DOJ-OGR-00001425.jpg
583 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
5
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
583 KB
Summary
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 27, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The court affirms the lower District Court's decisions from December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, to deny Maxwell's requests for bail pending trial. The order also notes that concerns raised by Maxwell's counsel regarding sleep deprivation during incarceration should be addressed to the District Court.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant-Appellant |
The subject of the court order, appealing the denial of her requests for bail pending trial.
|
| PIERRE N. LEVAL | Circuit Judge |
Listed as one of the judges present for the court's term.
|
| RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR. | Circuit Judge |
Listed as one of the judges present for the court's term.
|
| RICHARD J. SULLIVAN | Circuit Judge |
Listed as one of the judges present for the court's term.
|
| Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe | Clerk of Court |
Signed the document on behalf of the court.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | Government agency |
The court that issued this order.
|
| United States of America | Government |
The Appellee in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| District Court | Government agency |
The lower court whose orders denying bail were appealed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
Timeline (5 events)
2020-12-28
The District Court entered an order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's request for bail pending trial.
District Court
2021-03-22
The District Court entered another order denying Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed request for bail pending trial.
District Court
2021-04-27
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held a term and issued an order.
Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse
2021-04-27
The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's orders and denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for bail.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
During oral argument, counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Ghislaine Maxwell's counsel
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held its term.
|
|
|
The address of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse.
|
|
|
The city where the courthouse is located.
|
Relationships (1)
Ghislaine Maxwell is the Defendant-Appellant and the United States of America is the Appellee in the case United States v. Maxwell.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,442 characters)
Case 21-21-cr-330-AJN Document 725-2 Filed 04/29/21 Page 2 of 4
21-58-cr (L), 21-770-cr
United States v. Maxwell
United States v. Maxwell
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 27th day of April, two thousand twenty-one.
PRESENT: PIERRE N. LEVAL,
RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR.,
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN,
Circuit Judges.
RAYMOND J. LOHIER, JR.,
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN,
Circuit Judges.
United States of America,
Appellee,
v.
Ghislaine Maxwell, AKA Sealed Defendant 1,
Defendant-Appellant.
21-58-cr (L)
21-770-cr
21-770-cr
Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell appeals from orders of the District Court entered December 28, 2020 and March 22, 2021, which denied her renewed requests for bail pending trial. See Dkts. 1, 20. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the District Court’s orders are AFFIRMED and that Appellant’s motion for bail, or in the alternative, temporary pretrial release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), Dkt. 39, is DENIED. During oral argument, counsel for Appellant expressed concern that Appellant was improperly being deprived of sleep while incarcerated. To the extent Appellant seeks relief specific to her sleeping conditions, such request should be addressed to the District Court.
FOR THE COURT:
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
[Signature of Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe]
EXHIBIT A
DOJ-OGR-00001425
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document