Maryland
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Brady
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1963-01-01 | Legal case | Legal case: Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
019-01.pdf
This document is an affidavit filed on June 30, 2023, by John McNichols, a partner at Williams & Connolly LLP, supporting his motion to appear pro hac vice in the case of Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. James Dimon, et al. The case involves JPMorgan Chase & Co. as a nominal defendant and lists numerous individual defendants including James Dimon and James E. Staley. McNichols attests to his good standing with the bars of Maryland, Virginia, and D.C., and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
EFTA00032942.pdf
This document is a 'White Collar Law360' email newsletter dated February 13, 2020. It summarizes various legal news stories, including the Roger Stone sentencing, fraud cases involving Theranos and Air Charter Co., and investigations into university funding. A specific article highlights a defamation dispute between attorneys David Boies and Alan Dershowitz, centering on Boies' remarks regarding Dershowitz's alleged connections to Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00032906.pdf
This document is an 'Access to Justice' email newsletter from Law360 dated April 20, 2020. It aggregates various legal news stories, primarily focused on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the justice system, including court closures, remote hearings, and bankruptcy issues. It is relevant to the Epstein files because it contains a summary of a recent Eleventh Circuit ruling that the Crime Victims' Rights Act protections do not arise until after a formal criminal charge is filed, which is described as a blow to Epstein's victims.
EFTA00032738.pdf
This document is a Law360 email newsletter from June 17, 2021, summarizing various legal news stories in New York. A key item reports that Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys complained to a judge about prison conditions, specifically alleging that feces rained down in her cell and guards listened to privileged conversations. Other stories cover Greenberg Traurig lobbying for a bill aiding a Russian oligarch, various financial settlements, and legal industry news.
EFTA00023435.pdf
This document is a letter dated December 16, 2019, from the Federal Bureau of Prisons to Danielle Ivory of The New York Times regarding FOIA Request 2020-01336. The BOP acknowledges the request for records concerning Jeffrey Epstein's prison stay and death but denies the request for expedited processing, citing insufficient urgency, and assigns the request to the 'complex' track due to the volume of records and need for field office searches.
EFTA00023433.pdf
This document is a formal response from the Federal Bureau of Prisons to Danielle Ivory of The New York Times regarding FOIA Request 2020-01336. The BOP informs Ivory that her request from January 2, 2020, is being aggregated with a prior request from December 12, 2019, to comply with regulations regarding fee avoidance. Additionally, the BOP denies her request for expedited processing, citing insufficient evidence of urgency to inform the public.
EFTA00023431.pdf
A letter from the Federal Bureau of Prisons to New York Times reporter Danielle Ivory denying a FOIA request for documents regarding inmate Jeffrey Epstein. The BOP withheld all records citing multiple exemptions, specifically noting exemption (b)(7)(A) due to active and on-going law enforcement proceedings.
EFTA00021202.pdf
This June 26, 2019 edition of The Daily 202 newsletter highlights Robert Mueller's upcoming congressional testimony regarding his report on Russian interference and potential obstruction of justice. It also covers significant national news including the humanitarian crisis at the US-Mexico border, tensions with Iran, the 2020 Democratic primary debates, and various political developments involving the Trump administration. The document provides analysis, key quotes, and links to further reading on these topics.
EFTA00013549.pdf
This email from a prosecutor (implied by the West Palm Beach address and context) updates a colleague on the Epstein case. It details a grand jury presentation where a juror expressed relief that the case wasn't being 'whitewashed,' mentions Epstein's lawyers harassing victims via civil suits, reports a victim's recent suicide attempt, and expresses frustration with delays while victims suffer.
DOJ-OGR-00022074.jpg
This document is a legal argument from a court filing dated April 24, 2020. It outlines the Government's legal obligation under the Due Process Clause, as established by the landmark cases Brady v. Maryland and Giglio v. United States, to disclose material exculpatory and impeachment evidence to the defense. The text defines what constitutes "material" evidence and discusses legal precedents that clarify the scope and limitations of this disclosure requirement.
DOJ-OGR-00022065.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on April 24, 2020. It lists numerous legal cases that are cited as precedent within the main document, along with the page numbers where they are referenced. The cases span from 1963 to 2020 and involve various parties, including individuals, non-profit organizations, and multiple U.S. government agencies, across different federal court jurisdictions.
DOJ-OGR-00022041.jpg
This legal document, a court filing from April 9, 2020, argues that the government must produce all relevant and exculpatory evidence to the defendant, Mr. Thomas, for trial preparation. Citing the Brady doctrine and cases like United States v. Bagley, it asserts that the government has an affirmative duty to disclose evidence favorable to the defendant, including information that can impeach prosecution witnesses, and that the court should compel this discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00022026.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on April 9, 2020. It lists numerous court cases used as legal precedent, with the majority being criminal cases where the 'United States' is a party against various individuals. The cases cited span from 1963 to 2007 and originate from various federal courts across the country.
DOJ-OGR-00021481.jpg
This document is a page from a Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report regarding the conduct of prosecutor Villafaña in the Jeffrey Epstein case. It concludes that Villafaña did not violate professional conduct rules by failing to inform victims' attorney (Edwards) of the full Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) prior to the state plea hearing, noting she was following management directives from U.S. Attorney Acosta to delay notification. The report discusses the tension between victim notification and the risk of creating impeachment evidence, and references a complaint by Epstein's lawyer, Ken Starr, regarding victim contact.
DOJ-OGR-00021460.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a DOJ OPR report analyzing whether federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) or Victims' Rights and Restitution Act (VRRA) during the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It discusses the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) on September 24, 2007, and notes a conflict between prosecutor Villafaña, who recalled suggesting victim consultation, and her supervisors (Acosta, Sloman, Menchel, Lourie) who did not recall such discussions. The report concludes that while the VRRA may have been violated, there was no conclusive evidence that the lack of consultation was an intentional effort to silence victims.
DOJ-OGR-00021459.jpg
This legal document analyzes the ambiguity of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) concerning when victims' rights attach, particularly before formal charges are filed. It notes that at the time of the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in the Epstein case, court precedent was sparse and divided, a situation that continued as of the writing of this report. Because the law was not clear, the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) concluded that the prosecutors' failure to consult with victims before signing the NPA did not constitute professional misconduct.
DOJ-OGR-00003044.jpg
This legal document page outlines the Fourth Amendment's third-party doctrine, which generally holds that individuals have no reasonable expectation of privacy in information voluntarily shared with third parties. It cites key Supreme Court cases like Miller and Smith to support this doctrine, while also discussing the narrow exception for cell site location information established in the Carpenter case. The document concludes by emphasizing that a defendant bears the burden of proving, through sworn evidence, that their own rights were violated to have standing to challenge a search.
DOJ-OGR-00002944.jpg
This document is page 10 (labeled 'ix') of a Table of Authorities from a legal filing dated April 16, 2021, in the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It lists legal precedents beginning with 'S' through 'U', including citations for *United States v. Nader* (marked 'passim', meaning cited frequently) and various Second Circuit decisions. The footer indicates this document was processed by the DOJ Office of Government Relations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019797.jpg
This document is page 309 from a book containing endnotes for Chapter 3 ('Contractor'). Based on the footer ISBN (9780451494566) and filename 'Epst_', the book is 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein. The content details sources for information regarding Edward Snowden's employment (Dell, Booz Allen), his time in Japan and India, his relationship with Lindsay Mills, and interviews with intelligence officials. While the filename includes 'Epst' (referring to author Edward Jay Epstein) and 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT', the content is strictly about Edward Snowden and intelligence leaks, not Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019734.jpg
This document is page 246 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein), stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. The text details the aftermath of the Edward Snowden intelligence breach in 2013, describing it as a massive strategic setback for Western intelligence agencies (NSA, CIA, GCHQ). It discusses the strategic implications of the leak regarding Russia and China, and describes the massive damage control efforts undertaken by U.S. and British intelligence officers in Washington, Fort Meade, and Cheltenham.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019694.jpg
This document appears to be page 206 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the file name 'Epst_' and the book title header). It discusses the NSA's operations at Fort Meade, the impact of the Edward Snowden leaks, and the agency's specific capability developed in 2007 to intercept internet traffic before encryption. It also details internal NSA security protocols, including the use of 'compartments' and the 'NSANet' to manage classified information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019687.jpg
This document is a page (p. 199) from a book, likely titled 'Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales' (based on the filename ISBN), which was included in a House Oversight Committee document production (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019687). The text provides a historical overview of the rise of the National Security Agency (NSA), detailing its origins in WWII cryptography (breaking Enigma and Purple ciphers), its formal establishment by President Truman in 1952, and its dual mission of protecting US communications while intercepting foreign intelligence during the Cold War. The footer indicates the file was processed or printed on September 30, 2016.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019678.jpg
This document is page 190 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein), stamped with a House Oversight Committee label. It details a 2010 NSA counterespionage probe at Fort Meade aimed at identifying Russian spies and the June 2010 FBI arrest and deportation of twelve Russian sleeper agents identified by an individual named Poteyev. The text discusses the logistical challenges of internal NSA investigations and the strategic implications of deporting the agents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019623.jpg
This document appears to be page 135 from a book proof (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, given the ISBN and filename) included in a House Oversight Committee production. The text details the timeline of the NSA discovering Edward Snowden's theft of documents in 2013, the involvement of General Alexander and Booz Allen Hamilton, and the initiation of the damage assessment investigation led by Rick Ledgett. It tracks Snowden's movements from Hawaii to Hong Kong and the internal communications regarding his unauthorized absence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019566.jpg
This document is page 78 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein. It details Edward Snowden's activities in April 2013, including his correspondence with NSA legal counsel regarding the precedence of Congressional acts, his completion of orientation at Fort Meade, his return to Hawaii to move houses with Mills, and his request for medical leave from Booz Allen as a pretext for his exit. The document appears to be part of a House Oversight production (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019566), likely included due to the author's name (Edward Jay Epstein) rather than a direct link to Jeffrey Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity