Delaware

Location
Mentions
82
Relationships
1
Events
1
Documents
41

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
1 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Franks
Legal representative
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
1978-01-01 Legal case Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978) U.S. Supreme Court View

007.pdf

Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 9, 2023, granting Christine M. Mackintosh of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. admission pro hac vice to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund. The lawsuit names JPMorgan Chase & Co. as a nominal defendant and numerous individual defendants, including James Dimon and James E. Staley.

Court order (admission pro hac vice)
2025-12-26

006-01.pdf

This document is a legal declaration filed on June 6, 2023, by attorney Michael J. Barry of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. He is applying for admission pro hac vice (to practice in this specific case) in the Southern District of New York. The case (1:23-cv-03903) involves the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund as plaintiff against numerous JPMorgan Chase & Co. executives and board members, including James Dimon and James 'Jes' Staley, likely regarding a shareholder derivative suit related to the bank's ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal declaration (application for admission pro hac vice)
2025-12-26

005.pdf

This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on June 6, 2023, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney Christine M. Mackintosh of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. seeks permission to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund, in a lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its executives/board members (including James Dimon and James E. Staley). The motion confirms Mackintosh's good standing with the bars of Pennsylvania and Delaware.

Legal motion (motion for admission pro hac vice)
2025-12-26

005-02.pdf

This document contains two Certificates of Good Standing filed on June 6, 2023, as part of Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR. The certificates verify that attorney Christine Marie MacKintosh is an active member in good standing of the bars of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (admitted 2002) and the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware (admitted 2007).

Legal certificates (certificates of good standing)
2025-12-26

005-01.pdf

This document is a declaration filed on June 6, 2023, by attorney Christine M. Mackintosh of Grant & Eisenhofer P.A. seeking admission pro hac vice in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. The filing is part of a shareholder derivative lawsuit (Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR) brought by the Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund against JPMorgan Chase executives, including James Dimon and James E. Staley, regarding the bank's oversight.

Legal declaration (court filing)
2025-12-26

EFTA00038631.pdf

This document is a printed calendar invitation and email thread from March 24, 2025, organized by an FBI Special Agent from the Baltimore/Delaware Violent Crime Safe Streets Task Force. The meeting, held via Microsoft Teams, was convened to discuss locating 'Maxwell trial exhibits admitted under seal' within the FBI's internal 'Sentinel' file system.

Email / calendar invitation / fbi internal communication
2025-12-25

EFTA00038615.pdf

This document is a recent email dated February 25, 2025, from an FBI Special Agent in the Baltimore/Delaware Violent Crime Safe Streets Task Force. The email transmits an attachment titled '2021.11.16_US_v._Maxwell_Government_Exhibit_Index.pdf', which relates to the government exhibits in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.

Email
2025-12-25

EFTA00032556.pdf

This document is a 'Law360 New York' email newsletter dated June 27, 2019. It contains summaries of various legal news stories, court rulings, and industry updates involving major companies like Goldman Sachs, Bitfinex, and Fox Corp. The document appears to have been flagged in an Epstein-related search due to the mention of 'Epstein Drangel LLP' in the job listings section on the final page, which is likely an unrelated intellectual property law firm.

Email newsletter
2025-12-25

EFTA00029206.pdf

This document contains the Certificate of Incorporation for Hyperion Air, Inc., filed in Delaware in 1991, and subsequent banking documents from 2006. The banking documents include signature cards and applications for business deposit accounts with JPMorgan Private Bank, signed by Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Harry Beller as officers of the corporation. The documents establish account resolutions, authorized signers, and tax certifications for the corporate entity.

Corporate legal and banking documents
2025-12-25

EFTA00021202.pdf

This June 26, 2019 edition of The Daily 202 newsletter highlights Robert Mueller's upcoming congressional testimony regarding his report on Russian interference and potential obstruction of justice. It also covers significant national news including the humanitarian crisis at the US-Mexico border, tensions with Iran, the 2020 Democratic primary debates, and various political developments involving the Trump administration. The document provides analysis, key quotes, and links to further reading on these topics.

The daily 202 email newsletter from the washington post
2025-12-25

EFTA00017085.pdf

This document is a formal discovery letter from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) to the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated August 5, 2020. It lists a comprehensive index of evidence provided to the defense, including financial records from multiple banks (Citibank, Chase, TD Bank, etc.), travel records (flight manifests and airline records), email account records (Oath, Microsoft, Google), and corporate filings (USVI, Delaware). While the document *lists* the existence of flight manifests and financial records, it is an index only and does not contain the specific content (flight paths, transaction amounts) within the document itself.

Government discovery letter / disclosure index
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00002350.jpg

This document is a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists numerous legal cases from various U.S. courts, including District Courts, Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the Supreme Court, which are cited as legal precedent in the associated document. The cases span from 1972 to 2020 and cover a range of civil and criminal matters.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002350(1).jpg

This document is a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on February 4, 2021. It lists numerous court cases that are cited as legal precedent within the larger document. The cases span from 1972 to 2020 and involve various individuals and corporate entities.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002281.jpg

This document is page 'ii' (3 of 19) of a legal filing from January 25, 2021, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is a 'Table of Authorities' section listing various legal precedents (cases) cited in the main document, including United States v. Halper and United States v. Burke. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00002281'.

Legal filing (table of authorities)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002281(1).jpg

This document is a Table of Authorities page (Page 3 of 19) from a court filing dated January 25, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists twenty-one legal precedents (cases) cited in the brief, primarily from the Second Circuit and D.C. Circuit, covering dates from 1964 to 2011. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00002281.

Court filing (table of authorities)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00031226.jpg

This document is an FAA Registry record for the aircraft with tail number N908JE, accessed on January 3, 2006. The aircraft, a 1969 Boeing 727-31, is registered to a corporation named JEGE INC, located in Wilmington, Delaware. The record confirms the aircraft's registration status is valid, with its certificate issued on January 25, 2001.

Aircraft registration record
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00031224.jpg

This document is an FAA aircraft registration record for the tail number N909JE, retrieved via a public records request on January 3, 2006. The aircraft is a 1974 Gulfstream G1159B registered to Hyperion Air Inc., a corporation located in Wilmington, Delaware. The record includes details on the aircraft's specifications, manufacturer, engine type, and key certification dates.

Faa n-number inquiry results
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00031194.jpg

This document is an FAA aircraft registration record for the tail number N909JE, retrieved on January 3, 2006. It shows the aircraft is a 1974 Gulfstream G1159B owned by Hyperion Air Inc., a corporation based in Wilmington, Delaware. The current registration certificate was issued on March 15, 1994.

Aircraft registration record
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00010757.jpg

This legal document, filed on June 29, 2022, argues for the immediate unsealing of a defendant's motion for a new trial and related documents, such as juror questionnaires. The argument is based on the First Amendment right of public access to court proceedings, which is asserted to be particularly strong when allegations of juror misconduct are involved. The document contends that the public interest in transparency is significant, especially in a high-profile case, and that no sufficient justification for sealing the documents has been provided.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00003074.jpg

This legal document, page 140 of a court filing from April 16, 2021, outlines the legal standard for a defendant to obtain a "Franks hearing" to challenge the validity of an affidavit used for probable cause. It details the three-part test a defendant must meet, requiring a "substantial preliminary showing" of inaccuracies or omissions in the affidavit that were material and made with deliberate falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth. The document explains that a court must then determine the materiality of these errors by revising the affidavit to see if it still supports a finding of probable cause.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002941.jpg

This document is page 7 of 239 (internally numbered 'vi') from a legal filing, Document 204 in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It is a table of cases, listing legal precedents with their citations and the page numbers where they are referenced in the main document. The footer includes a Department of Justice document identifier, DOJ-OGR-00002941.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004853.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed July 2, 2021. It contains a legal argument citing *Commonwealth v. Tyson* and the Bill Cosby case to discuss the admissibility of Rule 404(b) evidence ('prior bad acts') to establish a common plan or scheme. The text details the legal reasoning for admitting evidence of a prior rape conviction in the *Tyson* case despite a twelve-year gap, using this as precedent to discuss Constand's allegations against Cosby.

Legal filing / court opinion excerpt
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005772.jpg

This document is page 7 of a legal filing (Document 395) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. The text presents legal arguments citing various case precedents to contend that the prosecution and the Court should not refer to accusers as 'victims' or 'minor victims.' The filing argues that such terminology improperly influences the jury, implies guilt before a verdict, and specifically prejudices the charge regarding whether Maxwell knew the accusers were underage.

Court filing / legal motion
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00005771.jpg

This legal document, page 6 of a court filing from October 29, 2021, argues against the government's use of the term "victim" to refer to accusers in a trial. It cites numerous legal precedents from various state and federal courts to support the position that such language is improper and prejudicial, especially when the commission of a crime is in dispute. The document concludes by emphasizing the special role of a prosecutor to act impartially and seek justice, rather than simply to secure a conviction.

Legal document
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016763.jpg

This document is page A23 of 46 from a financial disclosure report (OGE Form 278e) filed by Donald J. Trump. It details the ownership structures, holding companies, and percentages for various Trump entities, including Trump Drinks Israel, Trump National Doral, and Trump Ferry Point. The document appears to be part of a production to the House Oversight Committee (marked HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016763).

Government financial disclosure report (oge form 278e)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity