| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
HSA
|
Professional oversight |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
sheriff's office
|
Reporting |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
USAO
|
Recused |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
TOR
|
Assigned |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-01-01 | Recusal | The Department recused the USAO from all matters relating to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged sexual act... | N/A | View |
| 2010-01-01 | Government action | Department and Congressional actions were taken regarding the interpretation of the CVRA. | N/A | View |
| 2008-12-08 | N/A | Acosta's recusal formally approved by the Department. | N/A | View |
| 2008-11-26 | N/A | USAO advised Department of Justice about Acosta's recusal from Epstein-related matters due to pot... | N/A | View |
This document is an email thread from September 10, 2015, involving Jeffrey Epstein, Lawrence Krauss, and Noam Chomsky. The discussion centers on philosophy, specifically the dangers of religious versus secular fanaticism/dogma, with Chomsky providing a lengthy analysis. Notably, the top of the thread contains a message, likely from Epstein to Krauss, suggesting, 'you can invite depp to visit us when you are in the caribean,' implying a connection to actor Johnny Depp.
An email chain from September 2015 between physicist Lawrence Krauss and Jeffrey Epstein. The conversation begins with a discussion on religion and fanaticism but shifts to planning a trip to the Caribbean. Epstein suggests inviting actor Johnny Depp to join them, prompting Krauss to discuss his recent meeting with Depp, Depp's musical performance, and the fact that both Depp and Epstein own private islands.
This document is a page from a 2014 legal academic article discussing the application of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) to the Jeffrey Epstein case. It details the timeline of abuse from 2001-2007 involving over 30 minors and analyzes when victim rights would attach during the investigation phases by the Palm Beach Police and the FBI in 2006. The text argues that state investigations do not trigger federal CVRA protections and notes the transition from state to federal interest when the Palm Beach Police requested FBI assistance.
This document is page 85 of a legal analysis (likely a law review article) produced for the House Oversight Committee (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014064). It argues that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply before formal charges are filed, specifically criticizing the Office of Legal Counsel's (OLC) restrictive interpretation that rights only attach post-charging. The text cites the Attorney General Guidelines and legislative intent from Senator Kyl to support the view that victims are owed fairness and consultation during the plea negotiation phase, even before a case is brought.
This document is page 80 of a legal analysis (likely by Paul Cassell) included in House Oversight materials (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014059). It critiques an Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memorandum regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing against the OLC's position that victim rights only apply after formal charges are filed. The text outlines specific rights that logically apply pre-charging (protection, conferencing with government attorneys, and fairness/dignity) and cites case law (US v. Rubin) and legislative history to support a broader interpretation of the Act.
This document is an email chain from December 2017 between physicist Lawrence Krauss and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias Jeffrey E.). Krauss is seeking Epstein's advice on how to respond to an urgent inquiry from BuzzFeed News regarding allegations of sexual harassment. Epstein advises Krauss to provide a short cover letter and notes that the media's strategy is often to take the defense to the accusers and attack them.
This document is a draft email written by Lawrence Krauss on December 10, 2017, responding to a reporter or investigator regarding multiple allegations of sexual harassment. Krauss categorically denies the allegations, offering specific rebuttals to numbered 'items,' including a 2006 hotel encounter he claims was consensual and stopped politely, and a complaint by a former student at Case Western Reserve University which he claims was resolved informally with no finding of harassment. He argues that his high profile invites scrutiny but asserts his behavior has always been professional.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity