| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Krischer
|
Cooperation |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. VILLAFANA
|
Employee |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Inter agency professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's Victims
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein victims
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Oversight investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Inter agency |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jane Doe 1
|
Litigation victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Jurisdictional coordination conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Oosterbaan
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Federal Judges in the Southern District of Florida
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Official |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
OPR
|
Investigative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
state attorney
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's defense counsel
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
State Attorney's Office
|
Jurisdictional coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FAA
|
Cooperative limited |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Provision regarding USAO's efforts to obtain Epstein's computers and the safeguarding of these co... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation resolved through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Notification received by OPR from FBI and USAO regarding federal investigation and Epstein's plea. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations between Epstein's attorneys and the USAO, resulting in reduced prison time and other... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations for a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) where Epstein's legal team raised his financia... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Consideration of declaring Epstein in breach of the NPA, which could lead to litigation. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victims provided OPR with information regarding their contacts with the FBI and USAO. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | USAO investigation into Epstein, which ran for more than a year. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Federal investigation of Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sloman met with Dershowitz and informed him of USAO's opposition to early termination and transfe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial considerations for Epstein case, including victim trauma and evidentiary challenges | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña notified Black that USAO opposed transfer of supervision to U.S. Virgin Islands. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Drafting of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | USAO | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiations for a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) after initial 'term sheet' was presented. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) entered into by the United States Attorney's Office, Southern Dis... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | Investigation | Epstein investigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | Agreement signing | Signing of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) | N/A | View |
| N/A | Litigation | CVRA litigation | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal agreement | Signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Entering into the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Lefkowitz sent a follow-up letter to Acosta, expressing USAO's concern about Epstein intentionall... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal Investigation Resolution | Federal Jurisdiction | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation, execution, and implementation of the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing and negotiation of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | USAO | View |
This document contains a series of Deleted Page Information Sheets listing pages withheld from a FOIA release under various exemptions, followed by several FBI internal communications (Electronic Communications and Payment Request forms) concerning the case of Jeffrey Epstein (Case ID 31E-MM-108062). The memos track the opening of sub-files for subpoena and forfeiture matters, updates on forfeiture investigations involving properties in Palm Beach, and interactions with the US Attorney's Office, culminating in a request to close the forfeiture sub-file in 2008 due to state prosecution.
This document is a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) between the United States and Tova Noel, a Bureau of Prisons employee charged in connection with the events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. Noel admits to knowingly falsifying count and round slips at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on August 9 and 10, 2019. The agreement defers prosecution for six months pending her good behavior, 100 hours of community service, and cooperation with investigators (FBI, DOJ-OIG), after which the indictment will be dismissed if conditions are met.
This document is a Deferred Prosecution Agreement for Michael Thomas, a Bureau of Prisons employee charged in connection with the events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. Thomas admits to willfully falsifying count and round slips at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) on August 9 and 10, 2019. In exchange for this admission and compliance with conditions including 100 hours of community service and supervision, prosecution is deferred for six months, after which the indictment will be dismissed if successful.
This document is a legal response filed by Jeffrey Epstein's legal team on October 6, 2009, opposing a Motion to Compel discovery filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2. Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to refuse the production of photographs of his Palm Beach home (specifically massage rooms), financial records, tax returns, passport/travel records, and medical records from Dr. Stephan Alexander. The defense argues that despite the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), the threat of federal prosecution remains real and substantial, particularly in districts outside the Southern District of Florida, and that the act of producing these documents would be testimonial and incriminating.
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida, dated May 26, 2009, granting a motion to preserve evidence in multiple civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders Epstein and his associates to preserve a wide range of materials, specifically highlighting records of domestic and international travel (including private airplanes), phone communications, financial records, and evidence related to the October 25, 2005 police search of his Palm Beach mansion. The order explicitly prohibits the destruction, alteration, or deletion of potential evidence dating back to 1998.
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida dated May 26, 2009, granting a motion by Plaintiffs (Jane Doe No. 101 and 102) to preserve evidence in their cases against Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders Epstein to preserve a wide range of materials, specifically including flight logs ('travel in Defendant's private airplanes'), phone records, computer data since 1998, financial records regarding payments to victims, and evidence related to the October 25, 2005 police search of his Palm Beach mansion. The order explicitly forbids the destruction, deletion, or alteration of any such evidence.
This document is an email chain from October 2020 between FBI and USAO personnel coordinating the forensic review of image and video files from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The correspondence outlines the 'Epstein Image/Video File Review Protocol,' assigns specific device IDs (e.g., NYC024334, NYC024355) to reviewers, and sets a deadline for completion. It references attachments including search warrants and the Ghislaine Maxwell superseding indictment.
This document is an email chain from October 2020 detailing the forensic review protocol for digital devices seized in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The correspondence involves FBI and USAO teams coordinating the review of 10 specific devices (labeled with NYC prefixes) for images and video files, using a system referred to as CAIR. The most recent email confirms that two specific devices (NYC027908 and a Siemens image) were reviewed and found to be 'negative' for images and videos. The chain also references the Ghislaine Maxwell indictment.
This document is an email chain from October 2020 between FBI and USAO personnel regarding the forensic review of digital devices associated with Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence outlines a protocol for reviewing images and videos on ten specific devices (identified by NYC codes) using the CAIR system, with a deadline of the following Friday. It mentions the distribution of the Maxwell indictment, search warrants, and affidavits to the review team.
This document contains a chain of emails from October 2020 between FBI and USAO personnel regarding the forensic review of image and video files extracted from Jeffrey Epstein's electronic devices. The correspondence outlines a review protocol, assigns specific device IDs (e.g., NYC024363) to team members via the CAIR system, and references the Ghislaine Maxwell indictment. The most recent email confirms that the review of two specific Windows devices yielded negative results for images and videos.
This document is an email chain detailing the ongoing review of image and video files from Jeffrey Epstein's devices by FBI and USAO teams in October 2020. It outlines the review protocol, device assignments, and the need for reviewers to access case materials, including a warrant, affidavit, and the Maxwell indictment. The emails also coordinate calls and set a deadline for completing the review of ten assigned devices.
This document is an email chain from October 2020 between the FBI and the US Attorney's Office (USAO) coordinating the forensic review of image and video files from ten electronic devices seized in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The emails distribute review protocols, warrants, and the Ghislaine Maxwell indictment to the review team, assign specific device IDs (e.g., NYC024363, NYC024355) to investigators using the CAIR system, and set a deadline for completion. The communication reflects the post-indictment phase of the investigation involving Maxwell.
This document contains an email chain initiating from an MCC Supervisory Staff Attorney regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The primary content is a formal legal request from Epstein's attorney, Martin G. Weinberg, sent on August 11, 2019 (the day after Epstein's death), demanding the preservation of all evidence including video logs, physical evidence (ligatures, notes), and staff logs related to Epstein's death on August 10 and a prior suicide attempt on July 23. The chain also includes the initial notification of death sent by the MCC to Weinberg on August 10.
This document is an email chain initiated by a Supervisory Staff Attorney at the MCC on August 12, 2019. It forwards a detailed legal request from Jeffrey Epstein's family (dated August 11, 2019) demanding the preservation of all evidence—including video footage, logs, and medical records—related to Epstein's detention, his July 23 attempted suicide, and his death on August 10. The chain also includes the initial August 10 notification of Epstein's passing.
This document contains an email chain between the MCC Supervisory Staff Attorney and Martin G. Weinberg, the attorney for Jeffrey Epstein's family. The primary content is an August 11, 2019, request from Weinberg to the MCC demanding the preservation of all evidence (videos, logs, notes, medical records, etc.) related to Epstein's detention, attempted suicide on July 23, and death on August 10. The chain also includes the initial August 10 notification from the MCC to Weinberg confirming Epstein's death.
This document is an email dated August 13, 2019, sent by a Supervisory Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) to a USANYS official. The email discusses the 'incident this past weekend' (Epstein's death) and requests records regarding Epstein's prior incarceration in Florida to assist with ongoing investigations. The sender notes that the prosecution team has been 'walled off' from the current investigation.
This document is a Fact Witness Travel Request dated August 16, 2021, submitted by an AUSA to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It requests travel arrangements for two redacted witnesses to appear for trial preparation in New York from August 25-27, 2021. The request includes 'unusual expenses' to cover the travel of a witness's husband, mother, and three minor children, citing the witness's severe trauma and flashbacks resulting from childhood sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein, which necessitates family support for her wellbeing during testimony preparation.
This document is a Fact Witness Travel Request form dated August 31, 2021, submitted by an AUSA to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It requests travel arrangements for a redacted witness to travel to the Southern District of New York for trial or grand jury preparation scheduled for September 17, 2021. The witness is expected to arrive on September 16 and depart on September 17 or 18.
This document is an email dated November 12, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a colleague. The sender requests the preparation of a binder for an upcoming court appearance on the following Monday, attaching various legal documents related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, including motions regarding 'MV-3' (Minor Victim 3), expert witnesses Dietz and Loftus, and responses to the defense.
This document is an email chain from October 2021 in which Jeffrey Epstein's brother (acting as next of kin) requests specific evidence regarding Jeffrey's death from government officials. The brother requests the same information previously released to the New York Times, as well as video footage from outside the SHU on August 9, 2019, lists of inmates on the tier, and identities of staff present when the body was moved. Internal government emails discuss that the requested video is in the custody of the FBI and USAO after being seized from the BOP.
This document is a Public Corruption Unit status update from November 6, 2020, regarding US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details her indictment, arrest in New Hampshire, and detention conditions, while noting ongoing discovery work and collaboration with USAO-SDFL and West Palm Beach Police. The report highlights significant investigative steps, including the pursuit of an interview with Prince Andrew via MLAT after he declined a voluntary interview, and discussions regarding a felony disposition for a redacted individual.
An email thread from August 13, 2019 (three days after Epstein's death) discussing the logistics of interviewing victims. Attorney Colleen Mullen coordinates a meeting for a client with prosecutors in New York and requests travel arrangements. A responding official discusses the procedural difficulties of using government funds to bring witnesses to SDNY now that the indictment is no longer 'open' in the same pre-trial capacity, suggesting investigators may need to travel to the witnesses instead.
This document is an email thread between Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Eastern District of New York (EDNY) and the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated July 9, 2019. The EDNY attorney reports that a potential witness in the Epstein case called their office the previous day, refusing to speak to the FBI and specifically requesting the U.S. Attorney's Office. The matter and an attached memorandum of the call were referred to the SDNY for follow-up.
This document is an email chain dated November 22, 2021, between personnel at the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the preparation of a binder for legal proceedings. The emails discuss attaching various legal documents related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (case 20cr330), including responses to motions, limiting instructions from Judge Nathan, and Government Exhibit 52 (GX-52).
This document contains an email chain between the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) from July 2020. The correspondence details the volume of evidence collected by OPR during its investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, specifically citing approximately 516,000 emails obtained from 5 subjects and roughly 19,000 pages of scanned hard copy documents. The USANYS is requesting copies of these materials for use in ongoing litigation, prompting OPR to request a discussion regarding the legal implications of sharing internal investigation records.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity