James R. Marsh
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Client
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Unknown Sender
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-24 | N/A | Execution of legal agreement/retainer between Marsh Law Firm PLLC and a client | Digital/Online | View |
EFTA00037137.pdf
This document is a screenshot of a digital signature page (page 8/9) for a legal agreement involving Marsh Law Firm PLLC, dated March 24, 2024. It displays a signature by Founding Partner James R. Marsh and a pending signature field for a client. The document includes a Bates stamp 'EFTA00037137' and appears to be a retainer or service agreement viewed on a mobile device via Adobe Sign.
EFTA00037124.pdf
This document is a screenshot of an email exchange from January 12, 2024, involving attorney James R. Marsh of Marsh Law Firm PLLC. An unidentified individual complains about being denied legal representation and freedom of speech, invoking 'article 51' and criticizing their treatment. Marsh responds by suggesting the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) as a resource.
EFTA00037109.pdf
This document is a legal objection to a proposed $290 million class action settlement in the case of Jane Doe 1 v. Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan Chase. Filed by the Marsh Law Firm on behalf of an anonymous Epstein survivor, the objection argues that the settlement amount is inadequate, the allocation plan is arbitrary, and the requested attorney fees (30%) are excessive. The filing also alleges potential conflicts of interest regarding Class Counsel's prior relationships with Epstein associates and requests that the Objector be allowed to appear virtually at the fairness hearing.
EFTA00037090.pdf
This document is a mobile screenshot of an email thread containing a digital receipt for a wire transfer dated January 18, 2024. Attorney James R. Marsh of Marsh Law Firm PLLC sent a 'Test Wire' of $1.36 to a redacted recipient to prove payment ('POP'), asserting he 'was not tying' (lying) about sending it. The document bears the Bates stamp EFTA00037090.
EFTA00015345.pdf
This document is an email from attorney Robert Y. Lewis of The Marsh Law Firm to prosecutors (including a Mr. Pecorino) regarding the upcoming trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (USA v. Maxwell). Lewis requests information on admission protocols for his client, a redacted victim of Epstein and Maxwell who previously gave a victim impact statement in 2019, to attend the trial scheduled for November 29, 2021.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016541.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the complexities of prosecutorial discretion, federal versus state enforcement redundancy, and political accountability in the context of police violence and other crimes. It highlights the 'executive separation of powers' model and the limitations of democratic accountability for elected state prosecutors. The page also contains numerous footnotes citing legal precedents, government reports, and academic works related to the Department of Justice and civil rights enforcement.
James where is POP
Sender provided a screenshot of a completed wire transfer for $1.36 as 'PROOF OF PAYMENT' (POP). The sender notes it was a 'Test Wire' sent that morning and states 'I was not tying' (likely typo for 'lying').
Re: Legal Representation
Recommendation of the ECCHR as a relevant organization for the sender's concerns.
Application to appear virtually
Request to appear virtually and be heard orally at the Settlement Hearing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity