Robbie Kaplan
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Professional interaction |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Client]
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | N/A | Status conference for the civil case suing Epstein/estate. | Court | View |
| 2020-01-10 | N/A | Status conference for the case involving Robbie Kaplan's client. | Unknown (likely court) | View |
| 2020-01-10 | N/A | Status conference for case involving Robbie Kaplan | Unknown (Court) | View |
| 2020-01-10 | N/A | Status conference for the case involving Robbie Kaplan/Kaplan Hecker. | Court (implied) | View |
EFTA00031090.pdf
This document is an email chain between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated December 30-31, 2019. The discussion concerns establishing a protocol for handling document requests from plaintiffs suing the Epstein estate, specifically referencing a request from attorney Robbie Kaplan. The officials discuss implementing 'Touhy Requests' and designating a Civil Division point person to manage these inquiries ahead of a January 10 status conference.
EFTA00031089.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated December 30-31, 2019. The discussion concerns procedural protocols ('Touhy Requests') for handling requests for information from lawyers representing plaintiffs suing Jeffrey Epstein and his estate. Specifically, it mentions a request from attorney Robbie Kaplan of the firm Kaplan Hecker and the need to establish a system for handling such requests before an upcoming status conference on January 10.
EFTA00031088.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York discussing procedures for handling document requests from plaintiffs suing Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The sender proposes using 'Touhy Requests' and specifically mentions a current, narrow request from attorney Robbie Kaplan of Kaplan Hecker, noting an upcoming status conference on January 10.
EFTA00022144.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 30-31, 2019, between Assistant U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of New York. They discuss establishing a protocol (specifically Touhy Requests) for handling document requests from civil plaintiffs suing Jeffrey Epstein and his estate. The emails specifically mention a narrow request from attorney Robbie Kaplan and reference a status conference scheduled for January 10, 2020.
EFTA00017905.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 30, 2019, between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG). The correspondence concerns an appeal filed in the 11th Circuit regarding the Epstein CVRA case, specifically addressing allegations that victims were unable to attend the SDNY hearing due to insufficient notice. The emails detail that 39 victim notices were sent via VNS, 17 victims attended the hearing personally, and 7 had statements read in their absence; one specific anecdote describes a victim who missed two arranged flights and failed to attend.
EFTA00015003.pdf
This document is an email chain from March 24, 2019, between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), specifically involving the Deputy Chief of the Public Corruption Unit. The emails discuss the progress of the Epstein investigation, detailing a recent trip to Fort Lauderdale where investigators interviewed two witnesses at the BSF (Boies Schiller Flexner) office, while a third witness declined to appear. The correspondence also mentions ongoing negotiations with attorney Robbie Kaplan regarding a potential interview with a high-profile individual (name redacted) who is concerned about their legal 'exposure,' with discussions moving toward an attorney proffer.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity