile figures, specifically noting Bill Clinton's flight history on Epstein's jet (2002-2005) and Prince Andrew's 2010 stay at Epstein's NY mansion. The text also references the 2005 investigation initiated by a mother in Palm Beach and mentions a specific victim identified as Jane Doe 102.
This document, part of a 2017 House Oversight filing, recounts the conflict between Palm Beach police and the State Attorney regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how police sought serious molestation charges, but State Attorney Barry Krischer presented lesser charges to a grand jury, leading to accusations of preferential treatment. The text also highlights Epstein's high-profile connections, including Bill Clinton and Alan Dershowitz, and financial ties to Harvard and politicians like Eliot Spitzer and Bill Richardson.
This 2006 New York Times article details the friction between the Palm Beach Police and the State Attorney's office regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. While police found probable cause for serious felonies including lewd molestation of minors, State Attorney Barry Krischer presented the case to a grand jury which resulted in a lesser indictment for soliciting prostitution. The article highlights accusations of preferential treatment due to Epstein's wealth and connections, noting his ties to Bill Clinton and Harvard.
This document, likely a page from a news article filed in House Oversight records, summarizes the conflict between Palm Beach police and the State Attorney regarding the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how Police Chief Reiter accused State Attorney Krischer of preferential treatment for Epstein. The text outlines Epstein's high-profile connections (Clinton, Harvard), his legal defense strategy led by Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz, and provides specific graphic details of the allegations made by a 14-year-old victim who was recruited by Haley Robson.
This document appears to be a news article or report summary detailing the 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach. It highlights the conflict between the police (who sought serious molestation charges) and the State Attorney (who pursued lesser solicitation charges), allegations of preferential treatment due to Epstein's wealth and connections, and the political fallout involving returned donations. It also outlines Epstein's defense strategy led by Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz.
This document is an email dated April 3, 2011, from Peter Green to a redacted recipient, forwarding a Daily Beast article by Alexandra Wolfe titled 'Jeffrey Epstein's Society Friends Close Ranks.' The article details how high-society figures like Wilbur Ross, Leon Black, and James Cayne continued to associate with Epstein after his conviction, while also highlighting allegations by Virginia Roberts that Ghislaine Maxwell recruited her for Epstein from Mar-a-Lago.
This New York Times article from September 3, 2006, details the sex crimes investigation into money manager Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, Florida. It outlines allegations from teenage girls, the police investigation, and the controversial decision by the state attorney to pursue a lesser charge of soliciting prostitution. The article highlights accusations of preferential treatment for the wealthy and connected Epstein, noting criticism from the police chief and the reputational fallout, including politicians returning his campaign donations.
This document is an FBI form containing an August 5, 2006, newspaper clipping from The Palm Beach Post. The article reports on the police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for sexual activity with minors, quoting a legal expert who states that ignorance of a minor's age is not a valid legal defense. The article also notes that political figures, including New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer, were returning campaign donations from Epstein following the charges.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Eliot Spitzer | $0.00 | Campaign contribution that was returned by Elio... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Eliot Spitzer | $0.00 | Campaign donations (returned). | View |
| N/A | Paid | Eliot Spitzer | Jeffrey Epstein | $0.00 | Returned campaign contributions. | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Eliot Spitzer | $0.00 | Campaign contributions (returned). | View |
| 2006-08-05 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Eliot Spitzer | $50,000.00 | Return of campaign contributions. | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity