["Your Honor"]
PersonRelationship Network
Argument for an above-guideline sentence
The speaker, representing the government, argues that the Court should impose a sentence greater than the 188 to 235-month guideline. The justification is the defendant's dishonesty, the severity and scope of her sex-trafficking crimes, and the inadequacy of the 2003 sentencing guidelines, which the Supreme Court has allowed courts to exceed.
Impeachment of witness Juan Alessi
Mr. Rohrbach argues against the impeachment, stating that the details of the prior burglary are a collateral matter and not central to the current trial.
Impeachment of witness Juan Alessi
Mr. Everdell argues that they should be allowed to impeach Juan Alessi using his prior inconsistent statements to Sergeant Dawson regarding a burglary.
Stipulation regarding authenticity of Government Exhibits...
Ms. Comey stipulates on the record that Government Exhibits 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 are true and correct copies of birth certificates from various state and county agencies.
Request to vacate order of January 15, 2021, regarding la...
A formal request submitted to a judge to cancel a previous order from January 15, 2021, and reinstate the prior schedule for laptop access at the institution.
Defendant's flight risk and extradition difficulties
The government's representative is arguing to a judge that the defendant is a flight risk due to her citizenships, international ties, and wealth, combined with the legal difficulties of extraditing her from France or the United Kingdom.
Argument for bail
MR. COHEN makes a concluding argument to the judge, stating that the government has not met its burden of proving his client is a flight risk and requests that the court grant bail.
Request to vacate order of January 15, 2021 regarding lap...
A formal request submitted to a judge to cancel a previous order from January 15, 2021, and to allow the institution (MDC Brooklyn) to return to its prior schedule for laptop access.
Argument for defendant's detention
A speaker, likely a prosecutor, argues to the judge that the defendant should be detained due to witness tampering, being an extraordinary flight risk, and possessing immense wealth and multiple properties.
Alleged incident involving an investigator for Mr. Epstein
An attorney argues that there is no proof Mr. Epstein authorized an investigator to drive people off the road, and that key individuals like Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Roy Black were never questioned about it and do not know the investigator.
Argument for pretrial detention of the defendant
A representative for the government argues that the defendant should be held in pretrial detention due to the seriousness of the sex trafficking charges, the strength of the evidence, and the potential for a long sentence.
Arguments regarding a prior case in Florida
A speaker argues that a Florida prosecutor found complainants and a police report not credible and chose not to prosecute. The speaker also notes that in subsequent civil litigation, the complainants gave sworn testimony disclaiming parts of the police report.
Request to speak
Mr. Lefkowitz interjects to ask if he can be heard for a moment.
Arguments regarding a prior case in Florida
A speaker argues that a Florida prosecutor found complainants and a police report not credible and chose not to prosecute. The speaker also notes that in subsequent civil litigation, the complainants gave sworn testimony disclaiming parts of the police report.
Request to speak
Mr. Lefkowitz interjects to ask if he can be heard for a moment.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity