This document is a subpoena from the US District Court for the Southern District of New York issued on July 7, 2021, to the New York State Department of Health. It commands the production of a birth certificate for a redacted individual in relation to the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The appearance date for the production of evidence was set for November 29, 2021.
This is a subpoena issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on July 13, 2021. It commands an unnamed (redacted) individual to appear on November 29, 2021, to testify in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The document is signed by US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Clerk of Court Ruby J. Krajick.
This document is a Grand Jury Subpoena issued on March 26, 2021, by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to the Interlochen Center for the Arts. It commands the production of student records for four specific individuals (whose names are redacted) in relation to an investigation into alleged violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2423(a) (transportation of minors) and 1591 (sex trafficking). The subpoena is signed by Assistant US Attorney Alison G. Moe.
This legal document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, filed and issued on December 2, 2024. The court, after hearing the appeal, affirms the June 29, 2022, judgment of conviction against Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
This document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on June 7, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the District Court's previous orders denying Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The mandate also notes that any concerns regarding Maxwell's sleeping conditions while incarcerated should be addressed to the District Court.
This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, and denies Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The order also notes that Maxwell's complaints about sleep deprivation while incarcerated should be addressed to the District Court.
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, to deny Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The order also notes that concerns raised by Maxwell's counsel regarding sleep deprivation during incarceration should be addressed to the District Court.
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, to deny Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The order also notes that Maxwell's complaints about sleep deprivation during incarceration should be directed to the District Court.
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the District Court's previous orders from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, and denies Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The order also notes that any requests regarding Maxwell's sleeping conditions while incarcerated should be directed to the District Court.
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 13, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order grants a motion by the appellee (United States of America) to file a supporting exhibit under seal. This exhibit is in opposition to the appellant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) motion for bail.
This document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated August 21, 2019, in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. The court officially orders the withdrawal of Epstein's appeal, based on a stipulation filed by both parties. The order was signed by Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, the Clerk of Court.
This document discusses a legal appeal by 'Maxwell' concerning the denial of her motion to modify a protective order and her request for a writ of mandamus to the District Court. The court declines to exercise jurisdiction and dismisses the appeal, also denying her request for a writ of mandamus and her motions to consolidate her criminal appeal with a civil appeal involving Guiffre v. Maxwell, citing lack of common identity between the appeals.
This document is page 13 of a legal indictment filed on November 19, 2019. It states that Epstein's death was ruled a suicide by the NYC Medical Examiner's Office. The main content is Count One of the indictment, which charges defendants Tova Noel and Michael Thomas with conspiracy in August 2019 to defraud the United States by impairing the functions of the MCC and making false statements to obstruct an investigation.
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated March 14, 2023, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No: 22-1426). The order, signed by Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, mandates that the Appellee, the United States of America, must file its brief on or before May 30, 2023.
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 28, 2020, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court grants the motion filed by the appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell, to file three specific legal documents under seal. The order was issued by Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.
This document is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 16, 2020. It addresses two separate appeals involving Ghislaine Maxwell: a civil case with Virginia Giuffre (20-2413) and a criminal case with the United States of America (20-3061). The order notes that on September 10, 2020, Maxwell filed a motion to consolidate the two appeals, and this document begins the court's ruling on that motion.
This document is an index of exhibits for a legal filing known as the 'Trzaskoma Declaration,' filed on February 24, 2022. The exhibits consist of various personal and legal records pertaining to Catherine M. Conrad, spanning from 1998 to 2011. These records include court case documents, a marriage certificate to Frank Rosa, property records like a deed and mortgage, and criminal history information.
This document is page 3 of a Second Circuit Court of Appeals order dated November 9, 2020, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell. The court dismisses Maxwell's appeal regarding a protective order due to lack of jurisdiction, denies her petition for a writ of mandamus, and denies her motion to consolidate her criminal appeal with the civil case *Guiffre v. Maxwell*. The court cites various precedents to establish that the protective order does not fall under the 'collateral order exception' and that Maxwell failed to prove exceptional circumstances.
This document is the first page of a Summary Order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated October 19, 2020, for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It identifies the presiding judges (Cabranes, Pooler, Raggi) and lists the legal counsel for both the appellee (United States), led by AUSA Lara Pomerantz, and the defendant-appellant (Ghislaine Maxwell), represented by Adam Mueller. The order was issued from the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse in New York City.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Farmer. The questioning focuses on a trip Farmer took to New Mexico, establishing that there is no journal, document, or any other form of record to confirm the details of the trip, including its date, purpose, participants, or what occurred.
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) dated April 6, 2012, which lists the publications of Stephen Gillers. The list includes books and articles he authored, co-edited, or contributed to between 1973 and 2011. The publications cover various legal topics, including the FBI, government secrecy, legal ethics, and law practice, and involve collaborations with several other editors and publishers.
This document is a table of contents for exhibits attached to a 'Trzaskoma Declaration' in a legal case. The exhibits primarily concern an individual named Catherine Conrad (also referred to as Catherine M. Conrad and Catherine Morgan Conrad) and include various legal and personal documents. These documents range from a 1998 criminal court disposition to a 2007 marriage certificate and a 2011 letter, suggesting a compilation of background information for a legal proceeding.
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically a curriculum vitae or list of professional activities for Stephen Gillers. It details his public service roles and activities on various legal committees, commissions, and bar associations from the late 1970s through the early 1990s. The document also lists his state and federal bar memberships, including admission to the New York bar in 1968 and the United States Supreme Court bar in 1972.
This document is a court transcript from June 15, 2021, in which a judge expresses profound frustration with the inhumane and mismanaged conditions at the MCC and MDC federal prisons in New York. The judge describes the facilities as being 'run by morons' and lurching from crisis to crisis, such as gun smuggling related to Jeffrey Epstein. While addressing an inmate, Ms. Days, the judge states that the conditions she endured were disgusting and inhuman, and wishes they could release her but is legally bound to a sentence of at least five years.
This document is a mandate from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, issued on June 7, 2021, regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, thereby denying Maxwell's appeal for bail pending trial. The mandate also notes that any concerns Maxwell has about being deprived of sleep while incarcerated should be addressed to the District Court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity